The Great Cover up and Total Control

Written in 1982 'The Great Cover up' is a guide to questioning your own make-up and the world you found yourself in. It's the sum total of a lifetime of encyclopedic research into the inner self and the external forces that shape it...

INTRODUCTION

The collapse of civilized existence and the present polarity of state tyranny and personal psychosis have placed the human condition in jeopardy. Political rhetoric about the threat of nuclear war veils from ordinary people that the danger to the species lies not in any future crisis but in the current social nexus where the purpose of existence has been so bound to irrational and magical goals that almost all linguistic analysis may be considered already too late.

It is our contention that the current barbarism, being so complete in its concept and performance, has actually achieved a deep magical and hypnotic power over the human creature who lives within this now almost total systemic patterning. Concepts, however radical, do not impinge on the holistic conditioning, by which the modern human creature is manipulated from birth to death.

Since this cultural imprinting is both deep and social, as opposed to personal—we must look urgently at what may break the spell of the current zombified species before it is too late, which, of course, it could well be.

Part of the current delusive doctrine of society puts forward the picture of 'primitive societies' as being dependent on religion, worship and magic. The inverted commas are theirs, not ours, for part of the deception is that they do not view, primitives as primitive but rather empathetically absorb that original freshness for life into their advanced and 'civilized' patterning, thus removing the risk of a dialectical swing-back.

These religious elements of course have been replaced with rational, developmental, and evolutionary goals whose evidences are the proof of their validity. We will in the course of this short work, if God wills it, examine that mythology in its place. In stating our theme, however, we emerge onto the battleground itself.

We intend to demonstrate here that the current dominant culture is primitive, magical, irrational, anti-populist, and fetishist. The methods and processes of thought and behavior which this society has built to protect itself are certainly effective. A society which has designed revolution as a means of sustaining the status quo, which has constructed a political system which makes absolutist elitism appear as populist choice deserves our admiration if only on a theoretical level.

A society which can allow social and political studies to make a radical critique of mind-control through state agencies as if the issue were within an arena of public social concern and decision, whereas the reality of that society renders that specific choice basically irrelevant since there is a prior deep programme of mind control over the whole society, including those 'aware' citizens who debate the issue of the minority at risk by mind manipulation, as well as the agencies of manipulation and the people in charge of them in turn—that society has evolved an extreme power situation.

The 'conspiracy theory' which is another protective method to deflect criticism from the social structure by means of a logical double bind is not even worth considering. How could one call it a conspiracy if one were to come upon a heroin-addicted community where not only the addict schemed to turn on the non-addict, but the pusher, the supplier, the manufacturer and the farmer were all themselves addicts. How can you call an open norm a conspiracy?

We have right away admitted that these issues to be examined in this work may not be received by the modern literate member of the society. The blocking system has been so effectively worked out, the objectification magic, the distancing, the alienation-effect, all contribute to rendering the human being unable to move into the condition where he or she becomes a transformative element in society and not a passive one. Logically therefore it will be asked what is the point of presenting the field analysis at all?

There is, inevitably one flaw in the magical process, and that flaw is, ironically an essential part of the present total system that controls the dominant culture. Since the current power system has made literacy, criticism, and experiment all elements which it deludes its followers into imagining give it free access to self-expression, it is possible to put forward this critique along with its remedy. Since game has been elevated to a mystical sacrament— 'action-without-social-effect'— it could be that some small group within the programmed society will attempt this strategy as a game, for the society despite its total effectiveness can never assuage the biologically built-in restlessness of the human creature and its inability to be satisfied with the world of forms.

Thus, the society's agreed scheme to offer to the restless human an endless chain of changing and diverting game-forms and role-forms, allows us to 'slip in' to this poor programmed creature the deeply subversive programme of original knowledge, a method which we can date back thousands of years, and which we can both explain and provide in-back data for, showing its continuity and consistency.

Just as the urban guerilla leaves an explosive device in the centre of a public place where it will eventually cause havoc, so we place this work, so inwardly explosive, in the public arena among the other consumer objects, deceptively, without disturbing the horrible calm of the shopping Mall. Yet if this device is activated by a social group then the one element that the current society most dreads and has most superbly prevented from happening—social transformation—must inevitably take place.

This small book is about social magic in the modern state. If you wish a definition it is equivalent to a book of antidotes to known poisons. Only these poisons are not sensory poisons but meaning poisons. It is an anti-talisman against the talismanic magic of the dominant culture, and a talisman of protection which will free the user from the all-effective control of their magic. It is not, as we will demonstrate, a magic pitted against another magic. But rather it is the relentless submission of this fantasy magic to the light of reality.

'And when the truth comes the lie must disappear.'

THE DOMINANT CULTURE DECODED

We intend to present a critical and demythologizing examination of the current society and attempt to expose its underlying systemic method of total control over human beings. It is implicit in this critique therefore that there is another view of the human situation not only possible but traditional and in fact continuous throughout the human cultural situation. It is this ancient and continually valid view that is in this age so endangered, and should it disappear then with it would disappear the possibility and actuality of the human beings fulfilling their highest and unique function. Thus, they would, in losing this, lose the function of humanness itself, and the species would be mutant, altered, and the human project destroyed forever, and this galaxy would be dead, as the termitary is dead with the demise of its highest function, the queen termite.

So we will continually find that the lie of the current culture is face to face with a direct opposite in definition of values from the ancient human view.

Let us begin by saying that it is the central teaching of the current culture which we shall call kafir culture—a definition will follow—that it is the best society that has emerged on the earth so far. It cannot be emphasized enough how important this concept is to all that follows of the kafir view. Many of the worst excesses and crimes of this culture will be perpetrated in the name of this forward thrust of advancement and betterment of the human species.

Against this we can see how the traditional view—'there is no time that will not be worse than the time before it'—is the key to unmasking many of the fantasy projects of the current system.

That the arrogance of an imperial culture is no new thing does not in any way diminish this most irrational and at times staggering phenomenon. Even in the face of the collapse of one of its systems, like industrialized and now computerized medicine, the tone and texture of superiority somehow is never lost.

While the world's poor still count civilization to be the presence of the hospital system in their midst the western industrialist is found to be flying in his private jet to be treated by a traditional Muslim Hakim applying the vastly superior medical system of Ibn Sina (Avicenna)— himself both the father of that medical system and the bastard mutant we call modern medicine.

What is at issue is the patterning and relational meaning of the acquired knowledge in the two systems. Germane to this structural aspect is the deeper underlying issue of roles. It is the magic and ritualized elitism of the doctor and of the engineer and of the politician and so on that must be unmasked if we are to recognize the gross yet effective deceptions of this demented, primitive, aztec society.

