The Real Culprits Behind the 9-11 Attacks

Renowned British author and World War II London Times journalist, Douglas Reed revealed:

The money- power and the revolutionary – power have been set up and given share of the symbolic shapes (“capitalism” or “communism”) and sharply defined citadels (“America” or “Russia”). Suitably to alarm the mass-minded, the picture offered is that of a bleak and hopeless enmity and confrontation. ... But what if similar men with a common aim secretly rule in both camps? ... I believe any diligent student of our times will discover that this is the case. (DONN DE GRAND PRE, BARBARIANS INSIDE THE GATES, THE BLACK BOOK OF BOLSHEVISM, p. 120 (quoting The New York Times 14 March 1935).


Do we have examples of officials in the U.S. Government who are working toward a Zionist communist world government? President of the United States, Franklin Roosevelt, for one, was guided secretly by a communist agenda. Josephine Adams testified under oath before a subcommittee of the U.S. Senate that she acted as a courier between Earl Bowder, then Chief of the American Communist Party, and Franklin Roosevelt. She testified that she met with Roosevelt approximately 40 times during a three year period prior to Roosevelt’s death. She testified that the meetings took place either in Roosevelt’s Hyde Park home or the White House. This testimony of Adams was later confirmed as true by Browder himself, who took pride in the fact that FDR appreciated the guidance Browder gave him.


A Congressional investigation has revealed that in 1996 Vice President Al Gore peddled his influence to the Chinese Communist Government through an Israeli intermediary. (DONN DE GRAND PRE, BARBARIANS INSIDE THE GATES, THE BLACK BOOK OFBOLSHEVISM, p. 250 (2000) (quoting Representative Louis McFadden, radio address, May 2,1934).

Representative Louis T. McFadden in a May 2, 1934 radio address stated:

It would be a monstrous mistake for any intelligent citizen of whatever nation to close his eyes to the evident fact that for nigh sixty years, the Jews have surely and rapidly though almost invisibly climbed to the heights of government wherefrom the masses are ruled. Politically, financially and economically they have seized the reigns of governments of all nations and their invasion in the realms of social, educational and religious fields not less important.


Congressman McFadden, who was Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee, knew the power that the Jews wielded and the calamities that they caused. Just as the PROTOCOLS provided, the Talmudic Jews controlled the money supply through a central bank (The Federal Reserve Bank). Congressman McFadden sated: "It [the depression] was not accidental. It was a carefully contrived occurrence....The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that they might emerge as the rulers of us all." ...The end result, if the Insiders have their way, will be the dream of Montagu Norman of the Bank of England "that the Hegemony of World Finance should reign supreme over everyone, everywhere, as one whole super-national control mechanism."


Representative McFadden addressed the U.S. House of Representatives on June 10, 1932. "Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are U.S. government institutions. They are not government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the U.S. for the benefit of themselves and their foreign and domestic swindlers, and rich and predatory money lenders." In essence, the international Jewish money power used corrupt politicians to push through the Federal Reserve Act, which gave them a monopoly to print the money of the nation. The Federal Reserve Act legalizes theft for a select few commercial banks that make up the Federal Reserve. Excerpts from McFadden’s speech exposes the methods that the Ashkenazi Jews used to obtain their immense power over the government of the United States:

Mr. Chairman, at the present session of Congress we have been dealing with emergency situations. We have been dealing with the effect of things rather than with the cause of things. In this particular discussion I shall deal with some of the causes that lead up to these proposals. There are underlying principles which are responsible for conditions such as we have at the present time and I shall deal with one of these in particular which is tremendously important in the consideration that you are now giving to this bill.

Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government board, has cheated the Government of the United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board has cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the defects of the law under which it operates, through the maladministration of that law by the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.

Some people think the Federal Reserve banks are United States Government institutions. They are not Government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lenders. In that dark crew of financial pirates there are those who would cut a man's throat to get a dollar out of his pocket; there are those who send money into States to buy votes to control our legislation; and there are those who maintain international propaganda for the purpose of deceiving us and of wheedling us into the granting of new concessions which will permit them to cover up their past misdeeds and set again in motion their gigantic train of crime.

These twelve private credit monopolies were deceitfully and disloyally foisted upon this country by the bankers who came here from Europe and repaid us for our hospitality by undermining our American institutions. Those bankers took money out of this country to finance Japan in a war against Russia. They created a reign of terror in Russia with our money in order to help that war along. They instigated the separate peace between Germany and Russia and thus drove a wedge between the Allies in the World War. They financed Trotsky's passage from New York to Russia so that he might assist in the destruction of the Russian Empire. They fomented and instigated the Russian revolution and they placed a large fund of American dollars at Trotsky's disposal in one of their branch banks in Sweden so that through him Russian homes might be thoroughly broken up and Russian children flung far and wide from their natural protectors. They have since begun the breaking up of American homes and the dispersal of American children.


* * *



In 1912 the National Monetary Association, under the chairmanship of the late Senator Nelson W. Aldrich, made a report and presented a vicious bill called the National Reserve Association bill. This bill is usually spoken of as the Aldrich bill. Senator Aldrich did not write the Aldrich bill. He was the tool, but not the accomplice, of the European-born bankers who for nearly twenty years had been scheming to set up a central bank in this country and who in 1912 had spent and were continuing to spend vast sums of money to accomplish their purpose.

The Aldrich bill was condemned in the platform upon which Theodore Roosevelt was nominated in the year 1912, and in that same year, when Woodrow Wilson was nominated, the Democratic platform, as adopted at the Baltimore convention, expressly stated: "We are opposed to the Aldrich plan for a central bank." This was plain language. The men who ruled the Democratic Party then promised the people that if they were returned to power there would be no central bank established here while they held the reigns of government. Thirteen months later that promise was broken, and the Wilson administration, under the tutelage of those sinister Wall Street figures who stood behind Colonel House, established here in our free country the worm-eaten monarchical institution of the "king's bank" to control us from the top downward, and to shackle us from the cradle to the grave. The Federal Reserve act destroyed our old and characteristic way of doing business; it discriminated against our one-name commercial paper, the finest in the world; it set up the antiquated two-name paper, which is the present curse of this country, and which wrecked every country which has ever given it scope; it fastened down upon this country the very tyranny from which the framers of the Constitution sought to save us.

One of the greatest battles for the preservation of this Republic was fought out here in Jackson's day, when the Second Bank of the United States, which was founded upon the same false principles as those which are here exemplified in the Federal Reserve act, was hurled out of existence. After the downfall of the Second Bank of the United States in 1837, the country was warned against the dangers that might ensue if the predatory interests, after being cast out, should come back in disguise and unite themselves to the Executive, and through him acquire control of the Government. That is what the predatory interests did when they came back in the livery of hypocrisy and under false pretenses obtained the passage of the Federal Reserve act.


The danger that the country was warned against came upon us and is shown in the long train of horrors attendant upon the affairs of the traitorous and dishonest Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks are fully liable. This is an era of financed crime and in the financing of crime, the Federal Reserve Board does not play the part of a disinterested spectator.

It has been said that the draftsman who was employed to write the text of the Federal Reserve bill used a text of the Aldrich bill for his purpose. It has been said that the language of the Aldrich bill was used because the Aldrich bill had been drawn up by expert lawyers and seemed to be appropriate. It was indeed drawn up by lawyers. The Aldrich bill was created by acceptance bankers of European origin in New York City. It was a copy and in general a translation of the statutes of the Reichsbank and other European central banks.

Half a million dollars was spent one part of the propaganda organized by those same European bankers for the purpose of misleading public opinion in regard to it, and for the purpose of giving Congress the impression that there was an overwhelming popular demand for that kind of banking legislation and the kind of currency that goes with it, namely, an asset currency based on human debts and obligations instead of an honest currency based on gold and silver values. Dr. H. Parker Willis had been employed by the Wall Street bankers and propagandists and when the Aldrich measure came to naught and he obtained employment with Carter Glass to assist in drawing a banking bill for the Wilson administration, he appropriated the text of the Aldrich bill for his purpose. There is no secret about it. The text of the Federal Reserve act was tainted from the beginning.

* * *

The Government is in the banking business as never before. Against its will it has been made the backer of horse thieves and card sharps, bootleggers, smugglers, speculators, and swindlers in all parts of the world. Through the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks the riffraff of every country is operating on the public credit of this United States Government. Meanwhile, and on account of it, we ourselves are in the midst of the greatest depression we have ever known. Thus the menace to our prosperity, so feared by Senator Lodge, has indeed struck home. From the Atlantic to the Pacific our country has been ravaged and laid waste by the evil practices of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks and the interests which control them. At no time in our history has the general welfare of the people of the United States been at a lower level or the mind of the people so filled with despair. Recently in one of our States 60,000 dwelling houses and farms were brought under the hammer in a single day. According to the Rev. Father Charles E. Coughlin, who has lately testified before a committee of this House, 71,000 houses and farms in Oakland County, Michigan, have been sold and their erstwhile owners dispossessed. Similar occurrences have probably taken place in every county in the United States. The people who have thus been driven out are the wastage of the Federal Reserve act. They are the victims of the dishonest and unscrupulous Federal Reserve Board and Federal Reserve banks. Their children are the new slaves of the auction blocks in the revival here of the institution of human slavery.

In 1913, before the Senate Banking and Currency Committee, Mr. Alexander Lassen made the following statement:

‘But the whole scheme of the Federal Reserve bank with its commercial-paper basis is an impractical, cumbersome machinery, is simply a cover, to find a way to secure the privilege of issuing money and to evade payment of as much tax upon circulation as possible, and then control the issue and maintain, instead of reduce, interest rates. It is a system that, if inaugurated, will prove to the advantage of the few and the detriment of the people of the United States. It will mean continued shortage of actual money and further extension of credits; for when there is a lack of real money people have to borrow credit to their cost.’

A few days before the Federal Reserve act was passed Senator Elihu Root denounced the Federal Reserve bill as an outrage on our liberties and made the following prediction: "Long before we wake up from our dreams of prosperity through an inflated currency, our gold, which alone could have kept us from catastrophe, will have vanished and no rate of interest will tempt it to return." If ever a prophecy came true, that one did. It was impossible, however, for those luminous and instructed thinkers to control the course of events. On December 23, 1913, the Federal Reserve bill became law, and that night Colonel House wrote to his hidden master in Wall Street as follows:

‘I want to say a word of appreciation to you for the silent but no doubt effective work you have done in the interest of currency legislation and to congratulate you that the measure has finally been enacted into law. We all know that an entirely perfect bill, satisfactory to everybody, would have been an impossibility, and I feel quite certain that unless the President had stood as firm as he did we should likely have had no legislation at all. The bill is a good one in many respects; anyhow good enough to start with and to let experience teach us in what direction it needs perfection, which in due time we shall then get. In any event you have personally good reason to feel gratified with what has been accomplished.’

The words "unless the President had stood as firm as he did we should likely have had no legislation at all," were a gentle reminder that it was Colonel House himself, the "holy monk," who had kept the President firm.

The foregoing letter affords striking evidence of the manner in which the predatory interests then sought to control the Government of the United States by surrounding the Executive with the personality and the influence of a financial Judas. Left to itself and to the conduct of its own legislative functions without pressure from the Executive, the Congress would not have passed the Federal Reserve act. According to Colonel House, and since this was his report to his master, we may believe it to be true, the Federal Reserve act was passed because Wilson stood firm; in other words because Wilson was under the guidance and control of the most ferocious usurers in New York through their hireling, House. The Federal Reserve act became law the day before Christmas Eve in the year 1913, and shortly afterwards the German international bankers, Kuhn, Loeb and Co., sent one of their partners here to run it.


