"The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world domination by the dissolution of other races...and by the establishment of a world republic in which everywhere the Jews will exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the Children of Israel...will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition..." (Karl Marx in a letter to Baruch Levy, quoted in Review de Paris, June 1, 1928, p. 574)

Sunday, 11 January 2009

The Rise of the Jewish Empire in North America

by Bob Finch

America may have lost the war against vietnam but it has never been invaded or conquered by external forces since its declaration of independence. But since the second world war and, in particular the establishment of the terrorist state refered to as Israel, it has been conquered from within. Wasps no longer have any significant control over american politics or its foreign policies

The israelis in america control the republican party and the democratic party and even the green party. They control the left wing of american politics (noam chomsky, stephen zunes) almost as much as they control the extreme right wing. They control congress. Jack abramoff apparently had in the region of 60 members of congress on his payroll. And these were not insignificant members of congress either since he funded tom delay who
provided dick cheney’s power base. This israeli was not only funding american goys but terrorists in the jews-only state. And this is the political influence of just one jewish billionaire. When aipac and all the other jewish lobbying groups in america, whose prime loyalties are to the jews-only state in palestine, are taken into consideration, the jews are financing virtually all members of congress. These days when american politicians talk about the need to defend their country from external threats what they mean is any challenge to the jews-only state in palestine.

The israelis control vast slabs of the bush administration. "The neoconservatives …
control the Office of the President, the Office of the Vice President, the Department of
State, the Department of Defense, and the police-state apparatus known as "Homeland
Security." (Paul Craig Roberts ‘Outfoxed by bin Laden’). Wayne madsen has suggested they’re
aiming to take control of the super secret National Security Agency (NSA) - America's
premier electronic surveillance body. "What has some NSA officials worried is that with
pro-Israeli neocons now engrained within the CIA, Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA),
State Department, and National Security Council, NSA is ripe for penetration by Israeli

With outside contractors now permeating NSA and a major Israeli espionage
operation being discovered inside the Pentagon, once again there is a fear within NSA
that foreign intelligence services such as the Mossad could make another attempt to
penetrate America's virtual "Fort Knox" of intelligence treasures and secrets." (Wayne
Madsen ‘The neocon power grab at NSA and an attempt to stifle the press’

Israelis own and control the american media. They compose the largest group of
billionaires in america who fund a vast network of political research organizations
which determine the views of america’s jewish owned media and america’s jewish funded

In 1950s america, as in many other western countries, there were taboos preventing
people from talking about a range of social issues such as homosexuality, incest, male
rape, etc, etc. These days nobody would think twice about discussing these issues. The
only taboos in the western world these days have to do with jews. There is a taboo about
jewish funding of political parties (in america and britain). There is a taboo against
the influence of the jewish lobby on american politicians. There is a taboo about jewish
attempts to take over the russian economic and political system. There is a taboo about
the tribute payments that america makes to its jewish masters in the jews-only state in
palestine. "The Congress, the Executive branch, state and local governments, and
national and local media have all come under the influence of the Jewish "lobby’s"
pro-Israel agenda to the point that none or few dare to criticize Israel or its US
representatives." (James Petras ‘The meaning of war: A heterodox perspective’

The israelis have even transformed christianity in america. There are now tens of
millions of so-called christian zionists who have come to believe in the zionist god of
vengeance rather than the christian god of forgiveness. They no longer live on a god
given planet but focus solely on the god given land of palestine. The devotion of these
dechristianized zionists to the sacred jewish land of palestine and jews-only state in
palestine is such that one of them blurted out at a major conference the logical outcome
of their beliefs. 'I love America,' Arthur said, her voice quivering with emotion. 'But
if it came to a choice between Israel and America, I would stand with Israel.'"
(Christian Zionist author, Kay Arthur of Precepts Ministries quoted in Justin Raimondo
‘Putting Israel First’ http://www.antiwar.com/blog/index.php?id=0).

There is not the slightest doubt that the american military is by far and away the most
formidable military power in the world. But who controls that military is an entirely
different matter. The american politicians who dictate military policy are not wasps but
israelis - agents of the jews-only state in palestine. So, in effect the jews-only state
controls american politicians who control the american military which wages war for the
sake of jewish world domination.