It is important too to bear in mind throughout this examination that the current culture not only considers itself superior to all previous cultures, but it is also convinced that it is intellectually advanced. That is, it claims that the logical function when applied to engineering and technical projects is superior to all other human activities. It conceives that its humanist values—rational, at base—break through the clouded emotionalism of the previous inquisitorial, genocidal, and fanatical eras whose record we know.

There is, mutatis mutandis, a warm, almost sentimental experience of human worth having won through primitive rites and practices to a compassionate and concerned society. Now, at last you are taken care of, you need fear nothing. The doctors will deliver you from the admirable safety of the womb as gently as possible. The cord will reluctantly be cut. You will be raised in a soft environment of inflatables and miniaturized furniture lest the bigness of things intimidate the emergent organism. Like the Buddha you will be kept away from the unsightly experience of physical decay and bodily disintegration: death will be a stranger to you, as will extreme old age. A guarded tranquillized atmosphere will be assured you. Soothing music will ooze out of the walls of the shopping mall where you will exercise your freedom in the open choice of consumer objects made to your demand according to your own free taste. The market will obediently follow your desires. You will exercise your healthy body along with the group in exultant running which will utterly exhaust your restless inward drives. Should there be any spill over from your morning run you will dress as you have chosen that season and will attend one of the great arenas of culture to listen to the turbulent and uncensored surge of a great orchestra which will allow you to sit back in your polyester seat and inwardly soar with yearning in transcendent bliss. The music will pin down for you that elusive sense of flight which troubled you so much. Should you still be unable to sleep—the slight edge of distress at the death of a loved one—the doctor will be always at hand to soothe you and offer you the necessary medication. In extreme trouble he will conduct you to a group session where similar disturbed citizens may, in a serene setting by the ocean, scream out their panic, and writhe in their child-like fear—the result will be a meaningful exhaustion. Afterward you will sense a certain daring, a certain maturity at having risked these turbulent seas. You will return to continue enacting the great social celebration of the spectacle that is the plaza of the new society. Life is entering a vast concrete arena, sensing its space and power, your centrality to it. The anthem plays. 'This is what it is all about, isn't it? Isn't it? . . .'

'Have they not traveled in the land to see the consequence for those before them? They were more numerous than these, and mightier in power and traces on the earth. But all that they used to earn availed them not.'

Let us now look one by one at the key cluster of basic myths which underpins this kafir society.

1. Progress.

Perhaps this myth more than any other demonstrates the irrational structure that holds together this so fragile society—for its strength is only apparent. There has never been a more vulnerable community than the current civilization. The first thing to be noted about the progress concept is almost outrageous, when considered coolly, for we find that the ruling elite are themselves the most cynical in deriding the concept, yet at the same time it is this concept that they propagate in all their justification for continued research and in the—quite different—level of works they make available to the so-called educated masses. In other words the view of the specialized academic is found to be in direct contradiction to the view of the popular modern home encyclopedia and the school class-room.

No one really believes, for example, that absurd, speeded-up portrayal of the evolutionary chain which shows the ape slinking along on all fours, and slowly rising to its feet to become ancient Paleolithic man through his various simian phases, his skull confidently mutating forward in chromosomic leaps that we are assured were most gradual and rational and necessary, until the creature with a few more radical organic re-alignments, like acquiring a jointed thumb, can at last be recognized as our old friend upright modern homo sapiens, thinking man. Or do they?

No one really believes that this emergent ape moved swiftly over these millennia from mating and territorial-dispute grunts to tribes of early man each with his own highly defined and specific language system of grammatical and structural (meaning) complexity, of such sophistication that we are able to confirm that the role of language far from evolving is one of devolution and that in the first phases of language are found its most profound and variegated aspects. Or do they?

What must be understood is that the dominant elite of the current culture have put forward a fiction, a fantasy riddled with inconsistencies which they call evolution and that system goes basically unchallenged except by cranks and religious fanatics who deny the advances of modern science. Two minutes shocked silence in the face of this monstrous irrational attitude usually follows, and people bow their heads grateful for their deep rational—credulity.

We will later observe the means by which this open fantasy system goes unchallenged. Now what we are lining up is a recognition that the idea of progress, on which the political and therefore the economic and therefore the cultural goals of the society are based, rests on this unchallenged but untenable deception called evolution.

In short the myth of biological evolution is the foundation for the myth of social evolution. The whole history of man is aligned to point to the current emergence of modern man from millennia of darkness. The past of man itself has been reduced to spectacle. The previous great ages of man are now encapsulated in displays in museums.

Primitive cultures are captured in an instant of 'living history' in anthropological museums. There is their tent, real hand-woven goat's hair. There is their hand beaten brass coffee roasting and cooking service. There is a wax Bedouin in a replica robe. There is his stuffed camel. We observe them. We examine them. We learn from them. Thus we are the superior culture. Ah, but we do empathize. Our humanity is vast. We recognize their art, their music, their simple faith. We realize that the nomadic desert life has poetic, indeed, dangerous appeal—still that irritating irrational streak of waywardness not yet fully eliminated. But our warm humanist ethic absorbs the nomad into our poetic imagination. After all, the free desert life is all very well but—what if you needed an appendectomy? How would your wife like to deliver her baby without the reassuring doctor and his surgical knife and his anesthetics in case of any sign of pain or trouble? What if you wanted to read a paperback? And you shudder at the raw isolation of it all and the naked fear of existence, life and death that for a moment have been thrillingly exposed to you in the cool air-conditioned splendor of the life-arena of the Museum of Man. The haunting flute of the Bedouin will not long disturb your dreams.

So the education teaches progress, and underlines it with archaeological and anthropological data laid out as a proof. The proof demonstrates, in this myth, that the current project is not only the best possible one, but is better than all previous models. Indeed, is this not the central mythic law of the kafir society, that the scientific model, so reassuringly logical (has it yet got you to equate logical with rational?) is only there while it functions and never claims anything primitive like absolute reality, and so when a better, newer model comes along, we are happy to abandon it and embrace with fervor the new and therefore better and therefore in some thrilling way more logical (rational?) and thus more efficacious model. This is progress.

Do not question industrialization, it is a better model. Look at the achievements? What—? Child workers, pregnant women hauling the coal carts? Let us work it out. There! We have just had the industrial revolution! Is that not better? Is that not more rational? We have made trade unions. This will protect the worker. We have universal franchise. Thus social choices are in fact your choices. If you do not like the choices blame the government. It is yours. You can change it. What? Global wars? Wars using the products of the factories. That is a planning issue we did not foresee. Let us make a League of Nations. That can be their job. Is that not better? Is that not a new era? No more wars. It did not work. Ah, then we will make a better model. There! The United Nations. The World Health Organization. How about that! What? Electronics is putting the noble industrial worker out of work? The unions are going to stop the redundancy of the worker? But look—electronics is an advance. It must be accommodated. What? Oil is running out? Solar energy—it will not run out. Are you not inspired? Ecologism in place of ruthless industrial exploitation. Is that not better? What? Electronics leads to a police state. Control? No freedom? Whatever the social nexus produces is better when it emerges. The faults we will iron out. We will move forward. But to where is the society moving? What is it for, what is the goal of this demented commitment to outward change? What IS better?

