Tunisia, Gaddafi, Al-Qaradhawi, Islamism, Pan-Arabism, Tyranny, Democracy and Freemasonry

e.

By Prof. Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis


1. Tunisia: a Popular Revolt, a Freemasonic Conspiracy or a US – French Political Barter Trade?

The recent events in Tunisia that seem to have culminated with Zine al Abedine Ben Ali’s departure from Tunis have fascinated a great number of political observers, heads of state, religious leaders, and people from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Many viewed in this introductory development the beginning of the end for all the colonially imposed tyrants who happen to rule the gravely unfortunate countries whereby Arabic is the official language.

Widespread literature joyfully heralding similar positive developments anywhere from Morocco to Yemen and from Kuwait to Syria finds its way to the world’s most ‘authoritative’ mass media, the leading newspapers, and the most influential dailies ad weeklies.

When one notices newspapers like Le Figaro, New York Times, Frankfurter Allgemeine, Le Monde, Washington Post, The Times, and Corriere della Sera enthusiastically support the Tunisian street protesters and insurgents, one wonders whether the same newspapers would support rioters and demonstrators spreading chaos in Paris, London, Berlin, New York and Rome. Certainly not!

If the Freemasonic regime, which rules tyrannically the West and (through the West) almost the entire world and controls every word written in the aforementioned newspapers, supports this development, we have to immediately understand that the street manifestations in Tunis were simply orchestrated to effectively suit their propaganda and agenda.

Still there are many, either in the Arabic speaking world or anywhere else, who believe that this development represents a genuine, non-orchestrated, popular demonstration. The people who believe so are either extremely gullible or dramatically hopeless.

The Western Freemasonic mass media establishments are characterized by a great past of partiality, bias, mendacity and falsification; these are the establishments that report unimportant developments and disregard serious events for the only sake of their own criminal interests that they systematically and exclusively defend and promote. Two weights and two measures: this is the evil concept and policy that prevail in their minds and characterize their acts.

On the other hand, there have been few courageous supporters who opposed the mainstream opinion and rejected the interpretation of the world’s influential mass media and the Freemasonic regimes - according to which the Tunis events were a popular revolt. They were however tied with tyrannical regimes or they represented them from top positions. The most vocal case was that of Muammar al Qadhafi (Gaddafi) who despised the Tunisian people in general and the demonstrators in particular.

This creates a need for clarification. It would be quite naive to believe that a true divide came to surface with the European and North American, ‘democratic’ countries siding with the oppressed majority of the Arabic speaking tyrannical countries against the ruling elites and the local dictators, who try to preserve their advantages and consolidate their position.

The divide ‘Western’ and ’Arab’ ‘democrats’ vs. Arab dictators is a fake.

If the Western countries – or even some political parties, statesmen, diplomats, intellectuals, and academia in a Western country – are really opposed to an Arab dictator (or to all of them), they have all the means needed to destabilize and overthrow the targeted person and regime. This is valid now and this was valid before 20 years as well.

If the Europeans, who are so happy today because of the Tunisian regime being overthrown, wanted to really overthrow Zine al Abedine Ben Ali in the 90s, they could easily effectuate the change then.

In fact, it is not the Tunisian people (or just the demonstrators) who forced the former president to escape; it’s the generals who forced him – using as pretext the heavy casualties occurred during the tumultuous manifestations. In a meeting with powerful generals, Zine al Abedine Ben Ali lost effectively every element of power. He left immediately after.

However, the details of the developments reveal a mere theatrical act; some form of clandestine organization, composed mainly out of left wing Tunisian students and workers who had spent some years in France, gathered a small initial support and soon after undertook the early manifestations.

At the same time, some people with key positions in the police and the administration demanded that the early manifestations be met with a strong response from the police and the army. These people had also spent years in France whereby they received colonial education and Freemasonic initiation.

With these two different groups under control and stage-managed superbly, the second act (deterioration in the streets and national worries in the controlled mass media) and the third act (intervention of the well-decided Tunisian generals who had been initiated in the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge in France) of the play had to be performed. This was enough for Zine al Abedine Ben Ali and his wife to take 1.5 ton of gold and leave the country.