There is no such thing as an american empire. America does not have an empire. On the
contrary, america has become part of the jewish empire which dictates america’s domestic
and foreign policies. The policies that america is pursuing in the middle east have
nothing to do with america’s national interests – on the contrary, over the last four
decades it has been forced to fight the wars on behalf of its jewish master. In the
so-called yom kippur war of 1973 the americans were forced to back the jews-only state
against the encircling arab armies which resulted in an arab oil boycott that pushed
america and the world economy into a recession which lasted nearly a decade. If america
had sided with the arabs it would have enjoyed an economic bonanza selling american
goods to secular arab consumer societies. If the jews-only state did not exist there
would have been peace and stability in the middle east which would have boosted global
prosperity. Instead, america’s jewish masters have cost america vast economic losses,
the losses of many american troops, and the enmity of the arab and islamic world. "The
passionate attachment to Israel, the dual loyalty felt by many Americans -whereby
Israel's interests are put on the same or higher level than U.S. interests - has come
back to haunt the United States through the agency of a President willing to adopt the
most extravagant dreams of right wing Israelis and pro-Israeli hawks. The result is that
the full might of the world's only super power has been dragged into Israel's service
despite the costs, and the dangers and the folly of such a policy. Attachment to Israel
has come back to haunt America by enabling a decisive shift in U..S. policy away from
helping to preserve the peace and security of the world and turning the U.S. into an
aggressor nation, just as Israel has been and continues to be."
(Ronald Bleier ‘Invading Iraq: Converging u.s. and Israeli Agendas’

Iran’s so-called acquisition of nuclear weapons is a non-issue. And yet the jewish
empire has managed to coerce america, and thus the security council, into believing the
utter fantasy that it is a dire threat to world peace which must be placed at the top of
the global political agenda. Iran poses no military threat whatsoever to america, china,
russia or europe and yet they have all made this issue their most important foreign
policy. Watching america, china, russia, and europe, dancing to the paranoid fantasies
of the jews-only state in palestine is proof of jewish world domination.

There may be those who argue that just because america implements the foreign policies
of another state doesn’t mean to say that there isn’t an american empire which pursues
american interests around the rest of the world. But this is not the case. America’s
zionist foreign policy has drained american military resources so they cannot be used in
other places around the world. The jews in american politics and their shabbat goy
colleagues have become so focused on the middle east to protect the sacred judaic
headquarters of the jewish empire that they have ignored, or been unable to combat, the
rise of democratic forces in south america from where america imports a substantial
amount of its oil. Why is american foreign policy and military intervention focussed
almost solely on the middle east when countries on its own doorstep which provide it
with vast amounts of oil are being allowed to drift out of american control?

America’s policies towards russia have been shaped for the last forty years by neocons
originating from the office of the right wing democratic senator henry jackson. They
managed to abolish nixon’s détente with russia which could have resulted in a vast,
mutually beneficial, economic boom between the two countries. The neocons, however,
didn’t want any american rapproachment with the russians because russia poses the danger
of nuclear obliteration to the jews-only state in palestine. Once again, jewish
interests predominated over american interests and americans carried out the orders of
their jewish masters.

Israeli traitors control the american media, the republican and democratic parties,
congress, the pentagon, the office of homeland security, the cia, the defence
intelligence agency, the state department, the national security council, and the
presidency. The american military is implementing the foreign policies of the jews-only
state in palestine. There is nothing american left about america. Is it not true that,
"The neoconservatives are the greatest threat America has ever faced .." (Paul Craig
Roberts ‘Outfoxed by bin Laden’ http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=4898). The
battle for american independence was lost before most americans realized they were under
attack. America is now the biggest and most powerful colony in the jewish empire. "The
conventional wisdom which perceives world imperial powers dictating policy to lesser
regional powers clearly fails to deal with the US Middle East Wars. The reason why this
common sense notion is inadequate is because it fails to deal with a series of unique
(at least in modern history) phenomena affecting the policy-making structure of the US
Empire – the active role of a privileged and influential minority deeply embedded in the
decision-making structure and whose primary loyalty is to another state. It is as if the
State of Israel has ‘colonized’ the main spheres of political power in the imperial
state. These ‘colons’ however are not exactly transplants or emigrants from their
"mother country". Rather they have mostly grown up and have been educated in the
imperial center, they have pursued lucrative careers in the US and have, in most
instances, been strong supporters of US imperial expansion and militarism. They have
risen to and influenced the highest spheres of political power. They have not been
discriminated against, nor have they suffered any economic, social or political
exclusion. They have not been marginalized - they are integrated in the centers of
power. Yet they have set themselves apart from the rest of the US citizens and conceive
of themselves as having a special mission - of being first Jews who unconditionally
support the State of Israel and all of its international projections of power. How can
we explain this irrational embrace of a militarist state by a set of individuals who
only vicariously share its life and destiny?" (James Petras ‘The meaning of war: A
heterodox perspective’ http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=12606).

