Human-Deficient Brzezinski Exposed for 9/11 Culpability
Human-Deficient Brzezinski Exposed for 9/11 Culpability
Security Attempts to Seize Activist's Video Tape and Intimidate Free Speech During Oration by
'Grand' Architect and Trilateral Player Serving Agenda of Would-Be Global Landlords
We Are Change activist and 9/11 Truther Luke Rudkowski narrowly escaped from literal goons overseeing a Zbigniew Brzezinski speaking engagement. The brute force now closely guarding the establishment objected, it seems, to the unmasking question aimed at the former member of the Carter Administration, who was selected for public service-- along with the majority of that administration-- from the more private, but no less influential Trilateral Commission, founded by David Rockefeller.
Security not only tried to silence and remove the critical activist, it attempted to confiscate his video tape of the encounter by force, cornering Rudkowski into the position of running for escape after announcing that "9/11 was an inside job" and "national sovereignty will prevail" during his escorted departure.
Click HERE for Google Video
Luke's limited opportunity to put forward a question to Brzezinski was wisely used in a quick, but articulate and carefully worded message that seeks to set-aside Brzezinski's layers of faux-legitimacy and address actual, relevant issues which actually affecting the real world-- peeling off deceptive and charming rhetoric in which the punch-drunk crowd readily indulged:
"Earlier on in this year, you gave a speech to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee where you alluded to the fact that the Bush Administration may stage a terrorist attack to justify a military action against Iran. And then in your book, you also addressed the fact that a memo where Bush and Blair discussed painting a U2 spy plane in U.N. colors so Saddam would shoot it down."
"Although you have argued that deceptions to the American public may be necessary in order to deal with these enemies, how are we to know how many other terrorist attacks have been state-sponsored false flag incidents including the largest one-- the attacks of 9/11?"
"How do we know, how do the American people know that 9/11 wasn't staged, wasn't engineered by you, David Rockefeller, the Trilateral Commission, the C.F.R. (crowd begins to boo, hiss and react) and Bilderberg Group, sir?"
"It's a question. Answer my question. You sponsored al Qaida, sir. You are a criminal. You sponsored al Qaida. In 1979, you gave them money. That's true. You are C.F.R. scum. You are C.F.R. and New World Order scum. You and David Rockefeller will never have a New World Order. National sovereignty will prevail."
As the question was quashed, the crowd cheered at Brzezinski's insistence that Rudkowski "sit down and shut up." The crowd yells back to Luke "You are scum."
The New York based group We Are Change has had its share of challenges to the right of free speech and has had to fight for the rights of alternate media, which is largely internet-based and thus often appears less legitimate than establishment-cosy mainstream media. Recently the group was harassed by police outside ABC Studios during a peaceful demonstration of support for Rosie's public assertion of 9/11 Truth.
During another demonstration in front of the new Building 7, police confiscate the group's camera and literally accuse them of being "terrorists." SEE VIDEO BELOW
Here, Luke asserted that he "has every right" to security over challenges that his rights to free speech and existence as media are somehow invalid.
Rudkowski's attempt to bring accountability to Brzezinski's doorstep is not the vain act of demanding attention from notable civil servants, nor the pursuit of some mere messenger in New World Order false-flag terror. Brzezinski's penchant for designs of world architecture and provocateured re-mapping is well documented, primarily by the thoroughly-articulated visions of American primacy and geopolitical dominance penned by his own hand. He is a key tactician in the globalist system and his strategy is clearly laid out in his book, The Grand Chessboard.
His role in 9/11 itself is not directly established, yet statements of cold strategy reveal his callous attitude towards the worth of human life and its relevant price towards geostrategic goals:
"The attitude of the American public toward the external projection of American power has been much more ambivalent. The public supported America's engagement in World War II largely because of the shock effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor." (The Grand Chessboard pp 24-5)
"The pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-being." (The Grand Chessboard p. 35)
"Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat." (The Grand Chessboard p. 211)
That crafted policy-- dating to 1997-- was echoed only three years later by the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), a think tank highly influential in the formation and focus of the Bush Administration's foreign policy.