This chain of developments could have taken place any time in the past, but it seems that the whole story bears witness to a great deal of political barter trade between the US (a former strong supporter of Zine al Abedine Ben Ali) and France (a cruel enemy of Zine al Abedine Ben Ali who – quite tellingly – was not accepted in France!); in exchange of true French support and commitment in Afghanistan, the US regime sold the Tunisian idiot who had imagined that he reserved the US support forever.

Nobody told Zine al Abedine Ben Ali that you can never trust a single word that goes out of the filthy and desecrated mouth of a Freemasonic Satanist. This was his mistake. Quite unfortunately, many others make the same mistake; it’s high time that they wakeup before they fly to Saudi Arabia.....

But then, how could one explain Muammar Gaddafi’s outburst? If we assume that, after many long years of clashes with many Western countries, the Libyan dictator found a way of befriending the West and cooperating with several European governments (thanks to his son Seifulislam’s debauchery in Paris), why did he then attack the developments so bitterly? As an ally of the European capitals, he should also ‘sell’ his former Tunisian counterpart and look forward to Libya’s democratization; but he did not do so. Why?

The reason is simple; members of Freemasonic regimes need friends and co-operators, allies and interlocutors everywhere, and so they do when it comes to Libya. But Freemasons need interlocutors and allies in order to confuse and deceive them! Not to tell them the truth....

The truth is already not said from one Freemason to the other; how could it be possibly said to an outsider and an outcast?

The bitter reality is rather simple; by befriending with Western Freemasonic regimes, Gaddafi exposed himself to their sophisticated falsehood, deceptive schemes, and unadulterated lies that serve the villainous Freemasonic gangsters who rule England, France and America to easily manipulate the developments they want to trigger and to stage-manage the theatre of destruction throughout the world. In private, they say to Gaddafi that they are against the Tunis events and that they highly appreciated Zine al Abedine Ben Ali.....

Some issues are personal; and the worst personal damage that can happen to a Freemason is to be stolen by a non Freemason; these evil persons take it very badly, because money is their sole ‘god’ and because they are idiotic enough to believe in their intellect’s superiority. In such cases, revenge is imperatively taken, and the cost of a human life can suddenly become next to nothing.

Why among all the relatives of Zine al Abedine Ben Ali, his nephew, Imed Trabelsi, was butchered in a merciless way? Why bother to kill - with such passion, with such determination, and with such hatred - someone who was not in the front line of the Tunisian political life, being a mere businessman?

It looks awkward only if you never heard of Zionists and Freemasons; actually, Imed Trabelsi had stolen the lavish yacht of a French Jew and Freemason, Bruno Roger, the chairman of the French firm Lazard; this guy is an acknowledged arms dealer of the worst sort. And subsequently, for the Satanists who rule France, the account had to be regulated – even as a part of a ‘’popular revolt’’.















2. Tunisia, Gaddafi, Al-Qaradhawi, Islamism, Pan-Arabism, Tyranny, Democracy and Freemasonry

I summarily specified that the overwhelming mass media support to the ongoing changes of regime in Tunisia bear witness to the evident Freemasonic – Zionist support of the development, while at the same time reflecting a secretive US – French political barter trade in which the Obama administration sold out the former Tunisian president and puppet. Obscure figures, like the French Jew and Freemason Bruno Roger, the chairman of the French firm Lazard, had also a role to play in the events that only have an appearance of the promise for a better future for all the Tunisians.

At the same time, the fearful ‘Arab’ dictators who, ignorant and demented, denigrate the political developments in Tunis, fail to understand that through their earlier and idiotic compromises with the colonial regimes of London, Paris and Washington, they have only turned themselves into puppets of the said regimes, and therefore their reaction against the orchestrated demonstrations at Tunis greatly help their masters to stage-manage the forthcoming developments.

There is another parameter of the theatrical events that one must not ignore. Far from the noise of the Tunisian streets, safe from the bullets of the local police, joyfully living a lavish life that is reserved for the few top puppets of the international Freemasonry and Zionism, extremist sheikhs supported by the US, UK, French regimes welcome a brilliant future for the peoples of the region, if the orchestrated developments of Tunis happen to be repeated in Algiers, Tripoli, Khartoum, Cairo, Damascus and Amman.