The arena in which the slaves disport themselves.

2. Development.

So, connected to progress, comes the social imperative of development. We could call development the outward evidence of progress. The highways, the hospitals, the great edifices of the new society are the proofs of its meaningfulness. It is its own proof. In downtown cities the great buildings are always that of the religion of the culture. That religion has to be laid bare piece by piece. But the temples of a society are always its dominant buildings and what dominates a western city is its bank and its insurance building and what dominates an eastern city is its state equivalent. It must never be forgotten that this culture is one and not two. The Peking Academy basically teaches the same view of progress and evolution as does Stanford.

The first thing the new President of any emergent' country does is order huge quantities of concrete. It is the raw material of development. Development comes in schemes. They are ritualized and frenzied closed-experiments in non-meaningful activities which involve the whole population. From the President to the worker-slave. Everyone benefits! The road is laid to the door of the factory. The factory has another road running to the mine. Raw materials are dredged from the earth. Products are made. With this surge of inexplicable activity which rips up the earth and fills the air with poisonous fumes comes a series of predictable needs. Housing for the workers. Housing for the technocrats. Housing for the managerial class. This means plumbing. This means lighting. This means infrastructure. This means crime. This means an efficient police force. This means a hospital. This means a school. This means a market place to allow the workers and the elite to spend their newly won tokens in the chains of stores in the great hangar that has sprung up alongside the housing. This is development! This is new life for the society. Do not argue! Do not question! This is the long-awaited development.

It will slowly be recognized, and not immediately, that the question: 'What is it all for?'—is not the relevant question at all. It is a dangerously diversionary question. For by asking it you take your place precisely where the critic of the society is meant to land—as opposing progress, as being a rousseau-ite, a romantic, a man who wants to turn the clock back. Clearly irrational. Clearly to be avoided. A Luddite. Step by step it can be grasped, however, that the question is already answered in the question. Of course. The goal of development is development. No, not the next development. Development is its own goal. We are confronting a goalless society. A society without direction because it is not going anywhere. It is not in progress or regress. It is in a remarkable terrifying stasis, like a mouse which chases its own tail in terror, turning on itself.

3. Evolution.

It is now we may look again at evolution in the light of the myth of development. We are now able to see how in the shop window the theory of evolution is able to distract people from the current stasis of the society by offering to them in their imaginations and only in their imaginations the narrative of a global impulse to change that has never stopped, and presumably will never stop. Thus all that is happening can be projected as part of the onward relentless hurtling energy of cosmic 'progress'—galactic development. It can only be in an evolutionary society that its activities are themselves evolving. That is the theory.

In other words the theory of evolution in itself, while absurd and untenable, as myth, as in-back theory is ideal to convince the people that they are participants in the forward (not backward) movement of history—and that movement, is the current project. Yet we can now see that there is no movement except the desperate and demented revolution around the instant, in the most frenzied attempt to stop the very process that can so terrifyingly be ^{recognised underneath the cultural event—life itself.}

The biological theory of evolution is as essential to the political realities of the kafir culture as it is an embarrassment to the research scientist whose own intriguing findings make nonsense of its unrealistic contours. At a convention of evolutionists gathered from all over Europe and America that was held at Boulder University we asked one professor if he encountered any serious students who questioned the underlying principles of evolution—leaving out the religious lunatic fringe—his reply was anthropologically significant, he said: 'If I did I'd smash their heads in!'

The theory of evolution like all other scientific underpinnings of the consumer society remains intact as dogma, by the use of a protection system that we may designate as the stepping-stone system. It works both ways, across the river and back. Through the range of the dissemination of the theory, and in specific instances, from phase to phase of the argument.

For example, if you question a standard text-book put out in the mass education system it will be pointed out that that is unfortunately a dangerous over-simplification and certainly distorts the mainline concepts as currently taught in he higher levels at the university.

If you were then to turn your attention to the standard university textbooks presenting the mainline thesis you would be told in turn that at the research level all that knowledge was now superseded and the whole 'problem' had been restated in new terms.

Thus you would never come to grips with the authenticity of the theory at any level and it would simply remain as an intellectual and therefore social reality after you finally left it alone to flourish.

Within the argument, the jump from stone to stone is no less obvious and effective. Take any evolutionist text of whatever minor sect and examine it. You will be told that species 'x' in the face of environmental change was forced to mutate, and by gradual and subtle change in its secondary characteristics altered to suit the new environment, washables survive, while the other species which did not adapt were destroyed. The change was made Dy Natural Selection.

Once it is recognized that the non-existent conceptual non-spatial zone mat is Natural Selection can be granted no Ontological significance it loses its capital letters and slinks away. In the next step you are submitted close specific molecular or structural diagrams indicating the nature of the change itself. How the process functions, at what stage consciousness is involved if at all, is never said. The evolutionary event is reified as chromosomic, and when the design aspect is confronted then the elusive and metaphysical concept of Natural Selection, with or without capitals, takes its place.

Here from a university-level text on 'biological engineering' are some crude but typical examples of this deceptive language . . . 'the problem is, Nature cannot use materials.' So Nature has both identity and limitations. 'It is an idea Nature has used for thousands of years.' Thus Nature has also endured over this vast period.

It is implied that Nature has personality for It is clearly grappling with concepts. 'What Natural Selection has done is divide up the brittle material into sections.' Here Natural Selection is definitely a transcendent or immanent-and-transcendent working force operating according to rational and systemic plans. The patterns of Nature are not produced at random—every force is a 'reply' to a force outside—' So Nature and Natural Selection are either two gods or one is working for the other. There is a force outside Nature. So what is that? What can be called 'outsideness'? Where are its limits? What defines the within-ness of the being 'Nature'? 'Once all the structural problems are solved.'

The implication being, that structure is separate from performance, that the organism is separate from and other than its environmental field. These are two non-related realities. If Natural Selection designed the organism did Nature design the environment? And then do they sometimes fight? If there is a 'design problem' is this due to some incapacity in Natural Selection or Nature? What constitutes a biological problem?

Clearly evolution is supposed to provide the biological solution! Certainly it seems from their statements that if nature solves problems then the 'problem' is outside the knowledge of Nature, therefore outside Nature itself. The whole matter is saturated with methodological contradiction and deception.

Unfortunately things do not get better the higher one goes among the biologists, rather, the metaphysical disorder, the crudely obvious lack of a sound basis in phenomenology is most clear where the overview is presented.