American slaves need to fight back against the jewish empire rather than pretending they
have an empire that acts in their name. They should see the palestinians as the leaders
in the fight against the world’s jewish oppressors. "The fact leftists bust a gut to
ignore -is that The Big Corporations would be far, far better off if the US switched
sides completely, and supported the Palestinians to the hilt. It is difficult to argue
this just because it is so screamingly obvious. The Big Corporations want oil: Israel
pisses off the oil producers, bigtime. Israel does not, contrary to leftist orthodoxy,
help the US control the oil." (Michael Neumann ‘A Study in Dogma: The Palestinians and
the Party Line’ http://www.counterpunch.org/neumann11182005.html).

Americans need to liberate themselves before they start helping to liberate the rest of
the world, "Regardless of the particular causes or principles that most move us, that
are closest to our hearts, no issue is of greater urgency than breaking the
Jewish-Zionist grip on American political, social and cultural life. As long as this
power remains entrenched, there will be no end to the systematic Jewish distortion of
history and current affairs, the Jewish-Zionist domination of the US political system,
Zionist oppression of Palestinians, the bloody conflict between Jews and non-Jews in the
Middle East, and the Israeli threat to peace." (Mark Weber ‘The Challenge of
Jewish-Zionist Power in an Era of Global Struggle’
http://www.ihr.org/other/thechallenge.html); "As we draw closer to a major confrontation
with Iran and Israeli officials set short-term deadlines for igniting a Middle East
conflagration, it seems that we are doomed to learn from future catastrophic losses that
Americans must organize to defeat political lobbies based on overseas allegiances."
(James Petras ‘Israel's War Deadline: Iran in the Crosshairs’

This material is available for republication as long as reprints include verbatim copy
of the article in its entirety, respecting its integrity. Reprints must cite the author
and iraq-war.ru as the original source including a "live link" to the article. Thank

The X Element: by "Y" and "Z"

In case you don't know, here is how it works. There are only about 5 million jews living
in USA. They control vast parts of the financial sector and of the media, and they own
an enormous share of US wealth, but most of the jews are only willing helpers, helping
the power to oppress the people in exchange for a higher standard of living and greater
privileges but without real power themselves. The element among the Jews who weild real
power let us call the "X Element." Wealthy X Element or X Element financiers or
banksters purchase majority shares in a company which then gives them control of the
company. Then this company buys controlling shares in two more companies-they then
control three companies. Then these two companies buy controlling shares in four
companies. This gives them control of seven companies. And on and on it goes. The
original wealthy X Element, X Element financier or X Element bankster has a controlling
interest in all of these companies including oil companies. They have been doing this
for a long time, most of what was referred to as "the British Empire" and later the
"American Superpower" period has been them doing this. A lot of this swallowing up of
the enterprises has been done by breaking down these companies for example with
over-regulation, control factor imput markets, market manipulation, union strikes, and
other means, but most of all by credit monopoly, rather than by producing better
products in fair competition. But you need to understand that people have to eat and
provide for themselves in this slave situation and unions, even when not secretly under
the control of the X Element are powerless without the public behind them. . Of course,
now what you see is the decline of the unions-they no longer protect the laborers
because they have done the X Elements' work for them and most of them are controlled by
the X Element anyway. All of this is caused by the weapon of the X-Element-money-the
medium of exchange. There is an imbalace between what laborers are paid in the medium
of exchange to produce and distribute life's necessities and simple pleasures for
themselves and what they are required to pay for them due to the overhang of the
companies or owners. So you see the X Element otherwise known as the international
financial powers get us poor non-X Element either way. The technology and resources
exist for laborers and everybody else to live very well and have lots of leisure and
good things -- it is the way the financial system is set up by the X Element that
prevents this from happening. We either have to borrow and give them money and interest
that way-both companies and laborers or they destroy the companies they do not control
through wars, revolutions, inflation, dollar crises, and the like. Now do you get the

Who really creates the loan when you "borrow" from a bank?

