St Einstein the 100% plagiarist

The name "Einstein" evokes images of genius, but was Albert Einstein, in fact, a plagiarist, who copied the theories of Lorentz, Poincare, Gerber, and Hilbert?

A scholarly documentation of Albert Einstein's plagiarism of the theory of relativity, Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist discloses Einstein's method for manipulating credit for the work of his contemporaries, reprints the prior works he parroted, and demonstrates through formal logical argument that Albert Einstein could not have drawn the conclusions he drew without prior knowledge of the works he copied, but failed to reference. Numerous republished quotations from Einstein's contemporaries prove that they were aware of his plagiarism. The book includes 567 endnotes, countless references and an index.

"As a matter of fact, reading this text should be a must for all people professionally interested in the history of Physics or of Science (for these readers the book, its "polemical" thesis notwithstanding, could become an indispensable tool, packed as it is with information, quotations, meticulous references, etc.), but it is highly recommended even to teachers, scientists of all kinds, philosophers, epistemologists, in general to every person interested in the evolution of human civilization and knowledge." -- Professor Umberto Bartocci in his review of Albert Einstein: the Incorrigible Plagiarist.

. . . "Albert Einstein the Incorrigible Plagiarist suggests that Einstein had a tendency to incorporate the work of contemporary scientists without properly crediting them, and even offers a body of evidence that his wife, Mileva Einstein-Marity, was the true author of his attributed works. Albert Einstein The Incorrigible Plagiarist is a fascinating, albeit controversial treatise, packed cover to cover with meticulous references to document and support its seemingly outrageous claim." -- Midwest Book Review.

In 1997, noted Einstein scholars Leo Corry, Juergen Renn and John Stachel attempted to rewrite the history of the gravitational field equations of the general theory of relativity. Their radical revisionism was largely based on a set of printer's proofs of an important paper by the world-famous mathematician David Hilbert, in which Hilbert published the field equations of general relativity five days before Einstein copied them from Hilbert. Corry, Renn and Stachel claimed that these printer's proofs of Hilbert's paper did not contain the equations which appeared in Hilbert's final published paper. However, in their 1997 article in the journal Science, "Belated Decision in the Hilbert-Einstein Priority Dispute," Corry, Renn and Stachel failed to disclose the fact that these printer's proofs were mutilated, and are missing a critical part--the very part which contained the equations Corry, Renn and Stachel claimed Hilbert did not know. Anticipations of Einstein in the General Theory of Relativity refutes the baseless historical revisionism of Corry, Renn and Stachel, and proves that Einstein did not originate any of the major concepts of the general theory of relativity by comparing the original source material by Einstein and his predecessors. Einstein even fudged his equations in order to achieve the results others had published long before him.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Albert Einstein The Incorrigible Plagiarist

Bjerknes, Christopher Jon, 1965- Albert Einstein : the incorrigible plagiarist / by Christopher Jon Bjerknes. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-9719629-8-7 (alk. paper) 1. Einstein, Albert, 1879-1955. 2. Physicists--Biography. 3. Relativity (Physics). 4. Physics--History--20th century. I. Title. QC16.E5 B57 2002 530'.092--dc21 2002005657

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Anticipations of Einstein in the General Theory of Relativity

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bjerknes, Christopher Jon, 1965- Anticipations of Einstein in the general theory of relativity / by Christopher Jon Bjerknes. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-9719629-6-0 (alk. paper) 1. General relativity (Physics)--History--20th century. 2. Einstein, Albert, 1879-1955. 3. Gravitation--History--20th century. 4. Mathematical physics. I. Title. QC173.6.B54 2003 530.11--dc22 2003019787

A synopsis of "Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist", which appeared in The Canberra Times A Response to John Stachel's Personal Attack in Infinite Energy Magazine Arguing About Einstein-Marity's Husband Einstein's Irrational Ontology of Redundancy The Special Theory of Relativity and Its Many Fallacies of Petitio Principii in Episteme A Short History of the Concept of Relative Simultaneity in the Special Theory of Relativity in Episteme The Speed of Gravity

Internet Resources for Mileva Einstein-Marity: Documentary: Einstein's Wife Einstein's Wife on amazon.com M. Maurer, "Weil nicht sein kann, was nicht sein darf... 'DIE ELTERN' ODER 'DER VATER' DER RELATIVITÄTSTHEORIE?", PCnews, Nummer 48, Jahrgang 11, Heft 3, Wien, (Juni, 1996), S. 20-27 "In Albert's Shadow: The Life and Letters of Mileva Maric, Einstein's First Wife" by Milan Popovic "Im Schatten Albert Einsteins" by Desanka Trbuhovic-Gjuric "Einstein's Wife: Work and Marriage in the Lives of Five Great Twentieth-Century Women" by Andrea Gabor Was Einstein's Wife Mileva His Silent Collaborator? Mileva Maric Mileva Maric on Wikipedia