At the very core of much recent biological deception has been the language of chance in trying to provide an alibi for a theory that is bent on denying what lies in front of it—a complete Universe, perfect in every way with nothing lacking. Nothing, that is except in the defective eye of the observer who looks and does not see because he fails to understand that far from being the observer, in truth, he is the observed.

Everything is due to a chance mutation. To a chance encounter at the billionth degree of improbability this primal substance fuses with that and the whole unintended event of cosmic life has started. But what a sophisticated and intentional concept. Chance is itself a determined response to necessary existence.

The most popular of all scientific images is the role of the dice, or the turn of the roulette wheel. But surely the arrival at zero on the roulette wheel is the most clear demonstration possible of determinism. The wheel has such and such a circumference. The groove is of such and such dimensions. The ball has this gravity-pull and this weight. The wheel revolves at this speed and decelerates in this ratio from the force of the initial pull of this strength. The limited numbers are laid out in this pattern. The arc of the ball's slowing down measured against the arc of the wheel's slowing down must inevitably bring about its arrival at point zero, given its moment of impact with the wheel and all those other factors coming together.

Chance is only a structured event, utterly determined, viewed from a point that fails to grasp all the ponderables that make up the doomed moment when the ball comes to rest in zero. Our inability to grasp the cosmic givens, those tremendous necessary actualities and events on which existence is founded should not drive us to the primitive panic of the magical concept of chance and random event.

'... nor is there any god along with Him, else would each god have assuredly championed that which he created. And some of them would assuredly have overcome others. Glorified be Allah above all that they allege.'

4. Education.

We should now look at the arena in which the educational process takes place which produces these programmed and literate hooligans who then proceed to lay waste to the world so effectively in such a deep state of existential unrest, The groves of academe are, as their name implies, traditionally based on the Greek civilization from which the rhetoric of the culture pretends to derive its inspiration.

This Palladian style is eerily found from Peking's Stalinist temples to Stanford's greco-roman garage architecture. It is vital to understanding this analysis that you realise that the world of learning is not varied but utterly unified as one Masonic group, worldwide. Thus in their international directory, The World of Learning', you can find Moscow, Peking and New York all peacefully coexisting. Their views, their staffs almost openly interchangeable, without posing any threat to the statist religion of the kafir world.

The campus is the most carefully structured free-space in the society. It is a completely monitored environment. Its actions, rituals, possibilities are more carefully programmed than any other section of the society. Since youth is volatile, and by its nature dangerous, for it demonstrates its movement from youth into maturity in a way which goes against the whole 'fixed' nature of the dominant group. Its youthfulness is not shocking—what is risky is its transformative energy. They come in young, they go out mature. It is important that they go out having agreed to keep the deception going.

They have successfully made the transference from taught to teacher, from ruled to rulers, from youth in flux to non-death life that precedes the unmentionable geriatric disaster to come. If you are very lucky you may achieve the one way out of old age—fame, which confers on you the status of Grand Old Man or Woman who may be paraded respectfully to the end, provided, that is, the cortex does not let you down.

The control of the campus is not necessarily to be thought of as the practice of rigid repression— that tends to be more an 'underdeveloped' country phenomenon. The control can be recognized as creating an arena of staged social debate, planned anarchy, a coherent vocabulary of social change without access to the social reality, musically scored outbursts of revolutionary activity, even carefully cast martyrdoms, so that student life may stand, both in experience and retrospect, for a romantic picture of the fun, glory and MISTAKEN nature of youthful energy. (Kent State).

The university is both the first social experience outside the family and the ultimate sealing of the family pattern as being the inescapable pattern of life. Apparently opening the student to an away-from-home environment it provides exactly a projected large scale family-values/family-identity situation. The deep sentimental attachment to college is matched by the parental role that the professors play in molding the student.

The place itself is a home in apotheosis. It is based on parental approval and paves the way for state approval that is the great and ultimate follow up and completion of the kafir slave's education. Also, in some countries it is paid for by the parents as some kind of ultimate sacrificial gift from parent to child, and in others the surrogate state-parent makes the generous gift—it may even be seen to emerge symbolically as the act of the state leader in his all-embracing compassionate concern for the youth of the country.

By extension we notice that the authority structure which IS the University, is architecturally the same as that of the Church, traditionally, (Gothic, etc.) which in turn is that of the State Capitol and even the prisons.

In England the traditional pattern is Gothic, in Masonic countries it is Palladian. Now with the open transfer of religious power from Church to Bank the architecture of the university tends to be modeled on that of the Bank. While the Bank once modestly operated under the Church, it has now openly replaced it as a place of worship and thus it has managed to break away and establish its own architectural modes. So the new university, state centre, and following lamely along, the church, is based on the architecture of the modern Bank.

Within these structures, themselves indicators of their value and meaning, we discover the content of what is taught to be the underlying myth of the society.

Here you are taught that the world is a) your playground, and b) your classroom. Everything is a fit subject for study. Except the present. It is not on any account to be subjected to study. The present is for play. You do not ask, 'What is the university for?' Again that allows you to be distracted into a dialectic which casts you in the revolutionary and thus useful role of keeping it all going. The reply, 'What indeed?' would suffice to avoid any deep analysis from revealing the real situation. The question does not have an answer. Or again, we find that it is a closed system in which the answer is the question. The point of study is study itself. You learn in order to teach.

Now this has a deep and useful meaning but that is not what is meant in the university. What is at issue is never the knowledge but the role-playing which the so-called knowledge exchange permits. Your classes in medieval history, or the history of the class struggle, or in research, are not of any other use but that you in turn should transmit this secret hierophantic knowledge to another group waiting their turn.

In one of the major textbooks on anthropology used in the American college system it openly declares in the preface that it is quite clear that almost none of the people who major in anthropology will use it in the sense that they will ever BE an anthropologist. This is beside the point, the preface notes. What matters is that by studying this science each and every student will be able to see the whole society from an anthropological point of view! In other words this science will serve as a means to total indoctrination of the whole-culture control of the learning subject. It is the student's complete guarantee to being accessible throughout life to the mind-control of the culture in its all-embracing functional splendour in every sphere of existence.

And it must be noted, this goes equally well for the student of politics, or of ecology or of psychology. It is true of each and every one of the sciences, for they interfold the subject in an acceptance that is both dazzling, effective, and complete.

THE CONTROL SYSTEM

The control system that enslaves 'modern' man is not complex although it seems impossible to dismantle. Its best metaphor is the knitted garment—its outward patterning on the fabric does not reveal its structural patterning, for its design lies across the basic 'weave'. Equally, if it is severed at any part the pull of the rest of the garment will hold it all together until it is mended.

It is, in other words, a system of interlink with an overlay of deceptive design which is in itself irrelevant to its structure. Politics is the aesthetic design, the monetary system (not 'economics') holds the whole together.