All this talk about Subprime Mortgage Banks and Lenders having a bad day may make for
great Hollywood playwright material, but the fact is borrowers are unable to make
payments on loans that never really existed in the first place, or in fact, on loans
that the borrower actually made through the bank to himself.

Banks lend nothing but pens with which to sign promissory notes. Did you think they
lent peoples savings that were in kept in their vaults? I marvel at this shell game of
the banking system, making any (other) crime in history pale in comparision; causing
great addiction to its wares, with not one in a million ever feeling the needle's first
pierce. The banking system has evolved into wealth harvesting device of an occupying
power, whereby the assets of the many are brought under direct control of the organized
ruling few.

The Great Banking Deception by Tom Schauf (a "digest" revision by E. Lane -- not
for circulation)

Did you really get a loan when you contracted to borrow money from the bank to pay for
your home? Or was it just an exchange (your note for cash), but the bank called it a
loan? Or did two loans occur?

Have you been cheated?

In order for any contract to be valid, there must be 'full disclosure', 'good faith',
'valuable consideration', and 'clean hands'. Here is what the banks advertise: "Come to
our bank. We have money to loan you". Is this really what happens?

When you entered into a loan contract with a bank, you signed a note or contract
promising to pay the bank back, and you agreed to provide collateral that the bank could
seize if you did not repay the loan. Did you really get a loan when you contracted to
borrow money from the bank to pay for your home? Or was it just an exchange (your note
for cash), but the bank called it a loan? Or did two loans occur?

If the American people are drowning in debt, where is your home loan coming from.
Bankers want you to believe that depositors deposit money at banks, banks lend the money
to borrowers and the borrowers repay the money and the money is returned to the
depositors who funded the loan. The fact is the banking system creates the new money
when contract to borrow and your promisary note -- your loan to them! -- is merely
their permission slip to do so. In reality money is anything that can be sold for cash
and that the banks accept as money. Legal tender- cash- money is only one kind of
money. Your promissory note -- your mortgage -- is another. The loan agreement you
sign is sold to investors wanting interest. It circulates, it buys, it exchanges, wether
you call it a money substitute or money itself -- in function it is money.

The loan agreement you sign is sold to investors wanting interest. If you do not pay the
interest, they foreclose and collect the money. The loan agreement can be sold for cash
and the bankers use the loan like non-legal tender money. So what is really happening?
If you exchange your own $100 of cash for a $100 check from the bank -- the bankers
acted like a moneychanger and lent you none of the bank's money.

If the bank uses your $100,000 collateralized loan repayment agreement like money to
fund the checking deposit they create for you, like your own cash deposit funds your
check account, the banker acted like a moneychanger without the bank using or risking
one cent of their money to purchase your loan agreement, aside from their transactions
costs and a use of their system.

The banker got your loan agreement -- money to him -- for free. You created the new
money yourself when you signed the promissory note. The banker, upon receiving and
approving the note then simply created $100,000 as a new deposit. Would you agree to
have the banker steal your $100,000 loan agreement and use it to create $100,000 of new
money -- which he could not create without it -- and return the value of the stolen
property to you as a loan? Do you see that the bank has not made a loan but simply
performed a system transaction upon the loan you gave the bank? You provided the
"money" note the bank will quickly sell to the securitized mortgages market while
simply creating at no expense to itself the $100,000 of new money from the banking
systems monopoly of credit.