These are the sheikhs of Satan; a typical example of extreme immorality, unprecedented deviance, and incomparable betrayal is the sheikh Al-Qaradhawi who, supported by the paedophile pseudo-princes of Qatar, evangelizes a supposedly Islamic Caliphate as supreme stage of the modern Islamism.

The evil, pseudo-Islamic state that the ignorant and pathetic sheikh evangelizes would bring forth the end of Islam itself, because this is the target of the Freemasonic Orientalists who fabricated Islamism in their ateliers in Paris, London, Sorbonne, Oxford and Cambridge, and then projected it on the gullible and ignorant sheikhs of the detached Ottoman provinces. What sheikh Al-Qaradhawi ignores is that he personally stands on evil Western money (Qatari, Saudi and Emirati money being also Western), support, and 213-year anti-Islamic conspiracy. If for a moment the imbecile sheikh were perilous to the West, they would have poisoned him at ease.

I will herewith republish the idiotic discourses of the Libyan tyrant Muammar Gaddafi and the pathetic sheikh Al-Qaradhawi; I also add excerpts from the political nonsense aired by Rachid Al-Ghannouchi, a Tunisian Islamist opposition leader in exile. The discourses help understand the complete control of the socio-political life of the Muslim countries, as operated by the Freemasonic – Zionist regimes of Paris, London and Washington; the discourses have been widely published, but here I reproduce them from ANHRI, a Freemasonic puppet institution that appears masqueraded as ‘Arab democratic network’, and from MEMRI, a Zionist organization that closely monitors developments throughout Islam, without Muslims knowing anything about it.

I will further expand on the evil anti-Islamic trickery in forthcoming articles. Before republishing the discourses and excerpts, I want to make clear a few points:

a. Islamism – It has nothing to do with Islam either as political ideology or as political practice; Islam means Islamic Caliphate, a humanistic empire based on Islam’s religious principles, Islamic Science, Islamic Knowledge, Islamic Art, and Islamic Noblesse. Islam means Ottoman Empire; it is not by coincidence that the modern evil, heretic and Freemasonic ideology of Islamism grew on Islamic territories detached from their rightful owner and colonized by the English and the French. It is not by coincidence that all the early Islamists were traitors of the Ottoman Empire, having been wanted by the Sultan’s secret services, only to be thoroughly protected by the secret services and the military of the regimes that fabricated the Zionist, Anti-Jewish, Ant-Christian, and Anti-Islamic state of fake Israel. Modern Islamism goes in parallel with the fake state Israel, because they both are the products of the Satanic organization of Freemasonry.

b. Pan-Arabism – It is another fallacy fabricated by the evil Freemasonic Orientalist ateliers of the French and the English. It is a mixture of socio-behavioural system and political ideology fabricated out of the lewd, the trash and the social excrement of the Ottoman Empire. Pan-Arabism was geared as "bon pour l’ Orient", a fake system to be projected and implemented (through use of local social trash thoroughly corrupted by the colonials, of ignorant pseudo-intellectuals, and of vicious traitors) among non-Arab societies. Tunisia is a non-Arab country, because the local population is entirely Berberic – Amazigh, having no relation with the Arabs of Hedjaz. The same concerns Libya, Morocco, Algeria, Mauritania, Mali, and Niger; furthermore Egypt and Sudan are not ‘Arab’ but Hamitic – Kushitic countries totally unrelated to the Semites. In addition, Yemen and Oman are not ‘Arab’ countries but of Yemenite Semitic origin (which is in total contradiction to the Arabs of Hedjaz). Finally, the populations of Lebanon, Syria, Palestine, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Emirates, and the Saudi North are not ‘Arab’ but Aramaean. Imposition of Pan-Arabism on these populations is tantamount to national, cultural and spiritual genocide, and this is the epitome of the Freemasonic, Anglo-French colonial presence in these areas.