Einstein's Plagiarism in the News: Alex Johnson, "The culture of Einstein", MSNBC, April 18, 2005 "Einstein: un genio del plagio" La Voz de Galicia (Spain), March 15, 2005 "Plagiat d'Einstein: le dossier" Polémia (France), February 26, 2005 "Was Einstein a Plagiarist?" The Register (UK), November 15, 2004 "Albert Einstein accused of stealing his theory of relativity!" Hindustan Times (India), December 1, 2004 "E=M thief squared" The Sun (UK), December 1, 2004 "Einstein da an cap y tuong?" Nguoi lao dong (Vietnam), November 17, 2004 "Lorentz, Poincaré et Einstein" L'Express (France), November 8, 2004 "News: Einstein -- Genius or Plagiarist?" EnergyGrid Magazine (USA), December 5, 2004 "Einstein plagiaire?" Le Nouvel Observateur (France), August 5, 2004 "Albert Einstein: Plagiarist of the Century" Nexus Magazine (Australia), December-January 2004 "Beyond the History of Time" The Hindu (India), September 18, 2003 "A theory of Einstein the irrational plagiarist" The Canberra Times (Australia), September 19, 2002 "Einstein's E=mc2 'was Italian's idea'" The Guardian (UK), November 11, 1999

Special Theory of Relativity, Jules Henri Poincare, Hendrik Antoon Lorentz, and Albert Einstein: Henri Poincare and Relativity Theory by A. A. Logunov, Former Vice-President of the Russian [Soviet] Academy of Sciences, and currently Director of the Institute for High Energy Physics A. A. Logunov, "Sur la dynamique de l'électron" LA RELATIVITÉ Poincaré et Einstein, Planck, Hilbert: Histoire véridique de la Théorie de la Relativité by Jules Leveugle Jules Leveugle's book on Amazon France Albert Einstein: UN EXTRAORDINAIRE PARADOXE by 1988 Economics Nobel Prize laureate Maurice Allais Relativistic Theory of Gravity (Horizons in World Physics) by A.A. Logunov Einstein et Poincaré by Jean-Paul Auffray on Amazon France. Comment le jeune et ambitieux Einstein s'est approprié la Relativité restreinte de Poincaré by Jean Hladik on Amazon France. "Henri Poincaré : A decisive contribution to Special Relativity. The short story" by Jacques Fric Einstein's Clocks, Poincare's Maps: Empires of Time by Peter Louis Galison "Henri Poincaré: a decisive contribution to Relativity" by Christian Marchal: Word.doc "Henri Poincaré: a decisive contribution to Relativity" by Christian Marchal: HTML

General Theory of Relativity, Paul Gerber, David Hilbert, Albert Einstein: F. Winterberg, The Einstein Myth and the Crisis in Modern Physics. I. McCausland, "Anomalies in the History of Relativity", Journal of Scientific Exploration, Volume 13, Number 2, (1999), pp. 271-290. The following journal articles discredit Leo Corry, Juergen Renn and John Stachel's baseless and radical historical revisionism: Prof. Friedwardt Winterberg's paper discrediting Corry, Renn and Stachel's revisionism: "On 'Belated Decision in the Hilbert-Einstein Priority Dispute', published by L. Corry, J. Renn, and J. Stachel", Zeitschrift fuer Naturforschung A, Volume 59a, Number 10, (October, 2004), pp. 715-719. Abstract for Prof. Friedwardt Winterberg's paper discrediting Corry, Renn and Stachel's revisionism. Table of Contents for Zeitschrift fuer Naturforschung A, Volume 59a. A. A. Logunov, M. A. Mestvirishvili and V. A. Petrov, "How Were the Hilbert-Einstein Equations Discovered?" Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk, Volume 174, Number 6, (June, 2004), pp. 663-678. An English translation of A. A. Logunov, M. A. Mestvirishvili and V. A. Petrov, "How Were the Hilbert-Einstein Equations Discovered?" Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk, Volume 174, Number 6, (June, 2004), pp. 663-678. An alternative English translation was published in the Physics-Uspekhi: A. A. Logunov, M. A. Mestvirishvili and V. A. Petrov, "How Were the Hilbert-Einstein Equations Discovered?" Physics-Uspekhi, Volume 47, Number 6, (June, 2004), pp. 607-621. T. Sauer, "The Relativity of Discovery: Hilbert's First Note on the Foundations of Physics", Archive for History of Exact Sciences, Volume 53, Number 6, (1999), pp. 529-575. Leo Corry, Jürgen Renn and John Stachel's 1997 article in Science, which does not mention the mutilation of Hilbert's proofs: "Belated Decision in the Hilbert-Einstein Priority Dispute", Science, Volume 278, (14 November 1997), pp. 1270-1273.