Unfortunately the true nature of this process is never fully disclosed in court.
Nevertheless the bookkeeping entries prove that the borrower's loan agreement funded
the loan to the borrower. The bookkeeping entries prove that the banker merely acted
like as a middleman, a moneychanger, exchanging one kind of currency (the promissory
note you created for them) for another kind of currency and charging you as if there
were a loan. You funded the loan yourself. The banker did not make a loan, here merely
conducted some transactions on the loan that you made him while then creating new debt
money that he did not have before from the credit power of the system. When bankers
create new money and lends it to you, you must work for the banker for free to repay the
loan or he forecloses and gets your home for free.

The banker says, repay the loan because the bank lent you money. But shouldn't the one
who really funded the loan be repaid the money? The borrower creates a promissory note
which the banker uses as money to buy other forms of money. The banker then types on a
keyboard and creates the new "deposit" -- the money creation power of the credit
monopoly -- to pay the seller of the house you are buying or for your own use if your
note was a second mortgage.


The Substance - the true transaction - shows that the borrower was the lender to the
bank. Then the bank repaid the loan from the borrower to the bank. The form - the
alleged bank loan agreement - shows the opposite. The substance is the money trail -
the bookkeeping entries. The substance shows that there were two loans exchanged -
equal value for equal value. The borrower was required to repay his loan to the bank
plus interest, but the bank never repaid the debt it owes to you.

In a normal court foreclosure, the lender does not come to court to give testimony. The
bank attorney uses the alleged promissory note with the alleged borrower's signature as
the witness in court to claim that there is an agreement, that there was a loan, that
the lender fulfilled his agreement, and that the alleged borrower did not fulfill the
agreement to repay the money.

Before an attorney can sue for foreclosure, he must show that the defending party (you)
breached the agreement. The attorney needs a witness to give testimony that there is an
agreement and that the agreement has been breached. If Rich (as an example) testifies
in court that there was a loan when he knew that there was only an exchange of equal
value, Rich would be giving false testimony and would be called a false witness.
Instead of the attorney using Rich to give oral testimony, the attorney used the
promissory note as the witness as the evidence to sue the alleged borrower.

There is a legal concept of form vs. substance. The form is the promissory note, which
says that the lender lent money to the alleged borrower. But what is actually happening
and what is said to be happening can be two different things. Example: You sign a
paper that says you were lent $10,000 -- the Form -- but in SUBSTANCE a theif stole
$10,000 worth of diamonds from you, converted them to cash and handed over the cash
getting your promissory note in exchange. In this case no one actually lent you one cent
to obtain the promissory note. The thief stole $10,000 worth of your diamonds and
returned the cash to you as a loan. The form says that there was a loan; your signature
also says that there was a loan. The true transaction, though, proves that there was no
loan. The substance-money trail and the bookkeeping entries-proves that someone took
something of value worth $10,000 from you, exchanged it for a different asset of equal
value and returned your $10,000 to you as a loan that you now have to pay off with
interest. The attorney sues you, claiming that your signature proves that you received
the loan. You hire an expert witness to prove that there was no loan, that the substance
of the transaction was an exchange, and that you were charged as if it were a loan.

Economically speaking, what is the difference if a stranger received your $10,000 worth
of diamonds for free, or if he got a $10,000 lien on your property for free, or if he
received $10,000 of your future payroll checks for free? The substance of the
transaction is the transferal of $10,000 of property from you to the stranger for free.
The transfer of wealth is precisely how bankers obtain liens on the nation's homes,
cars, farms, and businesses for free. If a robber were to use a gun to transfer your
wealth, you would place him in prison. If a banker does the same thing by using "form,"
an attorney, a judge, and a sheriff, you think it is legal.

It's the substance, not the form that counts. Does the attorney use the promissory note
just like a witness to give false testimony in court, claiming that the lender lent
money, cash or cash equivalent to the alleged borrower? The attorney could be disbarred
for bringing fraud into the court. The substance was an exchange of value for value. If
the form and the substance disagree, one must rely on the substance over the form
because substance always wins over form.

