2010 NIST 9/11 Footage Leaks Ignored

.
By Glenn Zarmanov, WeAreChangeNewJersey.COM

While everyone is focusing on WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, another important information dump is getting largely ignored since September 1, 2010 when James Gourley of the International Center For 9/11 Studies obtained nearly 5 terrabytes of videos and reports concerning the attacks on the WTC and Pentagon buildings.

HELP THIS STORY BREAK INTO THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA! OTHER WEBSITES NOW CARRYING THIS STORY:

http://whatreallyhappened.net/content/2010-nist-911-footage-leaks-ignored

http://www.prisonplanet.com/2010-nist-911-footage-leaks-ignored.html

http://911blogger.com/news/2010-12-07/2010-nist-911-footage-leaks-ignored

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread638313/pg1

Although some of the tapes have had some audio/video manipulation, it is clear why NIST did not want to release any of this material for the past 9 years. The 9/11 coverup demands that no evidence of explosions or bombs be included in the official story, and some of these videos have even been kept hidden simply for including the WORDS “bomb” or “explosion” in their contents.

Even Gourley’s organization itself has not had the time to examine and post all of the new evidence and so other 9/11 researchers have taken up the task of downloading the raw data from the “NIST Cumulus Database”

(http://911datasets.org/index.php/Main_Page)

and posting the converted videos to YouTube and elsewhere all over the internet. Here are some of the best channels to get started investigating the new evidence:

• youtube.com/ic911studies
• youtube.com/femr2
• youtube.com/wtcdemolitions
• youtube.com/sept11attacks
• youtube.com/xenomorph911wtc
• youtube.com/irancontrascumdid911

Julian Assange himself has stated that he is annoyed by the 9/11 truth movement, much like Jon Stewart and Glenn Beck have bashed us for asking questions.

(Wanted by the CIA: Julian Assange – Wikileaks founder)

His obsession with secrecy, both in others and maintaining his own, lends him the air of a conspiracy theorist. Is he one? “I believe in facts about conspiracies,” he says, choosing his words slowly. “Any time people with power plan in secret, they are conducting a conspiracy. So there are conspiracies everywhere. There are also crazed conspiracy theories. It’s important not to confuse these two. Generally, when there’s enough facts about a conspiracy we simply call this news.” What about 9/11? “I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud.” What about the Bilderberg conference? “That is vaguely conspiratorial, in a networking sense. We have published their meeting notes.”)

Ask yourself: why isn’t this being covered by WikiLeaks OR the mainstream media, who instead focuses on war logs that reveal nothing new? While WikiLeaks claims to have some raw data related to communications on 9/11

(Wikileaks’ Emotional Diary of September 11th)

Besides leaked documents, wikileaks also provides public access to data sets, such as when during a 24 hour period starting 3AM Wednesday 25th, 2009, the web page released half a million US national text pager intercepts; all of which stemmed from the “24 hour period surrounding the September 11, 2001 attacks in New York and Washington”.)

and other evidence proving the attacks were preplanned,

(WikiLeaks Suggests 9/11 Preplanned)

Of the virtual Tsunami released through the latest disclosure by WikiLeaks, the most dangerous is the revelation that United States officials in 1999 were pushing for a propaganda war, especially in Afghanistan and Pakistan, against Osama bin Laden before the deadly terror attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.)

no big deal has been made about these datasets either.

If you think that uncovering the truth about 9/11 is just as important as leaking info about the illegal wars and other government corruption, please help spread this article, write your own, or just share the videos below which have been compiled out of the raw information for your consideration. (NOTE: Nothing has been taken out of context, just abbreviated for easier viewing.)