* * *

Immense sums belonging to our national-bank depositors have been given to Germany on no collateral security whatever. The Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks have issued United States currency on mere finance drafts drawn by Germans. Billions upon billions of our money has been pumped into Germany and money is still being pumped into Germany by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks. Her worthless paper is still being negotiated here and renewed here on the public credit of the United States Government and at the expense of the American people. On April 27, 1932, the Federal Reserve outfit sent $750,000, belonging to American bank depositors, in gold to Germany. A week later, another $300,000 in gold was shipped to Germany in the same way. About the middle of May $12,000,000 in gold was shipped to Germany by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks. Almost every week there is a shipment of gold to Germany. These shipments are not made for profit on the exchange since the German marks are below parity with the dollar.


* * *

In 1930, while the speculating banks were getting out of the stock market at the expense of the general public, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks advanced them $13,022,782,000. This shows that when the banks were gambling on the public credit of the United States Government as represented by the Federal Reserve currency, they were subsidized to any amount they required by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks. When the swindle began to fall, the bankers knew it in advance and withdrew from the market. They got out with whole skins and left the people of the United States to pay the piper.


* * *

This is the John Law swindle all over again. The theft of Teapot Dome was trifling compared to it. What king ever robbed his subjects to such an extent as the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks have robbed us? Is it any wonder that there have lately been ninety cases of starvation in one of the New York hospitals? Is there any wonder that the children of this country are being dispersed and abandoned?

The Government and the people of the United States have been swindled by swindlers deluxe to whom the acquisition of American gold or a parcel of Federal Reserve notes presented no more difficulty than the drawing up of a worthless acceptance in a country not subject to the laws of the United States, by sharpers not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States courts, sharpers with a strong banking "fence" on this side of the water -- a "fence" acting as a receiver of the worthless paper coming from abroad, endorsing it and getting the currency out of the Federal Reserve banks for it as quickly as possible, exchanging that currency for gold, and in turn transmitting the gold to its foreign confederates.


* * *

A few days ago, the President of the United States, with a white face and shaking hands, went before the Senate on behalf of the moneyed interests and asked the Senate to levy a tax on the people so that foreigners might know that the United States would pay its debt to them. Most Americans thought it was the other way around. What do the United States owe to foreigners? When and by whom was the debt incurred? It was incurred by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks when they peddled the signature of this Government to foreigners for a price. It is what the United States Government has to pay to redeem the obligations of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks. Are you going to let those thieves get off scot free? Is there one law for the looter who drives up to the door of the United States Treasury in his limousine and another for the United States veterans who are sleeping on the floor of a dilapidated house on the outskirts of Washington?

The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad is here asking for a large loan from the people and the wage earners and the taxpayers of the United States. It is begging for a hand-out from the Government. It is standing, cap in hand, at the door of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, where all the other jackals have gathered to the feast. It is asking for money that was raised from the people by taxation, and wants this money of the poor for the benefit of Kuhn, Loeb, & Co., the German international bankers. Is there one law for the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad and another for the needy veterans it threw off its freight cars the other day? Is there one law for sleek and prosperous swindlers who call themselves bankers and another law for the soldiers who defended the United States flag?


* * *

It will take us twenty years to redeem our Government. Twenty years of penal servitude to pay off the gambling debts of the traitorous Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks and to earn again that vast flood of American wages and savings, bank deposits, and United States Government credit which the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks exported out of this country to their foreign principals.

The Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks lately conducted an anti-hoarding campaign here. Then they took that extra money which they had persuaded the American people to put into the banks and they sent it to Europe along with the rest. In the last several months, they have sent $1,300,000,000 in gold to their foreign employers, their foreign masters, and every dollar of that gold belonged to the people of the United States and was unlawfully taken from them.



This is a Government of the people, by the people, for the people. Consequently, nothing should be concealed from the people. The man who deceives the people is a traitor to the United States. The man who knows or suspects that a crime has been committed and who conceals or covers up that crime is an accessory to it. Mr. Speaker, it is a monstrous thing for this great Nation of people to have its destinies presided over by a traitorous Government board acting in secret concert with international usurers. Every effort has been made by the Federal Reserve Board to conceal its power but the truth is the Federal Reserve Board has usurped the Government of the United States. It controls everything here and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will. No man and no body of men is more entrenched in power than the arrogant credit monopoly which operates the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks. These evil-doers have robbed this country of more than enough money to pay the national debt. What the National Government has permitted the Federal Reserve Board to steal from the people should now be restored to the people. The people have a valid claim against the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks. If that claim is enforced, Americans will not need to stand in the breadlines or to suffer and die of starvation in the streets. Homes will be saved, families will be kept together, and American children will not be dispersed and abandoned. The Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks owe the United States Government an immense sum of money. We ought to find out the exact amount of the people's claim. We should know the amount of the indebtedness of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks to the people and we should investigate this treacherous and disloyal conduct of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks.


* * *

Mr. Chairman, when the Federal Reserve act was passed, the people of the United States did not perceive that a world system was being set up here which would make the savings of an American school-teacher available to a narcotic-drug vendor in Macao. They did not perceive that the United States were to be lowered to the position of a coolie country which has nothing but raw materials and heavy goods for export; that Russia was destined to supply the man power and that this country was to supply financial power to an international superstate -- a superstate controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure.

The people of the United States are being greatly wronged. If they are not, then I do not know what "wronging the people" means. They have been driven from their employments. They have been dispossessed of their homes. They have been evicted from their rented quarters. They have lost their children. They have been left to suffer and to die for lack of shelter, food, clothing, and medicine.

The wealth of the United States and the working capital of the United States has been taken away from them and has either been locked in the vaults of certain banks and the great corporations or exported to foreign countries for the benefit of the foreign customers of those banks and corporations. So far as the people of the United States are concerned, the cupboard is bare. It is true that the warehouses and coal yards and grain elevators are full, but the warehouses and coal yards and grain elevators are padlocked and the great banks and corporations hold the keys. The sack of the United States by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks is the greatest crime in history.

Mr. Chairman, a serious situation confronts the House of Representatives to-day. We are trustees of the people and the rights of the people are being taken away from them. Through the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks, the people are losing the rights guaranteed to them by the Constitution. Their property has been taken from them without due process of law. Mr. Chairman, common decency requires us to examine the public accounts of the Government and see what crimes against the public welfare have and are being committed.

What is needed here is a return to the Constitution of the United States. We need to have a complete divorce of Bank and State. The old struggle that was fought out here in Jackson's day must be fought over again. The independent United States Treasury should be re-established and the Government should keep its own money under lock and key in the building the people provided for that purpose. Asset currency, the device of the swindler, should be done away with. The Government should buy gold and issue United States currency on it. The business of the independent bankers should be restored to them. The State banking systems should be freed from coercion The Federal Reserve districts should be abolished and the State boundaries should be respected. Bank reserves should be kept within the borders of the States whose people own them, and this reserve money of the people should be protected so that the international bankers and acceptance bankers and discount dealers can not draw it away from them. The exchanges should be closed while we are putting our financial affairs in order. The Federal Reserve act should be repealed and the Federal Reserve banks, having violated their charters, should be liquidated immediately. Faithless Government officers who have violated their oaths of office should be impeached and brought to trial. Unless this is done by us, I predict that the American people, outraged, robbed, pillaged, insulted, and betrayed as they are in their own land, will rise in their wrath and send a President here who will sweep the money changers out of the temple.


Notice some of the amazing revelations in Representative McFadden’s speech. First, the communist revolution in Russia was financed by the Federal Reserve. Second, billions of dollars and millions of ounces of the gold deposits of the United States were stolen by the Federal Reserve Banks and sent to Germany. As he spoke in 1932, huge amounts of gold were being sent to Germany on a weekly basis. Why was this money being sent to Germany? To fund the Nazis. It was only a little over eight months later, on January 30, 1933, that Adolph Hitler was sworn in as Chancellor of Germany. Within a year, Hitler had consolidated enough power, with the help of the Federal Reserve, that he declared himself “Fuhrer” (leader) of Germany. The gold he received from the Federal Reserve was used to build planes, ships, tanks, and guns that were used to kill brave Americans during World War II. The Federal Reserve Board and Banks funded both the communists in Russia and the Nazis in Germany, all at the expense of the hard labor of the American middle class.


Even during World War II, the United States funded the communist Russians through the insane and misleading “lend-lease” program. In addition to our own financial burdens of the war, the U.S. taxpayers funded the Germans and the Russians. The Ashekanazi Jewish Bankers, having funded both sides of the war, made out like bandits.


As a consequence of Congressman McFadden’s discovery of treasonous criminal conduct, on May 23, 1933, he brought formal criminal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank, the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Secretary of the United States Treasury. The petition for Articles of Impeachment was, thereafter, referred to the Judiciary Committee.


Representative McFadden was Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee and was in a position to do something about the banking monopoly. The Zionist Jews could not allow such a powerful person to oppose their plans. They tried several times to assassinate Representative McFadden. They were ultimately successful; in 1935 they poisoned him. After Representative McFadden’s death, the bill introduced by him was pigeonholed in the Judiciary Committee and has never seen the light of day since.


The Zionists now have almost completely infiltrated the U.S. government. They control U.S. policies, which are slanted in favor of Israel. They are assisted by the Jesuits in their efforts to control Palestine. Jesuits are Zionists and they want Jewish control of Palestine. They plan on Jerusalem being the new capital of their empire from which the papal antichrist will rule the world. The antichrists throne will be in a rebuilt Jewish Temple. The Jesuits have already orchestrated negotiations between the Israelis and the Vatican, wherein the Vatican will gain control of Jerusalem. In March 1995 a secret cable from the Israeli embassy in Rome to the Israeli Foreign Ministry was leaked to an Israeli radio station (Arutz Sheva). That cable memorialized plans by the Israeli government to hand over Jerusalem to the Vatican. No doubt the plans include removing the Islamic Dome of the Rock from the temple mount, so that the Jewish Temple can be rebuilt. The Jesuit plans would completely fail if the Jews destroyed the Dome of the Rock, so they will probably use the United States to do it. Such an act by the U.S. against the so-called third “holiest” site in all of Islam will bring an Islamic Jihad (holy war) upon the United States. The strategy then for the Zionists is to get the United States into a war against Muslims. That is the purpose behind the destruction of the World Trade Center. It serves the interests of the Zionists to have the United States wipe out the Muslim resistance to Jewish control over the entire Middle East. Be mindful that Jewish control will be Talmudic control, which means communist control.


The Illuminati have used certain front organizations that they use to infiltrate and control governments, including the U.S. government. One group is called the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Admiral Chester Ward was a member of the CFR for 16 years. He resigned from the CFR when he realized that its goal was to disarm and surrender the United States to an all powerful world government. One stage in that process was the establishment of the United Nations (UN). What are the guiding principles of the UN? UN Secretary General U. Thant was quoted in the April 7, 1970 Los Angeles Times as stating: “[Communist dictator Vladmir] Lenin was a man with a mind fo great clarity and incisiveness and his ideas have had a profound influence on the course of contemporary history. . . . His ideals of peaceful coexistence among states . . . are in line with the aims of the UN Charter.”


That is not a surprise when one considers that Alger Hiss was the architect of the UN. Alger Hiss was a U.S. State department official who was Secretary General of the UN’s founding conference and coauthor of the UN Charter. Alger Hiss, was also a treasonous soviet spy. How do we know Hiss was a soviet spy? Because former communist Whitaker Chambers came forward and fingered Hiss. Hiss was ultimately convicted of perjury for lying about his espionage activities for the Soviet Union. Hiss likely would have been convicted of espionage itself if he was charged with that offense, but the statute of limitations prevented that charge.