Pull that and you will unravel the garment from top to bottom.

Let us look for a moment at the political myth system. It is structuralist. Its ideology is structuralism and neither communism nor capitalism, which are in themselves merely tactical means to the acquiring of wealth and power.

The Christian ethos was long ago overthrown by the subversive revenge of the exiled, 'homeless' Russian khazar tribes who had converted to Judaism both to be free of attack from Christian and Muslim armies and in response to the mythology of alienation that surrounded the tribes of Israel historically.

To be ideological Jews who were not themselves Semites, and thus the 'chosen people', was a wonderful fulfillment of the disenfranchised and alienated condition of the khazar tribes. Driven across Russia by persecution and then across eastern Europe they forged an arcane and romantic ideology of 'return' to a homeland whose mythic name was 'Jerusalem' —its resonance was to stretch across centuries through both political and Masonic propaganda, reaching the mad Blake with his vision of building "'Jerusalem' in England's green and pleasant land."

Without a means of protection or capacity to initiate attack these remarkable people forged political instruments of destabilization and conceived the wonderfully clever idea of 'let the enemy destroy itself, since we are powerless'.

Thus both disinformation and destabilization were the active means of destroying the Christian/Islamic ethos which still dominated them.

Two political goals were lined up. One, the destruction of 'Christendom' through the technique of revolution. This was aimed at the removal of all kings and bishops from power in Europe. Two, the dismantling of the Islamic khalifate in Istanbul. Basically, by 1924 both goals had been achieved.

By 1917 the home-base monarchy of Russia was eliminated and thus by extension the whole monarchy system for it was run by interlink itself with two great families holding the whole thing together as its warp and woof.

By 1923 the keys of the khalifate had been formally surrendered to two Jewish agents working for the Masonic 'Young Turk' grouping.

The whole epoch seethed with secret Masonic societies and intrigues and plots and counter-plots. The ideology of rule by the house of Zion had proved triumphant. Just as, in their mythic view of politics, they had freed themselves from Pharaoh so they had from their enemies—and stolen HIS secret of power—that is to say—the pyramid.

Today, the rabbi's son, Lenin, lies entombed in his pyramid and symbolically controls the power system of the soviet-block. Look at the global effects of the mythology of masonism—that is, the system used to subvert others to this fantasy cause—it is astonishing. Lincoln is honoured by a statue where he is seated on a Throne of David' (all its measurements are manically precise—as is the layout of Washington D.C. itself!) but more astonishing we find Mao Tse Tung enthroned on an identical throne in Peking, China!

Sphinxism on a global scale is surely an odd phenomenon. But not more odd than the complete uniformity of University structures right across the world, both east and west according to the original masonic models of the eighteenth century.

It is not conspiracy or racism that is being examined here. Clearly the basis of Zionism is not racial since its blonde blue eyed Russian exponents themselves would be the first to be horrified at the concept of having 'Semitic' blood. Nor are we interested in nostalgic monarchism which blames the Jews for all the world's woes. We are noting their contribution to the imaginative and ideological fabric of the modern mythic dilemma.

It is not fantasy or arcane right-wing theory that notes that a tiny nation of a couple of million people is a nuclear power and has an as yet not understood relationship with 'racist' south Africa and as yet not unmasked control over the U.S.A. giving it the power to plunge the whole world into global war. What other country of comparable size, e.g. Mauritania, can boast an intelligence service that even has operatives working in small countries in South America and East Asia?

There are many other elements at work in modern society but what is happening cannot be understood unless the mythic and ideological element of Zionism is understood—but it cannot be understood as a system which has specific goals of a political nature for 'Jewish' people.

All its overt claims are nonsense, otherwise Israel would be a non-racist nation and world 'Jews' would not want to be anywhere else. Its nationalist aspirations are a DIVERSION from its true and natural activity. The activity involves more non-Jews (note the incipient racism of Zionism, as in blacks being called non-whites) than Jews.

The key element in Zionism is its structuralism, based on its ideological myth pattern—the ancient story of the 'Jews' and Pharaoh. The significant element in Zionism is its turning about of the ancient story. Instead of confirming the prophetic (Musan) rejection of Pharaoh's power, it posits a stealing and an acquiring of his power by discovering the 'secret of the pyramids'. We do not refer to idiotic western Egyptology—but to the basic structuralist technique which is nothing less than the foundation of modern western science, whose outcome is the Jewish, not the Islamic bomb, conceived as its was by Einstein (now also deified in the U.S.A.) designed by Oppenheimer and administrated by Lilienthal! and dropped, we should add, by the Christians!

The structuralist principle was applied throughout the fabric of the society. At the political level, the level of 'scientific discourse', the cultural level. The study of man himself was made a matter for interlock structuralist myths and metaphors. Thus the view of man that came to dominate the (world-based) university system was authored by Levi-Strauss, the 'father' of modern anthropology. Language was forced with much difficulty to submit to the structuralist discipline, and linguistics was born, fathered by Noam Chomsky. Man's inner and self experience too had to be colonized. This was done by the Viennese (novelist?) doctor, Sigmund Freud. When he arrived in the U.S.A. he turned to his colleague and said, 'Little do they realize, we are bringing them the plague!' A cynical pun on the oedipal crime, and an interesting echo of Churchill's metaphor when he referred to Lenin being brought to the Finland station from Switzerland in his sealed train, 'like a plague bacillus.'

The structuralist technique is itself utterly logical and pyramidic and elitist. Yet its means to accession of power, is inevitably, dialectic-ally its opposite—chaos. That is—psychoanalysis, the control mechanism, is in the hands of the elite. For the masses the effect is the unleashing of repression and thus the breaking of the norms of taboo restraints and natural moral behavior.

Thus, the lie of scientific discourse. Psycho-analysis must never 'meet' anthropology for they contradict each other. Evolution must never 'meet' linguistics since language does not conform to its thesis—and so on.

Thus the current dynamic of society is a continual Russian roulette. The build-up of structuralist power is dependent on the cyclical unleashing of inchoate social energy. At every gamble the chaotic power could destroy the structure. Each convulsion towards 'freedom' and the liberation of, first the peasants, then the workers, then the colonized, then women, then sexual deviants, then children, has meant the possibility that the next and greater power pyramid will not make it. Yet in each case success is assured by virtue of the cover of politics.

The Current System is a Kafir System

Kufr is covering and the continuation of this society is based on a series of coverings which all work together to condition people into accepting pseudo-change for its own sake.

What is the cover of politics? The political arena is brilliant, effective and from the point of view of the power nexus totally irrelevant. Or rather its relevance is merely emblematic.