c. Tyranny – This term was not pejorative in Ancient Greece where it originates from. It is used today to denigrate rulers whom the Freemasonic – Zionist – Satanic mass media want to eliminate for their own benefit, and as per the agenda of their hidden Satanic masters. Either these rulers, the ‘tyrants’, have been cruel to their peoples or not is immaterial to the international Freemasonic syphilis of mass media. It must therefore not be taken into consideration by anyone willing to be distant to the evilness of Freemasonry.

d. Democracy – This word is the most denigrated term of all times, because there has never been a democratic society in the West, which deceitfully evangelizes democratic societies only to turn these realms, once constituted as ‘democracies’, to evil Freemasonic tyrannies.

e. Freemasonry – It is well known that this organization is not compatible with Islam, Christianity and Judaism or any other religion worldwide. Those pretending the opposite are criminal Freemasonic liars and by pretending this, they must be considered as the real enemies of the Mankind. What is however less known is that Freemasonry is not compatible with the status of Human Being. Its secretive character clearly and irrevocably determines its Satanic character; God did not create any Human Being in order to allow secrets to be kept or unveiled at will by anyone. By being Freemason, you simply cease to be a Human Being.

1. Tunisia / Libya: The 41- year old dictatorship Ruler Denies the Right of the Tunisian People to Freedom and Decent Life. Several Human Rights Organizations Slam the Libyan President Muammar Qaddafi for Defying the Tunisian People’s Will for Liberty and Democracy
http://www.anhri.net/en/?p=1967

Cairo, January 18th, 2010

Human rights organizations signatories to this statement denounce the encroachment on the right of the people of Tunisia and the Arab peoples to get rid of tyrannical and corrupt governments and building democratic states by their own free will. The Libyan leader, Muammar Gaddafi, who is now in power for 41 years made a televised speech in which he addressed the Tunisian people and stated that he wished that Ben Ali remained president for life!

As the Tunisian people move with strong pace towards democracy and to the full right to free speech by forcing the dictator, Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, to flee the country, the Libyan dictator defied their will in his speech as he wished that Ben Ali were president for life!!

"I consider Ben Ali the best President for Tunisia at all", said Gaddafi.

"I visited Tunisia many times and found that the Tunisian people was quite contented, he added, forgetting the suppression of freedoms, corruption and arresting militants, politicians and human rights activists, the besieged journalists and media workers and restrictions on Internet freedom".

Gaddafi said nothing about unemployment and poor economic conditions which prevailed in the era of Ben Ali. They are the very reasons that led to the violation of the people of Tunisia, which sparked from Sidi Bou Zeid in protest to the poverty and unemployment.

In addition, the Libyan ruler statements implied severe undermining on the Tunisian revolution,

"What revolution will break prison gates and free all prisoners to tin order that they will terrorize citizens", asked Gaddafi, denying that Ben Ali is responsible for stuffing prisons with political prisoners, journalists and activists without fair trials or charge but enjoying their right to peaceful expression.

Organizations consider these statements typical of Gaddafi who seized power in Libya 41 yeas ago in a military coup. As well, in 1980 he was involved in an instability and chaos wave in Tunisia. His wish that Ben Ali were ruler for life is a projection of his own will to stay in power for life as he is the heads the oldest atrocious dictatorship in the Arab world.

The undersigned urges Arabs to disregard such negative statements that seize the rights of people in democracy, coming from a dictator who has been years leading an authoritarian rule for tens of years.

For more information:

Arabic Pinochet Escape from Tunisia Will Not Spare Him Legal pursuit Shame on All Dictators in The Arab World
http://www.anhri.net/en/?p=1946

Tunisia Ousted Dictator Enjoys Saudi Hospitality Has Saudi Arabia Become A Waste Dump For Tyrants?!! The Arabic Network Requests the Extradition and Trial of Arabic Pinochet in Tunisia -- http://www.anhri.net/en/?p=1949

The Long-Aged Dictatorship 40 Years of Qaddafi Rule in Libya -- http://www.anhri.net/en/?p=1493

Signatory Organizations:

1 – The Arabic Network for Human Rights Information
2 – Association of Human Rights Legal Aid
3 – Hisham Mubarak Law Center
4 – Arabic Foundation to support civil society and human rights
5 – Reporters Without Rights
6 – CTUWS
7 – Association for Freedom of Thought and Expression
8 – The Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights
9 – Arab Organization for Penal Reform
10 – Human Rights Association for the Assistance of Prisoners
11 – Land Center for Human Rights
12 – Andalus Institute for Tolerance and Anti-Violence
13 – The Egyptian Association for Community Participation Enhancement
14 – Nadim Center for Psychological Treatment and Rehabilitation of Victims of Violence
15 – The Egyptian Center for Economic and Social Rights

2. MEMRI TV Clips From Al-Jazeera: Al-Qaradhawi, Al-Qadhafi, Tunisian Islamist Opposition Leader on the Tunisian Uprising

Following are MEMRI TV clips of comments from Al-Jazeera TV on the Tunisian uprising, by prominent Sunni Sheikh Yousuf Al-Qaradhawi, Libyan Leader Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi, and Tunisian Islamist opposition leader in exile Rachid Al-Ghannouchi.

Leading Sunni Scholar Yousuf Al-Qaradhawi Says to Ousted President Ben Ali: "You Idiot! It Took Four Weeks and Hundreds of Casualties for You to Get It?!"
Following are excerpts from an address by leading Sunni scholar Sheikh Yousuf Al-Qaradhawi, which aired on Al-Jazeera TV on January 16, 2011:

To view this clip on MEMRI TV, visit: http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/2761.htm.

Sheikh Yousuf Al-Qaradhawi: "We salute the [Tunisian] people, which has taught the Arab and Islamic peoples, as well as the oppressed peoples in general, the following lesson: Do not despair, and do not fear the tyrants, for the tyrants are weaker than a fly, and more feeble than a spider-web. They quickly collapse in the face of the power of steadfast and resolute peoples. [...]"

"After these words of salutation, we would like to advise the Tunisian people to protect its achievements, which it gained only with the blood of free people, with the lives that were lost, and with the pure blood that was shed.

"The thieves of the revolutions must not deceive or make a mockery of the people. There are people who steal revolutions from their owners. They excel at this. I would like to warn the Tunisians to be on the lookout for such people. [...]
"Let me ask the new president, Mr. [Fouad] Mebazaa, why he hasn't published, since he came... He should have begun by releasing the political prisoners, who were unjustly thrown into prison, merely because they held opposing views. They must be set free".
"The detainees who have been held without trial and without evidence must be released immediately. Some things must not be postponed. Freedom must be made available to all – to all those whose hands were shackled or whose tongues were silenced, so that they would not speak or express a view regarding the building and revival of their country. All these people must be set free".

"I have often said, on this TV show as well as on others, that as far as I am concerned, freedom takes precedence over the implementation of the shari'a. There must be no restrictions on liberties".

"How is it possible that the tyrant has been toppled, yet liberties remain [restricted]? I am astounded by this. The tyrant has fallen, yet his followers remain in power." [...]

Interviewer: "This revolution began when a young man set himself on fire, in protest against the injustice he suffered, and so on. One of our viewers, Abdallah Ja'far, asks: Is the case of Mohamed Bouazizi, which led to the Tunisian uprising, an exceptional form of Jihad against the oppressor, or was it suicide?"

Sheikh Yousuf Al-Qaradhawi: "Anybody who considers the matter in a comprehensive manner undoubtedly sees that this young man and others like him had mitigating circumstances. These [rulers] have brought the people to a state of psychological crisis. In my view, he was not free when he made this decision. He was seething from within. [...]"

"The tyrants never listen and never heed advice, until they are toppled. Once they are toppled... After four weeks, Ben Ali said: I get it. You idiot! It took four weeks and hundreds of casualties for you to get it?! Why didn't you get it during all this time? This is the case with all the tyrants."

Libyan Leader Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi to the Tunisians: "You Have Brought Shame upon the Arab Peoples".

Following are excerpts from an address by Libyan leader Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi, which aired on Al-Jazeera TV on January 14, 2011:

To view this clip on MEMRI TV, visit http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/2760.htm.

Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi: "Wikileaks, which people call 'Kleenex,' makes fun of you, and publishes information written by ambassadors who are liars, in order to pit peoples against one another and cause confusion. We have some of them here".