Former Senator Warren Rudman made the following revealing statement at the September 14, 2001 Washington Program for the Council on Foreign Relations: “There is a chance for the President of the United States to use this disaster [the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on the WTC] to carry out what his father - a phrase his father used I think only once, and it hasn’t been used since - and that is a new world order.” George W. Bush’s Father’s vision referred to by Senator Rudman was a vision of a one world government under the auspices of the UN. The UN is simply a communist front organization. This new world order of which the CFR is so fond, is a one world communist government. As we have seen, communism is Zionism!


Washington Post ombudsman Richard Harwood stated that the CFR is the nearest thing we have to a ruling establishment in the United States. He wrote the following in the October 30, 1993 issue of the Washington Post:

The president is a member. So is his secretary of state, the deputy secretary of state, all five of the undersecretaries, several of the assistant secretaries and the department's legal adviser. The president's national security adviser and his deputy are members. The director of Central Intelligence (like all previous directors) and the chairman of the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board are members. The secretary of defense, three undersecretaries and at least four assistant secretaries are members. The secretaries of the departments of housing and urban development, interior, health and human services and the chief White House public relations man ... along with the speaker of the House [are members]....

This is not a retinue of people who "look like America," as the President once put it, but they very definitely look like the people who, for more than half a century, have managed our international affairs and our military-industrial complex.


Georgetown University history professor Carroll Quigley was granted unprecedented access to the secret records of the CFR and wrote in his 1966 book Tragedy and Hope, that the Republican and Democratic parties in the U.S. are completely controlled behind the scenes by the CFR. Quigley agreed with the plans of the CFR stating that “the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy." That is exactly what we see with each change from a Democratic to a Republican administration and vice versa there is no real change in domestic or foreign policy. There is an unchecked treasonous march toward world government led by the Zionist pied pipers.


Woodrow Wilson was oppressed and controlled by a sinister Zionist cabal, which he described in his 1913 book The New Freedom: "Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U.S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."


The CIA, the State Department, and the FBI have been infiltrated by these Zionist agents and their fellow travelers. The policies of the U.S. government, consequently, have been subverted to the benefit of the Zionists and to the detriment of the U.S. citizens. On March 9, 1978 Michael Saba witnessed firsthand the power and influence of the Jews in the United States government. He happened to be seated out of view but adjacent to a table where Stephen Bryen, an official of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee met with official representatives of Israel at the Madison Hotel in Washington, D.C. What struck Mr. Saba was that the conversation between Bryen and the Israeli officials was not a general discussion but rather a strategy meeting on how the Israeli delegation could affect United States foreign policy to the benefit of Israel. What surprised Mr. Saba was that Bryen used the pronoun “we” when he expressed the position of the Israeli government and the pronoun “they”when he described the position of the United States government. Mr. Saba had the distinct impression that Mr. Bryen’s loyalties were to Israel rather than to the United States. In other words, Mr. Bryen was a spy. During the discussion Mr. Bryen offered top secret Pentagon documents regarding Arab military bases in the Middle East.


Once Mr. Saba revealed the events to the U.S. Justice Department, he found out the power that the Jews have in the United States government. At every turn, the investigation of his allegations were thwarted. In addition, despite the ongoing investigation of Mr. Bryen by the U.S. Justice Department, Bryen was allowed to become the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense in the Reagan Administration. The handling of the Bryan espionage revealed that the highest levels of the U.S. government was infiltrated by a network of Jews that was beholden to Israel. Not only were elements in the U.S. government working to protect Bryen, but the major media did everything possible to kill the story. Whiled initially reporters were very interested in the story, suddenly they became uninterested once they returned to their offices. Mr. Saba labeled this interlocking Jewish web the Armageddon Network.


The infamous attack on the USS Liberty demonstrates the power of the Jews in the U.S. government. During the Israeli Six Day War, the Liberty, an American intelligence gathering ship, was sailing in international waters. Apparently the Liberty had discovered something that the Israelis government did not want revealed. Israeli aircraft and torpedo boats attacked the Liberty. The attack lasted for 75 minutes, during which U.S. Defense Secretary Robert McNamara and Lyndon Johnson ordered the Admiral on a nearby aircraft carrier to recall his jets and NOT to come to the Liberty's aid.


Some have speculated that the Israelis may have been concerned that the Liberty might detect the cold blooded murder of 150 Egyptian POWs by the Israelis. Others have suggested that the intent of the attack was to sink the vessel and kill the entire crew and then blame the massacre on the Egyptians; thus the Americans would enter the conflict on the side of the Israelis. That theory is supported by the nature of the attack. Israeli aircraft flew approximately 13 close up reconnaissance sorties on a day with clear skies over the six hours between 6:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. Then at approximately 2:00 p.m. unmarked aircraft came in from all directions at once in a massive air attack that included machine gun fire, rocket attacks, and even the dropping of napalm bombs on the ship. The aircraft had no identifying markings, which was in violation of the Geneva Convention. Because the aircraft were unmarked, the sailors on the USS Liberty did not know at the time of the attack who were the attacking forces. The objective of the first waive of attacks was to knock out the communications capability of the ship. The attackers succeeded, but the sailors on the Liberty were able to rig a communications antenna and transmit an S.O.S., which was received by the Sixth Fleet. However, MacNamara and Johnson treasonously recalled the American jets sent to defend the Liberty.


The initial air attack was followed by a torpedo attack by 3 torpedo boats, which fired 6 torpedoes at the Liberty, with one hit. The torpedo hit produced a huge gaping hole on the side of the ship, but miraculously it did not sink. The life rafts were launched, but they were immediately shot up by machine gun fire from the jets. It was clear to those on board the Liberty that the intent was to sink the ship and leave no survivors. An Israeli helicopter gun ship made an appearance and waited nearby expecting the Liberty to sink. The inferred mission of the gun ship was to machine gun any life boats and any one who was floating in the water to ensure that there would be no survivors. When the Liberty did not sink as expected, the helicopter flew off. If the Israelis had succeeded in their mission and there had been no survivors, the Israelis and the Zionists in the U.S. Government could lay the blame for the attack on Egypt and thus the U.S. would have been drawn into the war on the side of Israel. The attack on the USS Liberty could be just another case in the long history of Israel acting as agent provocateur.


David Lewis of Lemington, Vermont, was a sailor on the Liberty when it was attacked. In an interview, Lewis said Israel had to know it was targeting an American ship. He said a U.S. flag was flying that day and Israel shot it full of holes. He said that the sailors on the ship quickly hoisted another American flag, which was a much bigger one, to show Israel it was a U.S. vessel. "No trained individual could be that inept," said Lewis of the Israeli forces.


It is not just the subjective opinion of one sailor that the attack was deliberate, it is also the considered conclusion reached by the lead investigators who interviewed the other witnesses and examined the evidence. Jews, however, had such complete control over the reigns of the U.S. government that they controlled the outcome of the military investigation into the attack on the USS Liberty. On October 22, 2003, Ward Boston, a retired captain and a former navy lawyer who was the senior legal counsel in the military investigation of the June 8,1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty released a sworn affidavit at a Capitol Hill news conference. In the affidavit Boston stated that former President Lyndon Johnson and defense secretary, Robert McNamara, ordered those leading the investigation into the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty to “conclude that the attack was a case of 'mistaken identity' despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.” Boston said in the sworn statement that he stayed silent for years because he's a military man, and "when orders come, I follow them."


He said he felt compelled to "share the truth" following the publication of a recent book, The Liberty Incident, by Jay Cristol, which concluded the attack was unintentional. Cristol, is a retired Navy pilot and member of the judge advocate's office. Boston further stated in his affidavit: "The evidence was clear. Both Admiral (Isaac) Kidd and I believed with certainty that this attack, which killed 34 America sailors and injured 172 others, was a deliberate effort to sink an American ship and murder its entire crew. I am certain that the Israeli pilots that undertook the attack as well as their superiors who had ordered the attack, were aware the ship was American." His affidavit continued: "I am outraged at the efforts of apologists for Israel in this country to claim this attack was a case of 'mistaken identity,'" he wrote. In particular, the recent publication of Jay Cristol's book, the 'Liberty Incident,' twists the facts and misrepresents the views of those of us who investigated the attack. It is Cristol's insidious attempt to whitewash the facts that has pushed me to speak out."


Boston said "I saw the flag, which visibly identified the ship as American, riddled with bullet holes, and heard testimony that made it clear the Israelis intended there be no survivors." Admiral Kidd and Boston traveled to Malta to conduct the inquiry into the attack. The USS Liberty had been taken to Malta for repairs and care of the wounded. Though both Kidd and Boston agreed the attack was intentional, Kidd prepared a report that went with the Israeli version of events. "I know from personal conversations I had with Admiral Kidd that President Lyndon Johnson and Secretary of Defense (Robert) McNamara ordered him to conclude the attack was a case of 'mistaken identity,'" Boston's affidavit said.


There is additional clear and convincing evidence that proves beyond any doubt that the Israeli attack was intentional. Communications between the attacking Israeli jets and their headquarters were intercepted by U.S. Military electronic surveillance planes as the aircraft approached the USS Liberty. The Israeli pilots were clearly ordered by their controllers to find and quickly sink "the American ship" (the USS Liberty). Those intercepted communications were almost simultaneously translated and broadcast from a U.S. Air Force C130 surveillance plane flying near the scene to an intelligence site at Crete. The communications were then immediately sent to Washington and to other stations as "Critical Intelligence," (known as CRTICs). CRTICs are sent via the fastest and most secure means available. These reports routinely arrived in the White House, State Department, and Pentagon within ten minutes or less of their interception. Israel was caught in the act and their treachery was known to the highest levels of the US government, before the attack was even completed. At the time Johnson talked to Admiral Geis nobody on the Liberty nor the Sixth Fleet knew who the attackers were, because the attacking Israeli jets were unmarked. The receipt of the CRITIC reports by Johnson (and the possibility of direct communications by him with Israel) would explain how President Johnson knew that the attack on the Liberty was an attack by an ally (Israel) when he ordered Admiral Geis not to defend the Liberty.


Former U.S. Air Force Intelligence Analyst Stephen Forslund recalls seeing the communication intercepts of the Israeli attack on the Liberty as follows:

Much discussion has gone on about what the NSA archives hold about the Liberty attack. The latest I read, stated that the only and final "tapes" that the NSA has released show that helicopters sent by Israel to the site of the attack on the Liberty, after the attack, were unaware of her nationality. Much importance is put on this issue by different factions in this debate. Parties state that these are the only tapes of intercepts that exist. That may very well be true, now. Nothing I can say will change anyone's mind but I have to state, for my own peace of mind, what I witnessed as an all source intelligence analyst for the U.S. Air Force during the 6 day war.

There were other intercepts, and I and many others like me, read transcripts of the air-to-air and air-to-ground communications of the fighters who attacked the USS Liberty. We read these in real time during the day the attack occurred. These intercepts were preceded by many others we read that week that started with the opening attack by Israel in the war and included intercepts of messages between the USA and Israel in which our government stated their knowledge of the Israeli's pre-emptive attack that began the war and warned Israel to cease their activities.

On the day of the attack on the Liberty, I read yellow teletype sheets that spewed from the machines in front of me all day. We obtained our input from a variety of sources including the NSA. The teletypes were raw translations of intercepts of Israeli air-to-air and air-to-ground communications between jet aircraft and their ground controller. I read page after page of these transcripts that day as it went on and on. The transcripts made specific reference to the efforts to direct the jets to the target which was identified as American numerous times by the ground controller. Upon arrival, the aircraft specifically identified the target and mentioned the American flag she was flying. There were frequent operational transmissions from the pilots to the ground base describing the strafing runs. The ground control began asking about the status of the target and whether it was sinking. They stressed that the target must be sunk and leave no trace. The pilots stated they had made several runs and the target was still floating. The ground control station re-iterated that it was urgent that the target be sunk, leaving no trace. There was a detectable level of frustration evident in the transmissions over the fact that the aircraft were unable to accomplish the mission quickly and totally.