The Blue Option

His Holiness the Pope arrives in Istanbul in his motorcade, waving to indifferent and curious Muslims who regard him as he sweeps by wondering what the ermine-clad figure has to do with their life of leaden-grey thirties-cut 'modernized' suits, no winter heating, no sewage, no human habitation fit for their children to be born into—no nutrition in their diets. Under cover of television appearances, diplomatic receptions, and 'mass', the dubious rite by which biscuits turn into flesh and wine into blood — cannibalistic and pointless — behind all this the real work of the visit continues. Sleek black Mercedes glide out of the American embassy and less elegant limousines emerge from NATO headquarters. Under papal cover the meeting is convened, and its decision taken, co-coordinating Washington with Asia.

Some days later, the tanks roll heavily into position in the dawn mist observed by some faithful on their way to the mosques. Armored vehicles glide towards politicians' residences to make their arrests. The coup d'etat has taken place. The Islamic movement is cut down yet again. The masons have restored another pyramidic oppression.

In Washington at the State Department a high ranking official reaches for his bookshelf.

He takes down a white bound book entitled 'Turkey—Area Handbook'.

It has 370 pages. Five chapters.

1. Historical setting

2. The society and its environment

3. The economy

4. Government and politics

5. National Security.

Followed by Appendix, Bibliography, Glossary, Index and List of figures.

He calls in five staff members. Each is told to do a three-page breakdown of one chapter by eleven that morning. At eleven the document is ready. It goes to the Security Adviser. On his desk lie three files.

One blue. One red. One white.

In each is placed a fifteen page breakdown of the book which is the official assessment in structuralist terms of the elements that are fixed and the stress-points and fluidity points in the Turkish society.

One option indicates a denunciation of the coup with regret plus appreciation.

Another indicates open support plus massive upfront investment.

A third indicates approach through NATO and European structures to wean the generals back to 'democracy'.

The Security Adviser carefully places the support and investment in the red file. He walks to the oval office. At eleven ten the three files lie on the President's desk.

At eleven thirty the President selects the red option file and places it before his Secretary of State. NATO are informed. The Istanbul embassy is given the go-ahead. A working lunch is set up with a Banking corporation and two corporations who might invest plus a representative from the World Bank. Before they can move, a loan must put the country further in debt and devaluation of the Turkish lira must take place to assure the total helplessness of the country.

And in all this—all the President has done is peruse a fifteen page document followed by a one page option outline. His advisers have placed the relevant policy in the relevant file-colour.

Blue option will never take place. Unless by an irrational and rebellious personal whim—and then the system would for a moment shudder and instantly readjust if necessary by removal from office, impeachment or assassination.

This is the cover of politics. The people, even the so-called intellectuals will 'debate' whether the President has 'got' a foreign policy, an economic policy and so on. Yet so irrelevant is he to the running of the society that when he is assassinated or politically disgraced his removal scarcely makes a tremor in the continuity of the nation's affairs, let alone the stock market.

All that can be noted is the psychological shock—the 'trauma' which is used in fact to strengthen the control system over the people.

So we have democracy, political democracy which almost in every instance puts in power a man 'elected' by a minority vote. His selection is in turn arranged, like the blue option that never can be adopted—he is the red option. The blue option candidate never gets on the ballot paper. The choice is as fictional as the candidate is meaningful. The statism, pyramidic in the east, is also pyramidic in the west.

In both right and left we have pyramidic statism. Only in the west we have the added mythic 'democracy' and freedom of choice which suggests to the people that they choose their leaders.

In the eastern system pyramidism pretends to work by a series of interlocking committees which appoint upwards to the Leader himself. In their flow charts power is shown to flow from the masses to the leader in diminishing social units which culminate in some form of Presidium which in turn 'elects' its Leader.

The flow-arrows of power delegation are of course mythic. The system is geometric and thus rigid, not biological and thus supple. Power lies on the top. But, and this is important the power nexus is not EXPOSED. It is not political. The politicians are the butlers. They serve their masters, and they rule below stairs over the masses—the servants.

The myth of politics prevents the intellectuals and the high-drive elements in the society (media, academics) from recognizing the true power transaction. It is astonishing to note quite how successful this ruse is. It is still possible after a criminal, a peanut farmer and a cowboy actor have held the post of President of the United States to hear intelligent men discuss the capacity of the President to 'govern'. The fantasy of executive power is effective precisely because of its visibility and geometric domination — for the President marks the cap-stone of the pyramidic structure.

In the first half of this last century power was defined as political and crises within the frame-work of the dominant culture expressed themselves in a political dialectic—fascism versus communism. Then after Euro-war two it was defined as economic.

Within the last twenty-five years the masses have been given crash courses in economic theory. Monetarism, investment, profit margins, the whole mythic vocabulary of economic theory has replaced the equally illusory vocabulary of political struggle.

You could say that when western man was an economic slave he was allowed to talk politics, but now that he is a political slave he is allowed to talk economics. The economic debate does not at any significant point impinge on the power transactions which activate and effect social change.

Since the kafir system is a system which operates under cover, it follows that what is openly available to the masses to be discussed and debated is not relevant to the true control of social processes. Its metaphor is that the masses have been taught to analyze the society as if they were watching a complex chess game on a glass board while on a lower board underneath the true game is being played and it is checkers, with different pieces, different rules and goal—played out on an identical board. While the people argue and agonize over the chess moves, the real game goes on unhindered below.

We have said that the system is one of interlink so that the whole fabric can support the tear wherever it may occur. Thus the question that remains to be asked is, 'by what thread can the whole fabric be unraveled?' If the matter were purely structuralist there would be a political answer. But it cannot be that the social nexus is set up on a simple structuralist thesis.

For the dominant culture to get away with imposing such a horrible and anti-human situation there has to be some in-deep conditioning which renders man impassive to this degradation.

Therefore, while we may note the necessary thread to pull—which will tear apart the fabric of the corrupt super-state of modern culture, we must be aware of the means by which people are controlled in order to replace them with something better.

Now we may examine, first what the underlying structural element of the current culture is and then after that examine how such a flimsy and yet effective deception works, that is to say, what makes the masses willing slaves of a social programme which can only degrade them while promising future liberation?

While there is clearly and absolutely no sense in which the ills of society can be laid at the door of any race or specific grouping in society this does not force us from fear of being labelled racist in what is clearly propagandist defence of the power group from indicating the key role played by Zionism and indeed Jewish. Emphasizing again that it seems historically unprovable that the modern Jews are any longer dominantly a Semitic grouping and indeed may well be a turkic nation from the ancient Khazar kingdom of southern Russia— there is nonetheless a militant and continuing activity which uses a Jewish mythology and a Zionist ideology to activate certain market forces and to impinge on the political destiny of millions.

Political techniques of destabilization, rewriting of history, control of world media, global intelligence activities, global piratism, all these add up to a serious social challenge when backed by groupings outside in industry and banking who are coerced by the ideology or are attracted to it in the first place.