Example: You give Rich $100 for five boxes of toys. Rich says, "Here are the five boxes.
Sign this paper that says you received the boxes." You sign. Rich refuses to hand over
the five boxes and claims that the form - the paper you just signed - says that you
received the boxes. You would tell the judge that you acted in good faith by signing
because you were told that you would receive the five boxes standing in front of you.
After you had signed, Rich refused to let you have the boxes. The form - the paper-says
that you received the boxes, but the substance - the true transaction-clearly shows you
never received what you had bargained for. If the attorney uses the form (paper) in
court to claim that you received the boxes when, in fact, he knew that you had never
received then, the attorney brought fraud on the court to sue you. The form - the paper
- would be a false witness against you.

Is the promissory note used as a false witness? The promissory note has the borrower's
signature agreeing that the lender lent the borrower money.

The attorney wants only the form - the promissory note with your signature- as a witness
in court. You want the true substance - the true transaction - and the whole truth and
nothing but the truth. Some attorney’s object to allowing the bookkeeping entries
entered into court as evidence. The attorney must rely on the form and stop the

Extortion occurs when the court does not allow information into court for one's defense.

Few people disagree that the one who provided the original funds to fund the bank loan
check should be repaid the money. Few argue that we should have equal protection and
full disclosure. The lender concealed the true substance in the agreement.

If the bank received $10,000 from Joe and lent the same $10,000 to Joe, shouldn't the
bank return the $10,000 to Joe?

If a banker received $10,000 of capital from Joe and deposits the funds into a checking
account, should the bank return the $10,000 to Joe? If all bankers agree that the answer
is "yes," then all bank loans in America should be canceled tomorrow.

If the bank received $10,000 from Joe and lent the same $10,000 to Joe, should the bank
return the $10,000 to Joe? The foreclosure attorney must argue that the bank should not
return the $10,000 to Joe. Joe believed that the alleged borrower should repay the
lender, and the lender should repay the one who funded the bank loan check. The
foreclosure attorney must argue that the parties agreed to the terms and the one who
funded the loan should never be repaid the money. How could the judge rule in favor of
the bank, claiming that the one who funded the loan should never be repaid the money?

Want proof that this is real? Ask yourself the following questions:

1. Were you told that the Federal Reserve Policies and Procedures and the Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) requirements imposed upon all Federally-insured
(FDIC) banks in Title 12 of the United States Code, section 1831n (a), prohibit them
from lending their own money from their own assets, or from other depositors? Did the
bank tell you where the money for the loan was coming from?

2. Were you told that the contract you signed (your promissory note) was going to be
converted into a 'negotiable instrument' by the bank and become an asset on the bank's
accounting books? Did the bank tell you that your signature on that note made it
'money', according to the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), sections 1-201(24) and 3-104?

3. Were you told that your promissory note (money) would be taken, recorded as an asset
of the bank, and be sold by the bank for cash - without 'valuable consideration' given
to obtain your note? Did the bank give you a deposit slip as a receipt for the money you
gave them, just as the bank would normally provide when you make a deposit to the bank?

4. Were you told that the bank would create an account at the bank that would contain
this money that you gave them?

5. Were you told that a check from this account would be issued with your signature, and
that this account would be the source of the funds behind the check that was given to
you as a "loan"?

If you answered "No" to any of these questions, YOU HAVE BEEN CHEATED! How does that
make you feel? It is now up to you to demand your deposit back and to challenge the
validity of your "signature" on any alleged bank "loan" agreement or check. Since the
banks and other lending institutions cannot allow "full disclosure" of your "loan"
agreement and cannot answer your challenges about it, their silence is your key, along
with important steps that we can show you step-by-step, to get your deposit back and
"payoff" their alleged "loan" to you.


Eustace Mullins summarizes the true situation: "IRS is actually a private collection
agency for the Federal Reserve System." It is not listed among any of the de jure
services or bureaus that constitute the U.S. Department of the Treasury. See Title 31
of the U.S. Code for proof http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/31/ ... particularly
the "organization" of that Department and the section authorizing the "Treasury of the
United States". See also: http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm Also, IRC
7809 requires that all taxes collected by the IRS shall be deposited daily into the
Treasury of the United States: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/7809.html

The IRS is not making those deposits, it is not complying with that clear statutory
requirement, ... and, their failure to do so was the main justification for this
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/erath/injunction.htm (PAST DUE) ... collections of
whatever nature received or collected by authority of any internal revenue law, shall
be paid daily into the Treasury of the United States under instructions of the Secretary
as internal revenue collections, by the officer or employee receiving or collecting the
same, without any abatement or deduction on account of salary, compensation, fees,
costs, charges, expenses, or claims of any description.