The aircraft eventually broke off and we received no further transcripts of the event. I have since learned in later descriptions of the attack that torpedo boats attacked the Liberty also. I saw neither intercepts nor analyses that addressed that attack. An hour or two later I was discussing the event with a team member and he stated they had received, during the time frame of the attack, an intercept of a US State Department message to Israel stating that the United States had full evidence of what had occurred in the attack on the Liberty and strongly warning Israel to cease activities immediately.

Imagine my surprise when, upon going home that night, I was watching the evening news and a short piece that gave vague reference to a mistaken attack by Israel upon an American ship off Sinai came on. The next day there was a small article buried in the A section of the paper stating that there had been an accidental attack on the USS Liberty and that the governments involved were in discussions. I saw little mention after that in the popular press and, of course, said nothing for the next 36 years.

I read these discussions debating whether Israel intentionally attacked the USS Liberty and what their motivation would have been for a deliberate attack. I can't debate their motivation. But, I will carry the memory of those transcripts with me until I die. We all lost our virginity that day.


The statement of Intelligence Analyst Forslund is supported by James Ronald Gotcher, III, who was a Sergeant in the United States Air Force, assigned to the 6924th Security Squadron, Da Nang, in the Republic of Vietnam, when on June 8, 1967, CRITIC message that the USS Liberty was under attack by Israel. In Gotcher’s September 2, 2003, sworn affidavit, quoted in part below, he states:

I, James Ronald Gotcher, do declare under penalty of perjury that the following statement is true and complete, and based entirely upon my personal knowledge gained through direct observation, unless specifically stated otherwise:
* * * 7. It was clear from the explicit statements made by both the aircraft crews and the controllers that the aircraft were flying a planned mission to find and sink USS Liberty.
8. My understanding of what I read led me to conclude that the Israeli pilots were making every effort possible to sink USS Liberty and were very frustrated by their inability to do so.
9. Approximately ten days to two weeks later, we received an internal NSA report, summarizing the Agency’s findings. The report stated, in no uncertain terms, that the attack was planned in advance and deliberately executed. The mission was to sink USS Liberty.
10. A few days after the report arrived, another message came through directing the document control officer to gather and destroy all copies of both the rough and final intercept translations, as well as the subsequently issued report.
11. After the destruction of those documents, I saw nothing further on this subject.
12. I have read the translated transcripts, released by the Israeli government, which purport to be actual transcripts of the air to ground communications between the controllers and the attacking aircraft. I know this document to be a fabrication because I have read the actual intercepts and they were nothing like this. It is not possible that the differences could be due to different translations being used.
13. If called upon to testify, I am competent to testify to all of the foregoing on the basis of direct observation and personal knowledge.


To add to the clear and convincing evidence that the attack on the Liberty by Israel was deliberate, we have former Israeli military personnel who were there on the scene and have since revealed the truth. James M. Ennes Jr, in his book Assault on the Liberty, reports the following:

Fifteen years after the attack, an Israeli pilot approached Liberty survivors and then held extensive interviews with former Congressman Paul N. (Pete) McCloskey about his role. According to this senior Israeli lead pilot, he recognized the Liberty as American immediately, so informed his headquarters, and was told to ignore the American flag and continue his attack. He refused to do so and returned to base, where he was arrested.

Later, a dual-citizen Israeli major told survivors that he was in an Israeli war room where he heard that pilot's radio report. The attacking pilots and everyone in the Israeli war room knew that they were attacking an American ship, the major said. He recanted the statement only after he received threatening phone calls from Israel.


Lieutenant Commander David E. Lewis, the officer in charge of Liberty's Research Department, had a meeting with Rear Admiral Lawrence R. Geis shortly after the Liberty attack. Admiral Geis was the officer in charge of the embarked aircraft in both the USS America and USS Saratoga. Commander Lewis stated that Admiral Geis told him the following: Admiral Geis “said that he wanted somebody to know that we weren't forgotten... attempts HAD been made to come to our assistance. He said that he had launched a flight of aircraft to come to our assistance, and he had then called Washington. Secretary McNamara came on the line and ordered the recall of the aircraft, which he did. Concurrently, he said that since he suspected that they were afraid that there might have been nuclear weapons on board he reconfigured another flight of aircraft... strictly conventional weaponry... and re-launched it. After the second launch, he again called Washington to let them know what was going on. Again, Secretary McNamara ordered the aircraft recalled. Not understanding why, he requested confirmation of the order, and the next higher in command came on to confirm that...President Johnson... with the instructions that the aircraft were to be returned, that he would not have his allies embarrassed, he didn't care who was killed or what was done to the ship...words to that effect. With that, Admiral Geis swore me to secrecy for his lifetime. I had been silent up until I found out from Admiral Moorer that Admiral Geis had passed away.”


Thirty four Americans were killed and 172 wounded in the attack. Israel claimed it was a case of mistaken identity. However, U.S. intelligence revealed that it was a deliberate attack ordered by Israeli General Moshe Dyan. Former Secretary of State Dean Rusk and former Joint Chief of Staff Chairman, Admiral Thomas Moorer have both stated that the Israeli attack was deliberate. That incident gives some idea of the power and control that the Jews have in the U.S. government. They can control the very apex of the executive branch of government to order the military to stand by while navy sailors are being massacred by the Israeli military.


Most do not know that Johnson was a crypto-Jew. His policies and conduct toward Israel revealed him as an ardent Zionist. As Commander in Chief of the Army and the Navy, he treasonously prevented the defense of the USS Liberty while it was under attack by Israeli forces and then ordered that the official report of the incident conceal the deliberate nature of the attack. Presumably, Johnson had received the CRTIC communication and therefore knew that the Israelis intended to sink the ship, and he was willing to allow that to happen. One overlooked aspect of the attack on the Liberty is that the Israelis would never have attacked the Liberty unless they could be certain that the Liberty would not be defended by the Sixth Fleet. The only reasonable conclusion is that there must have been coordination between the highest levels of the U.S. government and the Israelis government prior to and during the attack, whereby the Israelis were assured that the Liberty would not be defended. That is treason! National disloyalty is the hallmark of a Zionist Jew. The disloyalty shown by President Lyndon Johnson towards his country during the attack on the U.S.S. Liberty is illustrative of that fact. As a Zionist, Johnson’s first loyalty was to Israel. Although he was President of the United States, and as such Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, he sided with Israel when Israel attacked the United States. Investigative writer, Salvador Astucia, in his book, Opium Lords, explains Lyndon Johnson’s Jewish heritage:

According to Jewish law, if a person’s mother is Jewish, then that person is also Jewish, regardless of the fathers ethnicity or religion. The facts indicate that both of Lyndon Johnson’s great-grandparents, on the maternal side, were Jewish. These were the grandparents of Lyndon’s mother, Rebecca Baines. Their names were John S. Huffman and Mary Elizabeth Perrin. John Huffman’s mother was Suzanne Ament, a common Jewish name. Perrin is also a common Jewish name. Huffman and Perrin had a daughter, Ruth Ament Huffman, who married Joseph Baines and together they had a daughter, Rebekah Baines, Lyndon Johnson’s mother. The line of Jewish mothers can be traced back three generations in Lyndon Johnson’s family tree. There is little doubt that he was Jewish.


Another example of both the control of the Jews over those in government and the international (translation: anti-national) nature of Jews is the Mark Rich case. In the early 1980's billionaire Mark Rich and his partner were under investigation for violations of U.S. federal law as a result of a criminal scheme he conducted through his commodities trading firm Mark Rich & Co., A.G. When in June 1983 Rich and his cohorts realized that they were going to be indicted, they fled from the United States. In September 1983, a federal grand jury issued a 51 count indictment against Mark Rich, his partner Pincus Green, and others for wire fraud, mail fraud, racketeering, racketeering conspiracy, tax evasion, and trading with the enemy. He traded with Iran while American hostages were being held captive during the Iran hostage crisis. Later, in March 1984, the Government filed a 65 count superseding indictment.


Both Rich and Green demonstrated their contempt for the United States by forfeiting their U.S. citizenship and acquired Israeli citizenship. Rich also became a citizen of Spain. The Spanish and Israeli governments refused to extradite Rich or Green to the United States to face prosecution. Because Rich’s attorneys could not convince the U.S. Attorney in New York to dismiss the charges, they decided to obtain a pardon from the President of the United States, Bill Clinton. Rich’s wife, Denise Rich, donated $450,000 to the Bill Clinton library fund and $1.1 million to Democratic causes, including Hillary Rodham Clinton’s Senate campaign. Next, Rich hired former Clinton White House Counsel Jack Quinn to help with the negotiations. Perhaps most telling regarding the Jewish element in the pardons was the enlistment of then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres, each of whom contacted President Clinton to lobby for Rich and Green to be pardoned.


On January 20, 2001, Bill Clinton’s last day as President of the United States, he granted a full and unconditional pardon to 140 people, including Mark Rich and Pincus Green. Rich and Green were pardoned in violation of the Rules Governing Petitions for Executive Clemency, which required that the pardon petition be submitted to the Department of Justice Pardon Attorney. Further, the federal rules required an investigation of the petition. Neither of those things were done. Perhaps most shocking is that Rich and Green were pardoned while still fugitives from justice. Prior to Clinton’s pardon of Rich and Green, no President in the history of the United States had ever pardoned a fugitive from justice.


In many instances the U.S. government has funded terrorist agent provocateurs. For example, it has been commonly reported that the CIA funded Osama Bin Laden to the tune of three billion dollars. Some may respond that the CIA certainly did not expect that he would turn on us and destroy the World Trade Center. Let us examine that argument.


When the U.S. decided to back the Mujahadeen parties that made up the Afghan allied resistance the U.S. aid overwhelmingly flowed to the three most ineffective elements of the resistance. Those elements just happened to be the most virulently anti-American parties of the alliance: the Hez-i-Islami (Party of Islam), led by Gulbaddin Hekmatyar; the Jamiat-i-Islami (Islamic Society), led by Professor Burhanuddin Rabbani and his military commander Ahmed Shah Masood; and Ittehad Islami (Islamic Unity), led by professor Abdul Rasul Sayyaf.


Sibgratullah Mojadidi, a respected Islamic religious leader who was elected president of the Afgahn government-in-exile by the Mujahadeen, repeatedly warned the U.S. of their “mistake” to fund these groups. He informed the U.S. government that Hekmatyar, for one, was murdering his own Mujahadeen allies and collaborating with the communists. As a result of these revelations the U.S. government took an official position of withholding aid from Hekmatyar. Kurt Lohbeck, an independent observer and author of Holy War, Unholy Victory: Eyewitness to the CIA’s Secret War in Afghanistan, was assured by U.S. Ambassador to Pakistan, Robert Oakley, in 1988 that all aid to Hekmatyear would cease. One year later, at a press briefing, Oakley stated categorically that all aid to Hekmatyear had been stopped completely. That official U.S. government announcement was a deception. One week after that press briefing, Lohbeck personally followed a 50 truck convoy of U.S. weapons and supplies from the Peshawar airport directly to Hekmatyar’s camp! Clearly the CIA knew the nature of the group they were assisting and yet continued to do so.


With that in mind let us shift focus to Sheik Omar Abdul Rahman. Sheik Omar was the leader of the terrorist group behind the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. Omar’s plan was to topple one tower into the other causing both to collapse. Let us look at the odd behavior of the CIA and FBI toward Sheik Omar. It will give us a window into who may be responsible for the September 11, 2001 destruction of the twin towers. Sheik Omar was an anti-American Islamic cleric who advocated a holy war against American and Western countries. His hatred for the U.S. was no secret, he had preached his venomous hate filled sermons in the population centers of Turkey, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Germany, England, and even the U.S.