"We will place the ambassadors who wrote this on trial. We will take them to court, either as witnesses or as the accused. They should prove the truth of what they wrote to Washington about Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, or France. We will place them on trial".

"First, we will treat them as witnesses. Prove to us that such corruption exits. If you wrote that such-and-such a company exists in such-and-such a place, you should prove that such a company exists. If it doesn't exist, it means you lied, and you become an accused".

"Why shouldn't the U.S. ambassador be placed on trial? They place heads of state on trial. They order to bring [Omar] Al-Bashir to court, the Liberian president to court, and the president of Yugoslavia to court. Yet a U.S. ambassador cannot be placed on trial?! He will be placed on trial, if he lied. [...]"

"Even you, my Tunisian brothers, may have read nonsense by this Kleenex on the Internet. Any drunken idiot can write whatever he likes on the Internet, and people believe him. The Internet is like a garbage bin. Any dimwit, any dog, any liar, any drunk, any opium addict can say whatever he likes on the Internet, and you read it and believe him. Talking is free. Should we become victims of Facebook, of Kleenex, and of YouTube? [...]"

"You call this a revolution, but is there any respectable revolution in which people go the prisons and free the worst criminals and murderers? You let them roam the streets at night, with their knives, to terrorize Tunisian families. You call this a revolution?! Dozens of wretched people are killed in prison... "

"Tunisia, I'm sad to say, is entering a state of anarchy, the end of which is unknown. Tomorrow, the entire Tunisian people might enter Libya. That's why what happens in Tunisia is of great interest to me. [...]"

"The Tunisians are a cultured people, respected and esteemed by all. Is it like in Romania, in the days of Ceausescu, or like in Kenya? It matters to me, for Tunisia is an Arab country. You have brought shame upon the Arab peoples with what you have done. [...]"

"Zine [Al-Abidine Ben Ali] is the best leader for Tunisia. That is truth. He brought Tunisia to where it is today. I don't care if you are for or against him, if you love him or hate him. I am telling you the truth. Zine hasn't given me money, glory, or anything in return. But I am telling you the truth." [...]

Rachid Al-Ghannouchi, Tunisian Islamist Opposition Leader in Exile, Calls to Topple the Dictatorship.

Following are excerpts from an interview with Rachid Al-Ghannouchi, a Tunisian Islamist opposition leader in exile, which aired on Al-Jazeera TV on January 15, 2011:

To view this clip on MEMRI TV, visit http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/2759.htm.

Rachid Al-Ghanouchi: "I salute the Tunisian youth and women, who have managed to teach the greatest dictator in Tunisian history a lesson. They kept chanting: 'Ben Ali, you coward, Tunisia will never be humiliated.' Indeed, Allah has made their hopes come true, and Ben Ali turned out to be a coward, and fled like a mouse in the still of night. [...]"

"What remains is for them not to make do with the toppling of the dictator, but to bring down the dictatorship. There still is a dictatorship in Tunisia. The ruler is gone, but the regime remains. It is evident in the constitution itself".

"The Tunisian constitution was tailored to the needs of the dictator, who has taken control of the entire country. This dictatorship is evident in the laws pertaining to the political parties. There is a complete legal system. The police is unrestrained. The dictatorship is evident in the entire structure of this state, which was tailored to the needs of a single political party. Consequently, it has turned into a mafia state, a police state, and a dictator state." [...]

About The Author: Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis - is Orientalist, Assyriologist, Egyptologist, Iranologist, Islamologist, Historian and Political Scientist. Dr. Megalommatis, 52, is the author of 12 books, dozens of scholarly articles, hundreds of encyclopedia entries, and thousands of articles. He speaks, reads and writes more than 15, modern and ancient, languages.

Notes
1 More on Imed Trabelsi:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imed_Trabelsi
http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2009/08/20/01016-

2 Picture: A popular revolt for a yacht: this is so Freemasonic!
From: http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2009/08/20/01016-20090820ARTFIG00499-le-proces-d-un-reseau-franco-tunisien-de-voleurs-de-yachts-cree-la-polemique-.php

For the full picture see:

The Darker Side of 911 and the France-UK connection

.