Underwriting the purchase of the Suez canal and underwriting the invasion of Egypt by Israel are two highly political acts aimed at the same heartland of Islam within a hundred years of each other—and by the same family of bankers, the Rothschilds, open adherents of Zionist policy.

But Zionism does not and could not function alone. Without a linkage to the 'Christian' culture of Europe it would have remained hybrid and alien. The linkage of masons gives the Zionist expansionism its means to power. Maoism's half-crazy ideology of elitism coupled with its cynical mockery of Christianity and Islam (but not, notice, Judaism) appeals to the arriviste element in the commercial and political world.

What can be perceived in so-called geopolitics is a series of power interests that intermesh in such a manner that there can never be perceived a commonality of interests, so that tensions and contradictions abound while the common goals of greed and power unify. Zionism is its ideology, masonism its passport to the rest of the world, elitism its principle and the monetary system its magical means of world control.

The power elite effectively control and operate at many levels, military confederations, (NATO, etc): transnational corporations (ITT the well known one, but it is far from alone): banking networks (Citicorp's with its famous Kissinger/Rockefeller axis): energy systems (Gulf and Western going nuclear): as well as the enlisting and securing of politicians by temporary membership to club status and thus access to the world leaders (Trilateral etc.)—thus while there is interlink there is never cohesion.

While there are common goals there is never policy agreement. There is no conspiracy—but it would take only a fool or someone completely brainwashed by the facile rhetoric of liberal and western 'freedom' to buy the myth of political governance by democratic structures, structures which can now be scientifically shown to be subservient to prediction and computerized manipulation. People vote for the last option, prechosen for them, just like their president or prime minister's 'free' choice of the red option.

That Zionism is the underlying ideology of the current dominant culture must not be forgotten, nor the economic force that supports it. Banking is effectively dominated by a triad of forces, one of which is Jewish (Rothschilds, Khun Loeb, Morgan, etc.).

The gold market is dominated and price controlled by them (its world price is still fixed daily, from the Rothschild Bank in London).

The diamond market, world-wide, is theirs, run by another triad structure, New York, Amsterdam and South Africa. Zionism gives the lie to any political reality like the 'national entity' as either having ideological (patriotic) reality or political individuality. Its presence in South America is, from a political and nationalist viewpoint as bizarre as its control of the South African politique.

The Peruvian Jews who meet every week in their clubs to sing Nazi songs with ex-Nazi financiers, as reported by the famous anthropologist, Lewis, is one of the more unsavory but exemplary proofs that Zionism while itself a racism has no real regard for what might have been a Semitic Jewish entity, had it existed.

Jewish—in the Zionist sense of a racial group—hatred of fascism is contradicted by Israeli racism against the Semitic Arabs, as well as for their support of the fascism of the South American regimes and their brutal repression of the Indians in Peru and the stranglehold they wield on the Argentinian economy.

One last element in the ideology is the use of so-called international institutions (already outmoded by the 'other level' system of relationships set up by Zionism) to control world affairs. ('Internationalism is our art': Herzel).

The U.N.O. was brought into being and set up in New York, without prior consultation, in order to bring into being the Zionist banking entity designed to destroy the heartland of the Islamic nation in the middle east. Once 'legal' by a tiny majority with an openly bought couple of votes, the Organization was then basically irrelevant since it would endanger the Zionist programme by voting against its illegal expansion.

Thus, today, Israel stands as an outlaw state, ignoring resolution after resolution contrary to its agreed acceptance of U.N.O. authority.

Similarly, O.A.U. was set up to maintain the colonialist control over Africa and keep at bay any real sanction on south Africa while indulging in ineffective rhetoric.

Now this system of enormous pyramid complexity, elitist in its outcome yet controlling the totality of modern society through its statism (authored by Lenin, yet as much evident in Europe as Russia) and its monetary system and its institutions and organizations, by, in short, the systems method of structuralism, effectively if precariously dominates the world today.

Even china with its ancient humanist heritage has surrendered its Confucian/Taoist dialectic for the pseudo-dialectic of marxist-leninism. Astonishing, yet true.

But what is more astonishing than the financing of Hitler by the Jewish Wall Street financiers of the thirties? ('Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler': Sutton).

The Myth of Money

Everyone knows it—no one follows out its implications. The money in your pocket is worthless. The monetary system is itself mythic. The Emperor's Clothes—everyone recognizes the fact—no one dares say it.

Well, not altogether true!

It has, historically happened already. Significantly, symbolically, and yet actually in history it has happened. When the first Jewish Secretary of State, Kissinger, authored the U.S. bombing of Cambodia, he destroyed the whole inner order of the state. In the resulting turmoil the Khmer Rouge battalions effectively took control of the country. The Pol Pot regime's actions have never been examined politically. Partly because of the bloody and ruthless nature of their activity — which makes hot media fodder, and partly because it was clearly not in the interests of the Zionist nexus to let out the news.

Within a relentless yet systematic revision of the society, from the base up according to strict ideological principles, Pol Pot set about creating the first post-economic modern state. It was stunningly radical in its post-Marxist viewpoint.

Production, the sacred cow (golden calf) of Marxist doctrine, the element he never questioned in his so-called revolutionary antithesis, was rejected as the root of enslavement. By extension, the technological thesis was antithetically opposed by a swing to primal social energies. The peasant was reinstated as the normative social being. Intellectuals, the elite of any high-tech society were denounced as anti-social and were purged. It was an uncompromising yet logical purification of the society, which contained in it elements of madness. A man found to possess a pair of spectacles was executed on the assumption that weak eyes implied a university education. Those who were not slaughtered were put to work in the fields with the peasants. High-tech hospitals were destroyed and herbalists and folk doctors called in. Again this resulted in nightmare scenes where student 'new doctors' performed operations without anaesthetics. All high technology equipment especially the motor car was destroyed.

Ironically, for the regime had gained power by modern weaponry! Yet the most significant element in the revolt against the total system of Zionist scientism was the decision to abolish the Bank of Cambodia, the monetary system, and return to commodity currency—in their case, rice.

It is not a question of finding all this macabre, it was horrific. Yet when man is driven to extremes it forces from him a crisis recognition of the true ills that beset him. It is his desperation that precludes him from finding the right cure.

The German people were not wrong in confirming Hitler's assessment of what had caused their downfall, their mistake was in accepting a dialectic which was so brutal it could only swing back on them. So with Pol Pot.

What is important to us is that the high-tech state has already been rejected as a historical possibility. It has been dismantled and there has been a radical return to commodity currency—the primal basis of human economics, we may say humanist economics.