How did Omar get into the U.S.? He got in through the CIA of course. A CIA agent in Khartoum, Sudan posed as an official at the U.S. Consulate and obtained a visa for Sheik Omar. Eight months after his arrival in the U.S., his visa was revoked and he was put on an INS watch list for deportation. Nonetheless, the U.S. government subsequently gave him a green card. It gets worse, the FBI knew the Omar’s group planned to blow up the World Trade Center. In November 1990, the FBI seized 49 boxes of documents from the apartment of El Sayyid Nosair, who had assassinated militant Jewish Rabbi Meir Kahane. Among the materials seized by the FBI were detailed pictures of famous buildings, including the World Trade Center and sermons by Sheik Omar urging his followers to “destroy the edifices of capitalism.”


That is not all the FBI had. They also had inside information. Emad A. Salem, who was Sheik Omar’s bodyguard, was an FBI informant. The FBI, though, had a curiously timed fit of incompetence. As reported by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the FBI pulled Salem from the operation. As we shall see later, Salem was pulled from the investigation after the bombs were constructed.

In June 1992 El-Gabrowny visited Nosair again in prison. Upon his return, he instructed Salem and Shinawy that Nosair wanted to see them. Salem testified that, when they made the visit, Nosair berated them for not proceeding with bombing plans and directed Shinawy to seek a fatwa from Abdel Rahman approving the bombings. On the way home from the visit, Shinaway told Salem that the planned operation would involve twelve bombs. Shinawy also explained that they would need guns in case they encountered police during the deployment, indicating that his source for firearms was Hampton-El. Two days later Salem went to El-Gabrowny's house and found Shinawy already there. The three agreed that they would try to secure a "safehouse" for constructing bombs, and El-Gabrowny committed to attempt to obtain detonators from Afghanistan. A few days later, Shinawy summoned Salem to the Abu Bakr Mosque where he introduced Salem to Hampton-El. Salem and Shinaway explained to Hampton-El that they were making bombs but that they were having trouble getting detonators. Hampton-El said that he had access to "ready-made bombs" for $900 to $1,000 apiece. Tr. 4932-33, 6485-86. He also offered to obtain a handgun for Salem. A few days later Shinaway gave Salem a handgun presumably from Hampton-El. In early July 1992, a rift developed between Salem and the FBI, and it was agreed that Salem's undercover investigation would be terminated.


It was revealed during the trial that in addition to Salem, an Egyptian spy was among the conspirators. It is not clear from the court opinion whether he was working with the FBI at the time of the bombing, but it would certainly be unusual for a government espionage agent not to be working directly with either the Egyptian or U.S. government. He testified against the others at trial.

In late 1992, the paramilitary training resumed, led by Siddig Ali and Hampton-El on weekends between October 1992 and February 1993. Defendants Amir and Fadil Abdelgani and Elhassan all participated in the training camp, as did Abdo Haggag, an Egyptian spy who testified for the Government during the trial.


Another suspicious event was when the group sought to obtain detonators and guns from another government informant working for the U.S. Navy Investigative Service. It was not disclosed whether the conspirators actually obtained the detonators from him. The informant’s involvement indicates that the government was yet again in position to stop the plot and arrest the conspirators, but mysteriously did not do so.


After the bombing the FBI paid Salem one million dollars and hired him back as an informant. It is highly unusual for the government to pay an informant up front. In fact, such payments are almost unheard of, especially to a foreign national who could just skip the country with the money, without fulfilling his end of the bargain, and never be seen again. The amount of the payment and the circumstances suggest that the payment was for services already rendered. Apparently, someone in the U.S. government was quite pleased with Salem’s performance prior to the bombing.


Salem probably sensed that he may be double crossed and so taped his conversations with the FBI after the bombing. In one tape Salem is heard upbraiding the FBI for allowing the bombing, which suggests that they were in a position to stop it. Salem told the New York Times that the FBI had planned on substituting an inert substance for the explosive and then arresting the bombers as they tried to bomb the World Trade Center. Such a plan indicates that the FBI was close enough to the operation to be involved in the construction of the very bomb used.


The substitution plan was a hair brained scheme that simply does not ring true. Nobody in their right mind would take such unnecessarily risks with the lives of innocent citizens. Under federal law it is a felony punishable by up to twenty years in prison to enter into a seditious conspiracy. The plotters had already entered into the conspiracy long before the actual bombing and they could have been arrested at any time for that offence. In fact, seditious conspiracy was the primary charge to which the principles in the bombing were ultimately convicted. All the evidence necessary to prove that charge was present before the bomb was exploded. It is not necessary that the conspirators actually complete the crime they have agreed to commit in order to be guilty of conspiracy. Conspiracy is simply an agreement to commit a crime, and the FBI had ample evidence of such an agreement before the bomb went off. Presumably the FBI knows the law. They could have taken down the group long in advance of the actual planting of the bomb. The substitution scheme sounds more like a cover story to explain why they allowed the bombing to happen when they so obviously could have stopped it. That is the only reasonable explanation for actions of the FBI.


As reported in the December 15, 1993 Chicago Tribune, Salem said on the tape that he personally built the bomb. His construction of the bomb had to have been done before he was taken off the case. If Salem was taken off the case after he built the bomb, how did the FBI expect to substitute inert powder in place of the explosives? There is only one reasonable answer: the FBI had no intention of stopping the bombing. The FBI pulled Salem off the case for the very purpose of allowing the WTC to be bombed. Let us review the known facts so far: (1) Salem, working undercover for the FBI, builds a bomb for terrorists to use to bomb the World Trade Center; (2) The FBI knows the bomb had been constructed and that it is ready to go, yet they pull Salem off the case, and thus lose the ability to thwart the bombing; (3) The terrorists bomb the World Trade Center, killing 6 and wounding 1,000; (4) The FBI springs into action to find the culprits, when they knew all along who they were, their own informant built the bomb; (4) They pay their informant one million dollars, purportedly to go back undercover to help them find the culprits, whose identity the FBI already knew.


The FBI has told the press that they were able to arrest the culprits in the bombing when Mohammad Salameh, showed up at the truck rental shop to pick up the deposit for the truck used in the bombing. In fact, as explained above, the FBI had inside information on the plot and already knew who was behind it.


Mohammad Salameh, who has since been convicted along with others for the bombing, has alleged that the Israeli Mossad was behind the bombing. He alleges that Josie Hadad was the woman who masterminded the bombing. The phone number Salmeh wrote down when he rented the truck came back to Hadas. The FBI states that the Josie Hadas is a fictional character; that she does not exist. What is odd, however, is that eyewitnesses have seen her; she was described to a reporter as “a motherly Arab woman about twice the age of Salameh, who moved into the apartment before Christmas.” She was described by others as a 50 year old cleaning woman. If she is only a cleaning lady how could she so easily disappear? Why would the FBI say that she does not exist, when eyewitnesses have seen her? It is certainly possible that Salmeh is simply trying to implicate Israel by alleging that Hadad was an Israeli. When did he come upon that information? It is unrealistic to suppose that he believed her to be a Mossad agent during the plot. There is evidence that an alleged Iraqi who got away, Ramzi Yousef, was also one of the principles in the plot. Why hasn’t Salameh implicated him? Apparently, the whole story has not yet come to light. In the end we must ask cui bono (who benefits)? The answer is clear: Israel.


Both the 1993 and 2001 World Trade Center disasters have the unmistakable claw marks of Zionists all over them. These Zionists are evil and powerful, but they are fools. “The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works.” Psalm 14:1. These Godless Zionists stage catastrophes like a bad magician. Their whole existence is based on a denial of God, and because they inevitably ignore God’s inviolable laws of nature, their schemes are easy to detect. They always leave a trail behind for those who have eyes to see and ears to hear.


On July 4, 2001, two months before the September 11 WTC attack, Osama Bin Laden flew to the American hospital in Dubai for 10 days for kidney dialysis treatment. At the time he was under indictment by the U.S. Government for masterminding the bombing of the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998. According to the French newspaper Le Figaro, during his stay in the hospital he was visited by the local CIA station chief and another CIA agent. These disclosures are known to come from French intelligence, which has an interest in revealing the CIA/Bin Laden link in order to keep the U.S. from extending the war into Iraq and elsewhere. Not surprisingly, the CIA denies the occurrence of the event and the American hospital denies that Bin Laden was ever a patient at the hospital.


Where is Osama Bin Laden now? Respected author Gordon Thomas has written a book titled “Seeds of Fire,” in which he states that Beijing had a role in the Sept. 11 attack on America. Thomas is a highly respected investigative journalist from Ireland and is the author of 38 books. Thomas reveals in his book that on Sept. 11, 2001, the very day of the WTC attack, a transport plane from Beijing landed in Kabul. On board the plane were senior officers of the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Bureau of State Security. The mission of the Chinese delegation was to sign a deal with the Taliban, which was reportedly brokered by Osama Bin Laden, to provide the Afghans with missile tracking technology, state of the art communications and air defense systems. The Chinese had access to such technologies primarily as a result of espionage against the U.S. and as a result of the foolish U.S. government policy of granting Communist China most favored nation trading status. In return for the Chinese assistance, the Taliban ordered the Muslim separatists in northwest China to stop their activities.


After the agreement between the Taliban and the Communist Chinese government Osama was flown to a safe haven inside Red China. Immediately after the WTC attacks, CIA Director George Tenet met with Lt. General Ahmed, the head of Pakistan’s intelligence service, who briefed Tenet on the Chinese/Taliban cooperation. Tenet immediately informed President George W. Bush of the China/Taliban link. What did Bush do? On December 28, 2001, while Americans were preoccupied with the holiday season, he granted China “permanent normal trade status!” He was not done! On January 2, 2002, Bush announced that he relaxed limits on supercomputer exports from the United States, which was a huge benefit to both China and Russia. This is the same George W. Bush who after the 9-11 attacks stated: “ from this day onward, any nation that continues to harbor and support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime.”


The Chinese and Russian governments has been supporters of Islamic terrorist groups for decades. Yasser Arafat is in fact a communist puppet. In a 1982 speech Arafat stated “we look to you comrade, the Central Committee of the Soviet Communist Party and the socialist bloc, full of hope, as trend to friend.... in considering the question of liberation and progress in the world.” Arafat even commended the Soviets for their invasion of Islamic Afghanistan! In Afghanistan, the Taliban has been supported by the Chinese, while the Northern Alliance are long time allies of the Russians. Any truly independent anti-communist Islamic leaders are targeted for assassination, as happened in the case of Abdul Haq.


The Chinese state run propaganda machine is reveling in the 9-11 attacks in New York and Washington. They have produced books, films, and video games glorifying the strikes as a humbling blow against the United States, which they describe as an arrogant nation. Video discs filled with lurid images along with dramatic opera music and even the theme from Jaws have been injected into the Chinese markets by the Communist government in the wake of the attacks. “Disc after disc bear the imprimatur of the Communist Party-controlled media. The most popular DVDs have been produced by the Xinhua information agency, Beijing Television and China Central Television.” One video has the commentator jeeringly stating: "This is the America the whole world has wanted to see.”


The Soviet Union, who voted for the establishment of the state of Israel and were early on strong supporters of Israel, have seemingly done an about face and are now supporters of Islamic terrorists bent on the destruction of Israel. That is just one example of the dialectic materialism of communism at work. The communists create the poison and the antidote in the same laboratory. They use the Islamic terrorists attacks as an excuse for further Zionist advances. The facade of anti-Israel policies that subsequently developed in communist countries has been for public consumption. In fact the same Zionist forces have inspired and controlled all communist countries, including both Communist China and Communist Russia. Marxist communism comes straight from the Talmud. Hard as it may be to believe, it is true that the same group of puppeteers are pulling the strings for the Islamic terrorists and the retaliatory response by the countries that are the targets of the terrorist attacks, including Israel and the United States. All the while the puppeteers are inching toward their Zionist goal of world domination.


