.
By Francis A. Boyle
  “The
 2010 Nuclear Posture Review established the Administration’s goal to 
set conditions that would allow the United States to safely adopt a 
policy of making deterrence of nuclear attack the sole purpose of U.S. 
nuclear weapons. Although we cannot  adopt such a policy today, the new 
guidance re-iterates the intention to work towards that goal over time.”
In
 other words, “nuclear deterrence” is not now and has not been the 
policy of the Obama administration going back to and including  their 
2010 Nuclear Posture Review as well. 
Since “nuclear deterrence” 
is not now and has never been the Obama administration’s nuclear weapons
  policy from the get-go, then by default this means that offensive 
first-strike  strategic  nuclear war  fighting is now and has always 
been the Obama administration’s nuclear weapons policy. 
This policy will also be pursued and augmented by means of  “integrated non-nuclear strike options.” (Ibid).
  
Therefore
 the entire 2013 NPR and Obama’s recent nuclear arms “reduction” 
 proposals must be understood within this context of the United States 
pursuing an offensive, strategic first-strike  nuclear war-fighting 
capability as augmented by non-nuclear strike forces:
“After
 a comprehensive review of our nuclear forces, the President has 
determined that we can ensure the security of the United States and our 
Allies and partners and maintain a strong and credible strategic 
deterrent while safely pursuing a one-third reduction in deployed 
nuclear  weapons from the level established  in the New START Treaty.” 
Id. at 6.
And
 we know now for sure that all the Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) 
 systems that Obama is currently in the process of deploying in Europe, 
Asia, and the United States, on land, at  sea and perhaps in Outer Space
 are designed to provide the United States with a  strategic, 
 offensive, first strike nuclear war fighting capability against Russia 
and China and Iran and North Korea and Syria  for starters. The latter 
three because the United States has taken the position that they are not
 in compliance with their obligations under the Nuclear  
Non-Proliferation Treaty: “…the United States has relied increasingly on
 non-nuclear elements to strengthen regional security architectures, 
including a forward U.S. conventional  presence and effective theater 
ballistic missile defenses…” Id. at 9.
 So
  the United States government  is currently preparing to launch, wage 
and win an offensive,  first-strike strategic nuclear war against 
Russia, China, Iran, North Korea and Syria. 
All the rest is just palaver. Including by our Dissembler-in-Chief. An “honors”  graduate of Harvard Law School.
Professor Francis A. Boyle,  Author, The Criminality of  Nuclear Deterrence (Clarity Press: 2002)
http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-prepares-to-wage-offensive-first-strike-strategic-nuclear-warfare-against-russia-china-iran-north-korea-and-syria/5340299
 
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home