So the idea is not 'idealist'. It is not a dream concept. It is already part of the landscape of our time. It must not be forgotten that Cambodia had been the victim of high technology in its ultimate form—saturation bombing by heavy bombers. It took a terrible and total anarchy to allow the necessary conditions to prevail.

Perhaps the most significant aspect of that story, and the most relevant to our claim, is that when the pendulum of power swung, the West found Pol Pot's forces to be the only element opposing a Russian repossession of Cambodia and so in turn backed him against them.

In renegotiating to accept him as the Cambodian leader the terms were significant. He was not requested to abjure from genocide. Nor was he asked to accept high-technology.

He was asked to guarantee the restoration of the monetary system!

After the Pope had presided over the Turkish coup d'etat, the American takeover of the great Turkish peoples, the first act of the 'international community' was not condemnation of the 'death of democracy'. It was the devaluation of the Turkish lira. So, the first blow paralyzed the body politic, while the second blow destroyed the economic liberty of the people, assuring for them slave status. The next act of total control was to grant them a massive loan with a now devalued currency.

In this way it was assured that the Turkish people could not be free by any conceivable means.

Unless!

It is now clear to the Turkish people's Islamic leadership that the way to recovery is the breaking of the monetarist control over them. A country breaking free of Zionist banking control must renege on its debt-imprisonment.

Return to commodity currency.

Destroy the computerised archivist principle of control.

By this one move a country can be free of the total Zionist magical and pharaonic method. Money must be rendered worthless, gold and diamonds, the fall-back systems, must be expropriated.

If there is an activation of commodity currency then the continent of Africa becomes massively wealthy — and Europe, with its depleted resources, bankrupt —which it already is.

THE INDIVIDUAL

We come lastly to the intriguing element, the rogue animal, the troublemaker, the emperor-slave—the human creature. The victim and the executioner.

We cannot but ask in this age of genocide, nuclear warfare, and computerized total control—what it is that lets man himself let IT happen?

How has this acquiescence set into the human character?

By what is man controlled from within?

He is not just the victim of social forces. He is also the author of social forces. The mythic dialogue of rabbinical Marxism, designed to sow havoc and reap investment, has no means to explain 'the phenomenon' of Stalin. It cannot say within its methodology how the individual can effect social change. The 'cult of personality' is not a viable counter to use in laying bare the social processes by which man himself activates for good or ill massive social upheavals. The term is not by definition Marxist, but personal stand thus 'bourgeois'!

In western thinking there is a false dialectic set up between the society and the individual. In all of this, the mythic western activity of 'art' is used to canalize personal energies from political targets. It must be understood that man is not in any way apart from his society, he is its product. The exception does not disprove the rule. But man is not created by the political nexus or the social institutions. To understand the human being we must look more deeply.

The human creature has three stages of growth, on these will depend his social and spiritual limits and capacities.

1. From conception to birth

2. From suckling to weaning

3. From weaning to walking.

The first zone is based entirely on the mother's social and personal well-being. The second on the communication between the mother and child. The third between the child and its total environment.

It is in this arena that a human being is set up.

It is the anti-scientific and nihilist manner in which children are brought into the world that has caused the genocidal and basically insane product of 'modern' society. With the propagation of the no-morality, no-limits of the insane Jewish psychiatrist Wilhelm Reich—the Zionist ideology imposed itself on the once puritanical Christian ethos of the united states. Within fifty years all sexual taboos and moral limits had been destroyed. Adultery was declared not only a norm but a sign of upward social mobility. Pre-marital sex was declared a sign of freedom and 'modern' enlightenment (another 18th century Masonic term!) Sexual deviation was a mark of political tolerance, opposition to it a sign of incipient fascism. Women were defined as being like negroes or Jews and had to be liberated.

A Jewish 'women's liberator' went to Iran in the middle of their titanic struggle to free themselves from israeli-american control trying to sow havoc without success. Yet she never tried to 'liberate' the orthodox Jewish woman, degraded, forbidden the synagogue, her head shaved bald, only permitted intercourse with a sheet between herself and her husband.

The extremes of the Reichian revolution are remarkable. Education was basically eliminated —for the teacher/student relationship was seen as tyrannical. A complete anarchy of individualist 'doing your thing' resulted. But the result was ironically the opposite of the rhetoric.

Everybody was 'free'—to be different. Then everybody was seen to be the same. Utterly conformist in their social behavior. Utterly obedient to the market commands of the consumer society. Utterly in the thrall of the banking syndrome.

In debt—the person like the state—to an invisible network of wealth and power that was nowhere accessible in real terms. Sexual and civic anarchy reigned and yet the populace had been reduced to slavish obedience. Controlled by an anti-education of laissez-faire tactics in childhood, in dialogued and monitored sexual expression in adolescence, in forced isolation in the work nexus, lonely in youth, lonely as a nuclear family, lonely in old age—the 'free' urban animal was the most abject and culturally barren human being in the history of the world.

Worse than all this: the 'freedom' of the western adolescent to ignore all social rules of courtesy, and morality in sex and civic behavior—'free' to live in a fantasy of Disneyland dream figures (from Yiddish mythology) and to practice endless game patterns of sport and imagination—all this was based on an economy of theft-of-resources from Africa and South America and East Asia, by the magical means of debt-system control brought about by the monetary system, the dollar its archetypal currency—a note which on its face openly declared the ideological method and system by which it enslaved the world—the masonic/jewish pyramid with the all-seeing and controlling eye of Zionist structuralist statism!

It is clear that the enslaved modern child is the result of a no-pattern anarchic upbringing. The autistic child is the result of a white-field experimental zone in its first three phases of existence—the first in the womb, being dependent on the open-space trauma of pregnancy instead of the traditional 'confinement'.

The modern society has lost the science of human education and replaced it with theory-based improvisations with a structuralist foundation. The American Dr. Spock after a lifetime advocating the no-hold, let-go principle in child-rearing, then in his old age admitted he was totally wrong. Yet it is this anti-system method that produces the zombie-like product which is totally acquiescent to stasis control—a much more powerful means of social tyranny than the brutal methods of gulagism, and aesthetically more pleasing!

So it is that for human beings to recover their humanity they must recover the pattern by which human beings are actually made — formed. Until this is done the tyrannies of the Zionist-controlled scientism can continue and this will lead inevitably to the acting out of the Masada complex—now, nuclear suicide with the Jewish bomb. For this is not a doctrine for life but for rigid power control. And that is opposed to life.

Death is rigid and life is fluid and pulsating and dynamic. Life is cyclical in a society as it is in an organism. And so pyramidism, high technology and its racist ideology, Zionism, cannot succeed.

The politics of the future will be spiritual. The economies of the future will be materials. The religion of the future will be Islam. Uncodified patterning. Non-statist community. Pre-systems legality sustaining personal illumination. A new dialectic.

S.A.A

England, 1982