The U.S. war on terrorism in Northern Afghanistan in response to the 9-11 WTC and Pentagon attacks is a good example. The U.S. ran the Taliban forces out of Northern Afghanistan (actually many of the Taliban simply switched allegiance to the Northern Alliance when it became clear that the Taliban was the losing team). The Northern alliance was handed control of northern Afghanistan by the U.S. The Northern Alliance then welcomed in the Russian army. The Russians now control most of northern Afghanistan. The U.S. did the dirty work, and the Russians get the spoils. And who controls the Russians? The Jewish Zionist, of course. You see, step-by-step they are achieving their goals.


The evidence of Jewish orchestrated government malfeasance in the 9-11 WTC destruction is increasingly coming to light. President George W. Bush stated the following during his November 10, 2001 address before the UN General Assembly: “Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th - malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty.”


Why is George Bush so concerned about discussions of a conspiracy? The answer will become apparent as you read Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel recount the chronology of events on 9-11-01, which reveal George Bush’s suspicious conduct that day:

Associated Press reporter Sonya Ross was one of the journalists covering Bush's trip to Florida on the morning of 9-11. Ms. Ross was either on her way to the Booker School or already there when she learned of the first WTC crash: “My cell phone rang as President Bush's motorcade coursed toward Emma E. Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Fla. A colleague reported that a plane had crashed into the World Trade Center in New York. No further information. I called the AP desk in Washington, seeking details. Same scant information. But I knew it had to be grim. I searched for a White House official to question, but none was on hand until 9:05 a.m.” Ms. Ross searched for a White House official' because she knew Bush's people would be better informed than the Associated Press.

President Bush is not an ordinary person. He travels with an entire staff. They are responsible for receiving, filtering and conveying administrative and military information. Chief of Staff Andrew Card organizes and coordinates these staff members and communicates with the President. In addition, Bush has the Secret Service, which is responsible for his safety. The members of this support team have the best communications equipment in the world. They maintain contact with, or can easily reach, Bush's cabinet, the National Military Command Center (NMCC) in the Pentagon, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and Secret Service agents who have stayed behind at the White House, etc.

Since the President's information system is far more extensive and sophisticated than what is available to a reporter, it seems more than plausible that by the time Ms. Ross heard about the first WTC crash - that is, as the Bush motorcade was speeding to Booker Elementary School - the president already knew about this tragic event. Public sources confirm this. ABC journalist John Cochran was traveling with the President. He reported on ABC TV on Tuesday morning, [here he is talking to Peter Jennings]: "Peter, as you know, the president's down in Florida talking about education. He got out of his hotel suite this morning, was about to leave, reporters saw the White House chief of staff, Andy Card, whisper into his ear. The reporter said to the president, 'Do you know what's going on in New York?' He said he did, and he said he will have something about it later. His first event is about half an hour at an elementary school in Sarasota, Florida." So Bush knew about the first WTC incident before leaving his hotel.

What else did he [Bush] know? This question is answered by something Vice President Richard Cheney revealed, probably unwittingly, on MEET THE PRESS, Sunday, September 16th. Even without John Cochran's report on ABC, Cheney's comments constitute evidence that before President Bush went to the Booker School he knew a plane had been hijacked and then crashed into the WTC. Cheney was talking with MEET THE PRESS journalist Tim Russert about the flight path of American Flight 77, which struck the Pentagon. Here's the exchange:

“VICE PRES. CHENEY: ...As best we can tell, they [American Flight 77] came initially at the White House and...

"MR. RUSSERT: The plane actually circled the White House?

"VICE PRES. CHENEY: Didn't circle it, but was headed on a track into it. The Secret Service has an arrangement with the F.A.A. They had open lines after the World Trade Center was... "
"MR. RUSSERT: Tracking it by radar.

"VICE PRES. CHENEY: And when it entered the danger zone and looked like it was headed for the White House was when they grabbed me and evacuated me to the basement... (Etc.)" MEET THE PRESS Transcript

It appears that Cheney may have blurted out the crucial fact that the Secret Service had an open line to the FAA, then realized he was talking too much and stopped before completing his sentence. But if he did indeed talk too much, he also stopped talking too late. It is obvious that the sentence should have ended with the word 'hit' or something similar.


* * *

Therefore, by the time American Flight 11 crashed into the World Trade Center, around 8:46, and most likely before that happened, the Secret Service knew what the FAA knew. So, what did the FAA know? The FAA admits that at 8:20 it 'suspected' that American Flight 11 had been hijacked. And according to the official story released Sept. 14th: "8:40 [the] FAA notifie[s] NEADS (the Northeast Air Defense Sector) of NORAD, the military's civil defense system, about Flight 11, [i.e., that it had been hijacked.]" Newsday 23 September 2001.

Therefore, based on the official story, the Secret Service knew by 8:40 or before that Flight 11 had been hijacked. And since the FAA was tracking Flight 11, as was the National Military Command Center, which is notified of hijackings and has access to radar from all over the country, it is definite that at 8:46 the Secret Service knew a hijacked plane had crashed into the World Trade Center.

So according to the official story, before the President entered the Booker School, indeed, apparently before he left his hotel, the Secret Service knew that, for the first time in US history, the country had been attacked by terrorists from the air.
The Secret Service, which employs more than 4,000 people, has several responsibilities. The most important is protecting the President. And surely, this means first of all keeping him out of unnecessary danger because prevention is better than cure. This is especially true in regard to certain dangers:

"During the cold war, when security agents used to play war games involving terrorist threats to the White House, the one unsolvable problem was a commercial airliner loaded with explosives working its way into the landing pattern at Washington National Airport, then veering off for a suicide plunge into the White House." (TIME Magazine) The Secret Service has long been aware that one of the trickiest security dangers is posed by a suicide attack from a hijacked commercial airplane from a nearby airport. On a day when planes were being hijacked from different airports and crashing into buildings, a top security precaution would be to keep the President away from a publicly announced appointment at a building near an airport. The Booker School is fewer than 5 miles from the Sarasota-Bradenton International Airport.


Why did they allow George Walker Bush to keep his scheduled plan to appear at the school. Perhaps he knew he knew more about the intended targets and knew he was in no danger. How could I say such a thing? Let us look at Bush’s conduct that day. The Associated Press reported on September 12th the following: "In Sarasota, Florida, Bush was reading to children in a classroom at 9:05 a.m. when his chief of staff, Andrew Card, whispered into his ear. The president briefly turned somber before he resumed reading. He addressed the tragedy about a half-hour later."


Did you catch that? Bush is now notified that a second plane has crashed into the WTC and he continues to read a children’s story. As we have established, he likely already knew that the first strike was in fact a terrorist attack and now it is confirmed with a second plane hitting the second tower, and he reacts to this by resuming his reading of a children’s story! Why would the President of the United States not immediately take action? The answer did not come until 2 months later during a December 4, 2001 town meeting in Sarasota, Florida. Lets read what he said directly from the official transcript on the White House web site: "Well, Jordan, you're not going to believe what state I was in when I heard about the terrorist attack. I was in Florida. And my Chief of Staff, Andy Card -- actually, I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works. I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on. And I used to fly, myself, and I said, well, there's one terrible pilot. I said, it must have been a horrible accident. But I was whisked off there, I didn't have much time to think about it. And I was sitting in the classroom, and Andy Card, my Chief of Staff, who is sitting over here, walked in and said, "A second plane has hit the tower, America is under attack."


George Bush, said that he saw on TV the first plane hit the first tower. Whose video was he watching? No media outlet in the country had a video of the first plane crash available to broadcast until several hours later, yet Bush is watching the crash within minutes. The only people who would have had a video available that quickly would have been those who knew in advance what was going to happen and were set up to film it. Furthermore, Vice President Cheney stated they had a direct line with the FAA who had suspected at 8:20 a.m. that the first plane was hijacked and notified NORAD of that fact at 8:40 a.m. The fact that the plane was hijacked was confirmed when it plowed into the first WTC tower at 8:46 a.m. Yet President Bush, who himself is a pilot and upon viewing the film, has the bizarre reaction: “I said, well, there's one terrible pilot. I said, it must have been a horrible accident.” He already knew that the plane had likely been hijacked, because the Secret Service had an open line with the FAA who had information that the plane was hijacked before it hit the tower. Yet upon seeing the hijacked plane crash into the largest man made free standing structure in the world on a clear day with miles of visibility, he said: “there's one terrible pilot”and further said that “must have been a horrible accident”! That does not sound credible. It gets worse, when he is told about the second plane crash and is explicitly told by his chief of staff that “America is under attack," he continues to read a children’s story. That is not the conduct of a leader, that is the conduct of a puppet, who is pretending not to know what is really happening and is waiting for instructions on what he should do next. He is so controlled and his conscience so seared that one of the most horrendous attacks to befall this great country does not even phase him. Remember, before he was told of the second crash, he had seen a video of the first crash and his response had been to do nothing regarding the clear national security issues. Then, when he is told of the second crash, he didn’t miss a beat, he continued where he left off reading the children’s story. The most amazing and revealing thing about this whole episode is that there has not been a single word about this in the mass media. The puppet masters not only control Bush, they control the media. President Bush has not been asked a single question about his bizarre conduct or his incredible statements. That should give the reader some idea of the power and control of the conspirators.


Those behind the conspiracy are so concerned about keeping a lid on things that Bush and Vice President Cheney have even lobbied Congress not to look too hard at the cause of the 9-11 tragedy. The lame excuse Bush has given for the lobbying effort is that a full investigation would “take resources and personnel away from the effort in the war on terrorism.” Their lobbying effort is in reality a rather transparent attempt to get Congress to go along with a coverup.


Congress seems willing to honor Bush’s request. Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle has promised that he would “limit the scope and overall review of what happened.” What Daschle means by that is that he will ensure that they never get to the bottom of what really happened. Congressman Porter Goss and Senator Bob Graham, who each head the intelligence committees in their respective houses of Congress, both assured the president that the joint congressional investigation that began in February 2002 would be a forward looking inquiry only. They will only look to bring about needed government reforms. The question becomes how can they determine what reforms need to be made without first understanding what went wrong? The obvious answer is they do not care to find out what went wrong, because either they are afraid what it may turn up or they know what it will turn up because they are in on it. In essence, President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and the Congressional leadership have agreed to a coverup.


What is the evidence that Congress and the President are trying to hide from the American public? For starters, six weeks prior to the WTC destruction, David Schippers, chief investigative counsel for the Clinton impeachment, had learned from FBI agents in Minnesota and Chicago that a massive attack had been planned for lower Manhattan. Schippers attempted to warn Attorney General John Ashcroft. Department of Justice officials, however, spurned Schippers’ attempt to forward the information to Ashcroft. The reason that Schippers tried to warn Ashcroft directly was that the FBI agents, whom he was representing, were frustrated by the lack of action being taken by the FBI and the Department of Justice when they went through their chain of command to try to put a stop to the obvious threat.


The planned attack was well known within the FBI. As explained by one of the FBI agents, the degree of the knowledge within the FBI is evidenced by the fact that “within 24 hours [of the WTC attack] the Bureau had about 20 people identified, and photos were sent out to the news media. Obviously this information was as available in the files and somebody was sitting on it.”


One terrorist conspirator was already in custody prior the September 11 attack. Zacarias Mousaui was arrested on August 16, 2001 by the FBI after he attempted to receive flight training for a Boeing 747 jumbo jet. Mousaui was not the brightest bulb in this terror chandelier. He claimed he was from France, but when the flight instructor spoke French to him he did not understand what the instructor was saying. He discussed with the flight instructors the amount of fuel carried by a 747 and how much damage that would do if it hit something. Mousaui was not concerned with learning how to take off or landing, he only wanted to learn how to steer the plane. It was so obvious to the flight school employees that Mousaui was a potential hijacker that they called the FBI, who in turn arrested him.