Although listed as part of the Treasury Department, the IRS is actually a private
collection agency for the Federal Reserve System. It originated as the Black Hand in
mediaeval Italy, collectors of debt by force and extortion for the ruling Italian mob
families. All personal income taxes collected by the IRS are required by law to be
deposite in the nearest Federal Reserve Bank, under Sec. 15 of the Federal Reserve Act,
"The moneys held in the general fund of the Treasury may be ... deposited in Federal
reserve banks, which banks, when required by the Secretary of the Treasury, shall act
as fiscal agents of the United States."

The bankers have been ingenius the bankers in creating this system. Congress, the
President, judges, laywers and CPAs serve this system and in return profit from it. A
continuous advertizing blitz and suppression of counter-information in all all major
media keep the system an insiders secret.

Henry Ford,Founder of Ford Motor Company, understood the system: "It is well enough
that the people of this nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if
they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning".

This secret banking allows bankers to create economic booms and busts, makes the stock
market go up and down as they increase and decrease the money supply therough their
monopoly of credit. You lose in investments as those who understand the secret
transfer your investment money into their pocket. You lose, they win.

*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only *** CAVEAT LECTOR

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes.

NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet Browser.

Please check http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr

http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2 more real news posts
and support the truth! (sorry but don't have time to email all posts)

free book download



*** Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only. ***
Welcome to Real News Edited excerpts, non-partisan, pro-truth-honesty-peace, and
anti-war-lies-crime. The purpose is to expose corruptions, frauds, deceptions, lies,
criminal plans, cover-ups and free-speech silencing by powerful people in governments,
foundations, corporations and media, which are done using the name of democracy, human
rights, false interpretations of religions, cults, occults, patriotism, economy,
business, media, elections, justice, charity, etc., and are used to trick the public
into hatred & wars and out of their lives, money and freedoms, while the propaganda we
are subjected to makes us believe that we have evolved to where such things cannot
happen [remember slavery, apartheid…]. Please share what you learn with others who do
not have access to the internet. This is only a tip of the iceberg. Stop the hatred that
is used to promote the dehumanization of the victims of predatory aggressions;spread the
truth;free your mind from being a Zioncon occupied territory of the neo-feudal lords by
rejecting the mainstream news propaganda. Caution: real news may induce a kind of
schizophrenia because it provides a true vision of reality which is so different from
the one we are presented by the mass media spins. Latest real infonews available at
alternate news. ***** Check whatreallyhappened . com & other alternative news sites for
latest news flashes. In Truth We Trust! The opinions expressed herein contain positions
and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of the recipient, disseminator or others
mentioned in the information. These are offered as a means to stimulate dialogue and

NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may
have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any
judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection.......... IF
anyone other than the addressee of this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of
the 1st & 4th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R.
1955 Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody & satire
& are all intended for entertainment and amusement only.




Anonymous Quentin said...

It cannot have effect in reality, that is what I consider.
banner advertising | newport Oregon weather | movie ticket prices

23 November 2011 at 04:17  
Blogger loan offer said...

Hi, My name is Mr Henry. I am a private lender who give out loan to private and corporate individuals. Have you been turned down by so many banks? Do you need finance to establish your business? Do you need finance for the expansion of you business? Or do you need a personal loan? My loan ranges from personal to business loan. My interest rate is very affordable and our loan process is very fast as well. I am very willing to make all your financial troubles a thing of the past. If you are really ready to get your financial problems solved,Then search no further and apply for a loan today. If you are interested fill the DATA FORM so that i can give you my terms and conditions.
email: henryloanscompany@yahoo.com
1)YOUR NAME..........
2)YOUR COUNTRY..........
5)PHONE NUMBER..........
6)MONTHLY INCOME..........
9)LOAN REQUEST..........
11)LOAN DURATION..........
My email address is stated below: I look forward to doing business with
Mr Henry
Reply Email:henryloanscompany@yahoo.com

2 November 2015 at 14:40  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home