When Pan Am International Flight Academy raised questions with the FAA about another conspirator’s, Hani Hanjours’, inability to speak English, the international language of aviation, an FAA representative sat in class and observed Hanjour and discussed with the school getting someone to tutor him in English. It turned out, however, Hanjour did not need any English language skills to plow American Airlines flight 77 into the Pentagon.

Angry witnesses reported seeing three separate groups of men at three different locations celebrating as they watched the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center. One group of men were seen celebrating in Union City. The witnesses reported their license plate to the police, who later arrested the men. Witnesses also saw three men in Liberty State Park in Jersey City filming the attack on the World Trade Center. After the attack the men were seen cheering and jumping up and down. Those men were also caught by the police and arrested several hours after the attack. Sources close to the investigation stated that it appeared that the men were involved in the attack and knew ahead of time what was going to happen.


Witnesses saw another group of five who were filming the smoking New York skyline. The men seeming quite happy with the spectacle of the burning towers. A neighbor witnessed the men shouting cries of joy and mockery. They all had prior knowledge of the attack and were set up to film it before the first plane hit the World Trade Center. One of the “be on lookout”(BOLO) messages from the FBI was: “Three individuals with van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion. FBI Newark Field Office requests that, if the van is located, hold for prints and detain individuals.” Another FBI BOLO was: “Vehicle possibly related to New York terrorist attack. White, 2000 Chevrolet van with New Jersey registration with 'Urban Moving Systems' sign on back seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of first impact of jetliner into World Trade Center.”


Eight hours later those men were arrested and were found to possess maps and other evidence that linked them to the attack. One of the arrestees had $4,700 in cash hidden in his sock. Another passenger was carrying two foreign passports. As reported by ABC News:

[P]erhaps the biggest surprise for the officers came when the five men identified themselves as Israeli citizens. According to the police report, one of the passengers told the officers they had been on the West Side Highway in Manhattan “during the incident” - referring to the World Trade Center attack.


ABC News reported that the driver of the van told the officers: “We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.” ABC News also reported that: “The FBI also questioned Urban Moving's owner. His attorney insists that his client answered all of the FBI's questions. But when FBI agents tried to interview him again a few days later, he was gone.” The owner had cleared out of his New Jersey home and hurriedly fled with his family back to Israel. Three months later, ABC News program 20/20 photographed the inside of Urban Moving. “[I]t looked as if the business had been shut down in a big hurry. Cell phones were lying around; office phones were still connected; and the property of dozens of clients remained in the warehouse.”


It is suspicious enough that each of these men were Israelis linked to Israeli owned moving companies out of New York and New Jersey. The real smoking gun is the fact that all of the arrested Israelis were found to be Mossad agents, and the moving companies for which they worked were determined to be Mossad front operations.


An indication of the power and control of Israel over the U.S. Government is the fact that all of the Israeli Mossad agents who were caught celebrating over the carnage of the burning twin towers were deported back to Israel. Incidently, the United States has no extradition treaty with Israel, so the deported culprits will never be brought to justice in this world. The U.S. government was under no legal compulsion to deport the Mossad agents. In fact, the U.S. is now holding many suspects indefinitely without filing any charges against them and without allowing them legal counsel, because they are considered illegal enemy combatants of war. It is no surprise that none of those detained enemy combatants are Jews.


The evidence of Israeli involvement in the 9-11-01 attacks does not end there. A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) memo, time stamped September 11, 2001, has surfaced which gives specific details of a shooting aboard hijacked American Airlines Flight 11 which departed from Logan Airport in Boston and crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center on 9-11-01. The FAA memo in pertinent part stated: “The American Airlines FAA Principal Security Inspector (PSI) was notified by Suzanne Clark of American Airlines Corporate Headquarters, that an on board flight attendant contacted American Airlines Operations Center and informed that a passenger located in seat 10B shot and killed a passenger in seat 9B . . . The passenger killed was Daniel Lewin, shot by passenger Satam Al Suqami. One bullet was reported to have been fired." The FAA has tried to explain that the information in the memo was erroneous. However, Steve Elson, a former FAA airport-security inspector, told World Net Daily that he personally knows the author of the memo, and he trusts the accuracy of the memo despite the FAAs claims that it was inaccurate. He stated that the memo was hand delivered to FAA Administrator Jane Garvey. Elson pointed out that in addition to his personal knowledge of the memo author’s competence and veracity, "[t]he specificity of the wording – passenger seat numbers, who shot whom and the firing of a single bullet - makes an error unlikely." Think about it, an on board flight attendant gave detailed information identifying by name the victim, the shooter and where they each were seated. That indicates that the flight attendant was giving notice of an actual occurrence to which she was probably an eyewitness, it was not just her imagination.


Why is the fact that one of the highjackers had a gun significant? Remember, the 9-11-01 attacks were a carefully planned and orchestrated. They could not take the chance of anyone getting caught on one of the planes before the planes took off. The gun toting highjacker must have been certain that he would make it on the plane with that gun. In order to get through the usual metal detectors he would have to have had help from the airport security. The assistance by airport security must have been an integral part of the plan. That is why is the FAA and the major media are so concerned about covering up the fact that one of the highjackers had a gun. The FAA and the media do not want any link to be made between the highjackers and the security company at each of the airports. Because, if the connection were made, it would implicate Israel.


The security at Boston’s Logan airport on 9-11-01 was being provided by ICTS, through its wholly owned subsidiary Huntleigh USA Corp. Boston’s Logan airport was the departure point for American Airlines Flight 11, which crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center and United Airlines flight 175, which crashed into the South Tower of the World Trade Center. The ICTS website reveals that ICTS provides security for the Washington’s Dulles airport, which was the departure point for American Airlines flight 77, which crashed into the Pentagon. The ICTS website also reveals that ICTS provides security for Newark International Airport, which was the departure point for United Airlines flight 93, which was the fourth plane highjacked on 9-11-01 and which crashed in Somerset County Pennsylvania, southeast of Pittburgh. Interestingly, ICTS also provides airport security for Moscow, St. Petersburg, and other Eastern European communist block cities.
What is the significance of ICTS? ICTS is an Israeli security company owned by Ezra Harel and registered in the Netherlands. According to the ICTS website “ICTS (International Consultants on Targeted Security) was founded in 1982 by a select group of Israeli business people, former military commanding officers and veterans of government intelligence and security agencies, as a privately owned company dedicated to the provision of security services.” Many of the ICTS personnel are ex-Shin Bet officers. Shin Bet is the Israeli counter-intelligence and internal security service. Richard Reid, the British man suspected of trying to detonate explosives in his shoe on board a flight bound for the U.S. in December 2001, flew from Ben Gurion airport in Tel Aviv, Israel to De Gaul Airport in Paris, where he boarded the flight to the U.S. It was during the flight to the U.S. that he was apprehended as he tried to light the explosives in his shoe. ICTS was responsible for security for the De Gaul Airport in Paris and supplied the highjack profile software for the Israeli government used at the Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv, Israel.


So the picture becomes clearer as to how the hijackers could make certain that they could board American Airlines flight 11 at Boston’s Logan Airport with a gun. They had inside help in the form of ICTS. It is curious that both flights which struck the World Trade Center Towers originated from Logan Airport. ICTS also provided security for the departure airports of the other two hijacked flights on 9-11-01. It is certainly possible that there were weapons smuggled on the other planes with the help of ICTS and that those facts have been suppressed. The fact that ICTS, by its own admission, is made up of “a select group of Israeli business people, former military commanding officers and veterans of government intelligence and security agencies,” is just more evidence pointing to Israel as the culprit behind the 9-11-01 attacks.


20 citizens of Colombia and 15 citizens from the Philippines died in the World Trade Center attacks. The death toll for Israelis citizens would be expected to be much higher than that. New York is the center of international Jewish financial power, and the World Trade Center is at its epicenter. The international Jewish involvement in banking and finance is legendary. Two of the largest and richest firms in New York are Goldman-Sachs and Solomon Brothers. Both firms have offices in several floors in the twin towers of the World Trade Center. Many executives in those firms regularly commute to and from Israel conducting international banking and business. One would expect the Israeli death toll to be catastrophic. In fact, Israel first announced that 4,000 Israelis citizens were suspected to have been killed in the WTC attacks. That number was based upon the number of Israelis who worked at the WTC or had business in or adjacent to the WTC towers. Surprisingly, Alon Pinkas, Israel's consul general confirmed that only three Israelis were killed in the 9-11-01 WTC attacks. Two Israelis were killed in the two planes which crashed into the towers, and one Israeli, who had been visiting one of the World Trade Center towers on business, was killed. Only three of potentially thousands of Israelis working in the WTC were killed on 9-11! How is that possible? 9-11-01 was not at Jewish holiday; so where were the Israelis who ordinarily would have been working in the World Trade Center?


The love of money is the root of all evil. 1 Timothy 6:10. One way to determine who is behind a criminal enterprise is to follow the money. This technique can be used to determine who is behind the World Trade Center destruction. You might ask, how could anyone make money on the destruction of the World Trade Center? There is a type of investing, whereby investors can make money if a stock goes down in price. In the case of the events of September 11, 2001 where jets from American Airlines and United Airlines were hijacked and crashed into the Pentagon and the World Trade Center there was some unusual activity regarding the purchase of large amounts of put options on those stocks. Put options are highly leveraged investment instruments which go up in value when stock goes down in price. In addition to the massive purchase of put options on United and American Airlines, there were also large put option purchases made on the stock of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. and Merrill Lynch & Co., which each occupied 22 floors of the World Trade Center. As expected by the conspirators, after the destruction of the World Trade Center the prices of each of the aforementioned stocks plummeted, making millions for those who had purchased the put options.


To give you some idea of the activity regarding these options in the four trading days before the September 11th attack 12,215 put options were purchased on Merrill Lynch stock. The average daily volume of put options on Merrill Lynch stock prior to those four days was 252 put options per day. That was a 1200 % increase in put options trading just prior to the attack. As a result of the drop in price’s of Merrill Lynch stock’s those put options generated a profit of approximately $5.5 million. That $5.5 million was the profit on just the trades on Merrill Lynch put options.


These put option trades are trades of someone who had inside information from one who was intimately involved in the details of the attack. They knew not only the target, the World Trade Center, but they knew which specific airlines would be used to target those buildings. The San Francisco Chronicle is the only paper in the country to report that investors have yet to collect more than $2.5 million in profit they made trading options in the stock of United Airlines before September 11th terrorist attacks. The traders don’t dare show up now, because the voluminous put option trading obviously indicates inside knowledge about the attacks. Apparently, the suspension of trading for four days after the attacks made it impossible for them to quickly claim their prize before the investigators caught on. Now it is too late for them to profit. The fact that they would walk away from $2.5 million clearly indicates that they are anything but innocent.


How do these trades help us identify who is behind the attacks? Investigators have discovered that an investment banking firm known as Alex Brown Inc. purchased many of the aforementioned put options on United Airlines stock. Alex Brown Inc. is America’s oldest investment bank. The kicker is that A. B. “Buzzy” Krongard, the Executive Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), is the former Chairman of Alex Brown Inc. Krongard, made some revealing statements in a recent Washington Post article. He stated that if you go back to the CIA’s origins during World War II in the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) “the whole OSS was really nothing but Wall Street bankers and lawyers.”


Those insiders who purchased the put options on Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. and Merrill Lynch & Co. stock thought they were betting on a sure thing. How could they be so sure, though, that both towers would be destroyed by the planes and thus destroy both the Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. and Merrill Lynch & Co. offices? There would always be the chance that the planes would hit the towers and burn areas not occupied by either Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. or Merrill Lynch & Co. It would be far from certain that the two planes would do enough damage to cause both towers to collapse. The large put option stake suggests that they viewed the collapse of the towers as a sure thing. How could they be so certain the towers would collapse when the WTC architect designed the towers to survive just such collisions. The reason that they knew is that the towers were preset with demolition charges that brought them to the ground. Eyewitness accounts of bombs that exploded inside the World Trade Center before the collapse of the Twin Towers of the WTC have been completely ignored by the major media outlets. Christopher Bollyn, a reporter for the American Free Press, wrote the following article regarding ear and eyewitness accounts of explosions causing the collapse of the WTC Towers.

Despite reports from numerous eyewitnesses and experts, including news reporters on the scene, who heard or saw explosions immediately before the collapse of the World Trade Center, there has been virtual silence in the mainstream media.

Television viewers watching the horrific events of Sept. 11 saw evidence of explosions before the towers collapsed. Televised images show what appears to be a huge explosion occurring near ground level, in the vicinity of the 47-story Salomon Brothers Building, known as WTC 7, prior to the collapse of the first tower.

Van Romero, an explosives expert and former director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center at New Mexico Tech, said on Sept. 11, "My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse."

The collapse of the structures resembled the controlled implosions used to demolish old structures and was "too methodical to be a chance result of airplanes colliding with the structures," Romero told The Albuquerque Journal hours after the attack.

Implosions are violent collapses inwards, which are used to demolish buildings in areas of high density, to prevent damage to surrounding buildings. Precision-timed explosives are placed on strategic load-bearing columns and beams to cause the controlled collapse.

Demolition experts say that towers are the most difficult buildings to bring down in a controlled manner. A tower tends to fall like a tree, unless the direction of its fall is controlled by directional charges. The WTC towers "smokestacked" neatly, falling within the boundaries of their foundations.

Skeptics say this could not have happened coincidentally and it must have been caused by strategically placed and precisely timed internal charges. Videotape images may reveal these internal charges precipitating the controlled demolition of the towers and WTC 7.

Romero is vice president of research at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, which studies explosive materials and the effects of explosions on buildings, aircraft and other structures, and often assists in forensic investigations into terrorist attacks, often by setting off similar explosions and studying the effects.

After being hit by the aircraft, the twin towers appeared to be stable. Then without warning, at 9:58 a.m. the south tower imploded vertically downwards, 53 minutes after being hit. At 10:28, 88 minutes after being struck, the north tower collapsed.

"It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event like that," Romero said. If explosions did cause the towers to collapse, "It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points," he said.

"One of the things terrorist events are noted for is a diversionary attack and secondary device," Romero said. Attackers detonate an initial, diversionary explosion, in this case the collision of the planes into the towers, which brings emergency personnel to the scene, then detonate a second explosion.

Ten days after the attack, following criticism of his initial remarks, Romero did an about-face in his analysis of the collapse, "Certainly the fire is what caused the building to fail," he told the Journal on Sept. 21.

The twin towers were struck by Boeing 767's carrying approximately 23,000 gallons of fuel.

However, there is other information that lends credence to Romero's controversial scenario.

One eyewitness whose office is near the World Trade Center told AFP that he was standing among a crowd of people on Church Street, about two-and-a-half blocks from the South tower, when he saw "a number of brief light sources being emitted from inside the building between floors 10 and 15." He saw about six of these brief flashes, accompanied by "a crackling sound" before the tower collapsed. Each tower had six central support columns.

One of the first firefighters in the stricken second tower, Louie Cacchioli, 51, told People Weekly on Sept. 24: "I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building."

Kim White, 32, an employee on the 80th floor, also reported hearing an explosion. "All of a sudden the building shook, then it started to sway. We didn't know what was going on," she told People. "We got all our people on the floor into the stairwell . . . at that time we all thought it was a fire . . .We got down as far as the 74th floor . . . then there was another explosion."

The accepted theory is that as the fires raged in the towers, the steel cores in each building were heated to 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit, causing the support beams to buckle.

A lead engineer who designed the World Trade Center Towers expressed shock that the towers collapsed after being hit by passenger jets.

"I designed it for a 707 to hit it," Lee Robertson, the project's structural engineer said. The Boeing 707 has a fuel capacity of more than 23,000 gallons, comparable to the 767's 23,980-gallon fuel capacity.

Another architect of the WTC, Aaron Swirski, lives in Israel and spoke to Jerusalem Post Radio after the attack: "It was designed around that eventuality to survive this kind of attack," he said.

Hyman Brown, a University of Colorado civil engineering professor and the World Trade Center's construction manager, watched in confusion as the towers came down. "It was over-designed to withstand almost anything including hurricanes, high winds, bombings and an airplane hitting it," he said.

Brown told AFP that although the buildings were designed to withstand "a 150-year storm" and the im pact of a Boeing 707, he said the jet fuel burning at 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit weakened the steel. Brown ex plained that the south tower collapsed first as it was struck lower with more weight above the impact area.

Brown told AFP that he "did not buy" the theory that the implosion was caused by the fires sucking the air out of the lower floors, which has been speculated.

The contractor who is reported to have been the first on the WTC collapse scene to cart away the rubble that remains is a company that specializes in the scientific demolition of large buildings, Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI) of Baltimore, headed by Mark Loizeaux.

CDI is the same contractor that demolished and hauled away the shell of the bombed Oklahoma City Murrah building, actions that prevented independent investigators from pursuing evidence on leads suggesting that there were bombs set off inside the building.

In February 2000, a federal grand jury indicted Mark Loizeaux, Douglas Loizeaux and Controlled Demolition, Inc. on charges of falsely reporting campaign contributions by asking family members and CDI employees to donate to the campaign of Rep. Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.).

The Baltimore Sun reported that the illegal contributions allegedly occurred between 1996 and 1998. The Loizeaux brothers and CDI were acquitted in September 2000.

Cleaning up the estimated 1.2 million tons of rubble will reportedly cost $7 billion and take up to a year.

Removing the debris has also been controversial. The police said that some scrap metal has been diverted to mob-controlled businesses rather than the dump where investigators are examining rubble for clues and human remains.

The second plane nearly missed the South Tower, cutting through a corner. Most of its fuel burned in an outside explosion. However, this building collapsed first, long before the North Tower, into which a similar plane entered completely.


Seismographs at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades, N.Y., 21 miles north of the WTC, recorded two spikes in the seismic record from Sept. 11, which indicate two huge bursts of energy shook the ground beneath the World Trade Center's twin towers. A large ground coupled explosion measuring 2.1 on the Richter scale was recorded just before the collapse of the first (south) tower. A second large ground coupled explosion which registered 2.3 on the Richter scale was detected just seconds before the collapse of the second (north) tower. These bursts cannot be explained by the plane collisions or the rubble from the towers hitting the ground. Each burst was followed immediately by the collapse of each of the two towers. Pools of molten steel found at the base of each of the collapsed twin towers six weeks after the collapse is evidence of massive underground explosions. That would be the only means to generate enough heat to keep the steel molten for six weeks. It is not clear what type of explosive was used. It could have been a thermite bomb, a micro-nuclear device, or a barometric bomb. The huge explosions may have literally knocked the towers off their foundations, causing them to collapse.


The evidence is starting to trickle out that the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks on September 11, 2001 were inside jobs. Many cannot bring themselves to believe that President George W. Bush is a traitor, who was in on the 9-11 attacks. One should understand he is not the first President to commit treason, and the way things are going he won’t be the last. Sarah McClendon (White House Reporter) in her June 1992 Newsletter quoted George W. Bush’s father, President George H.W. Bush (Skull and Bones member), making the following cryptic statement regarding his own treasonous conduct while he was President: “If the people were to ever find out what we have done, we would be chased down the streets and lynched.” Israel clearly has the most to gain, and the 9-11 disasters have all the earmarks of Zionist agent provocateurs.


If it sounds too unbelievable that elements of the U.S. government would be behind the WTC disaster, consider the 1962 “Operation Northwoods.” In his new exposé of the National Security Agency (NSA) titled Body of Secrets, author James Bamford revealed that in 1962, all of the members of the U.S. Military Joint Chiefs of Staff hatched a secret plan codenamed “Operation Northwoods” The plan called for the U.S. government to conduct terrorist acts against Americans and blame Cuba, to create popular sentiment for an invasion of Cuba.


Bramford was able to obtain a formerly Top Secret memorandum which set forth specific plans for acts of violence by the U.S. government against U.S. citizens that would be blamed on Cuba as “pretexts which would provide justification for US military intervention in Cuba.” “Operation Northwoods included, among other things, plans to shoot down a CIA plane designed to replicate a passenger flight and announce that Cuban forces shot it down, blowing up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blaming Cuba. The plan stated that "casualty lists in the US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation." The plan called for the development of a terror campaign in the Miami and Washington, D.C. areas. If the reader thinks that such a plan is just too preposterous to be true, go to the scanned PDF photocopy of the original “Top Secret” memorandum found at the web link in the endnote at the end of this sentence and read it for yourself. The Jews have an established habit of using agent provocateurs. Col. Jack Mohr explains the methods of the Zionists:

Most American Christians fail to realize that most public disturbances, strikes and political confusion do not just happen out of a clear blue sky. They are planned that way. A few years ago the Jewish community of Skokie, Illinois, was thrown into a total frenzy by a Nazi group who applied for a permit to parade through town. Nothing was ever said on national TV, or in the news, when it was discovered that the "thug" who paraded in Nazi uniform as the leader of the Nazi group was a young Jew from the Jewish Defense League. It has been proven that many incidents described as vicious anti-Semitism, such as desecration of synagogues and Jewish cemeteries, have been committed by Jewish thugs. This is a means they use to keep the little Jew in line with orders from the Kehillah, and to keep the general public softened up over the ugliness being perpetrated against the noble, innocent Jew.


Col. Jack Mohr is an advocate of the Christian Identity movement. That movement teaches that the true tribes of Israel are the Anglo Saxons who settled in the British Isles. As pointed out in the next chapter, that doctrine is simply wrong. According to the Holy Bible, there is no longer a racial distinction between Jew and Gentile in God’s plan for salvation. “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28 AV) The author has included material from Jack Mohr because his summary of the historical facts regarding the Jewish conspiracy are accurate.


Jack Bernstein stated that the 23 October 1983 suicide bombing attack on the U.S. Marine barracks in Lebanon where 241 Marine personnel were killed was planned by the Israeli military intelligence (the Mossad). Bernstein stated that the purpose for the attack on the marine base was to turn the American people against the Arabs in order to draw the United States into the war to help Israel.


That 1983 Marine barracks bombing was not the first time that Israel has used agent provocateurs. In 1954 the U.S. was beginning to favor Egypt over Israel regarding some regional issues. The Israeli government decided to use eleven Israeli agents in Egypt to blow up some American buildings and blame it on Egyptian nationalists. The hopes of the Israelis was to rupture the relationship between Egypt and the United States. The plot, however, was discovered and exposed. It was referred to as the Lavon Affair, after the Defense Minister of Israel, Pinhas Lavon, who was allegedly the mastermind behind the plot. Lavon denied he was involve in the plot and blamed the Israeli military intelligence, the Mossad. It was never completely resolved which of them was responsible. What is clear was that it was an official operation of the Israeli government.


The Israelis learned their lesson from the Lavon affair. They now use unwitting Muslim Arabs to do their dirty work. Some have alleged that the 1993 truck bombing of the World Trade Center was arranged by an operative of the Israeli Mossad. How many other bombings and highjackings have been perpetrated by Muslims who were tools of the Mossad? Could the September 11, 2001 destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) be the work of the Mossad and the CIA, using unwitting Arab terrorists in order to get the U.S. to wipe out the Arab resistance to their Zionist goals? In the shadowy world of terrorism one must ask: cui bono (who benefits)? The Zionists will be the clear winners from the WTC destruction and it fits their modus operandi.

By: Edward Hendrie