The PNAC policy paper Rebuilding America's Defense mapped out a plan for American primacy and suggested-- spinning Brzezinski's notion of a "sudden threat" causing a "shock effect" like Pearl Harbor to foster support into an idea of their own:
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor."
The hypothetical strategy for cultivating American power out of human sacrifice and a "widely-perceived direct external threat" was conveniently picked up by the Council on Foreign Relations, of which Brzezinski has been a long-time member, just three days after the 9/11 attacks:
"There is a chance for the President of the United States to use the disaster . . . to carry out what his father - a phrase his father used I think only once, and it hasn't been used since - and that is a New World Order."
- Senator Gary Hart at the Council on Foreign Relations, September 14, 2001
While the PNAC doctrine was clearly instrumental in the approach to an Iraqi war, Brzezinski's idea goes further, not simply seeking a war for profit, but to craft an entire cultural pre disposal towards world dominance led by a completely hegemonic and imperial America-- making the case for America as the "first and last truly global superpower."
"In brief, for the United States, Eurasian geostrategy involves the purposeful management of geostrategically dynamic states and the careful handling of geopolitically catalytic states, in keeping with the twin interests of America in the short-term: preservation of its unique global power and in the long-run transformation of it into increasingly institutionalized global cooperation."
This framework for American hegemony in context of regional and global cooperation is echoed and reinforced in true PROJECT MOCKINGBIRD style by influential academics and political scientists, including the likes of John Ikenberry, Francis Fukyama and Samuel Huntington.
His foreign policy methods have predominated the think tank and intellectual circles that feed politicians in power, with younger foreign policy elites like James B. Steinberg (member of Bilderberg, Trilateral, C.F.R., former Brookings Institute and current Dean at the L.B.J. School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas) waiting to take the lead in mapping out a policy approach aimed at achieving ruthless goals of world control and targeting geostrategic pivots that would spearhead regional cohesion and insure regional influence-- with Iran-control in key focus.
James B. Steinberg, for one, writes justifying "preventive war" with Iran on the agenda's horizon -- selling its efficacy in dealing with even "latent" threats like "terrorism and weapons proliferation" while carrying the legitimacy of policy agreed upon by a United Nations security council, or failing that, at least a "regional organization," or perhaps even a "coalition of like-minded states" which might prevail in relative legitimacy-- revealing that truly sovereign bodies would be reduced to their relevant function and usefulness in justifying an end through any means beneficial.
"Conditional sovereignty is central to a new norm of state responsibility."
"One problem with the Bush doctrine, then, is not that it is overly reliant on preventive force but that it too narrowly conceives of its use."
"The Bush administration got the first step right, and the logic of its arguments builds toward the second. But it has gotten step three wrong. Unilateralism is not the only alternative to the Security Council."
Calling out such treasonous behavior is important in activism, for reasons only beginning with exposure. Willfully provocating war for strategic purposes does not fit within a gray world where the end-justifies the means; it is the regrettable case of unrestrained, elite madmen plotting and executing for world dominance and personnel profit.
Zbigniew Brzezinski doesn't favor war with Iran, but definitely concurs with Iran's strategic preeminence. He hopes diplomacy will be sufficient to facilitate regional dominance, noting the risks war could have in triggering Russia or even China into war over threats to its interests and/or sense of space. He also cites the potential strain on military capabilities. He is, though, clearly intent on influencing Iran to the greatest degree possible, exercising force if it becomes necessary.
"That puts a premium on maneuver and manipulation in order to prevent the emergence of a hostile coalition that could eventually seek to challenge America's primacy..."(Regarding Middle East strategy in The Grand Chessboard p. 198)
Going it the calm route could translate into faster control of more pieces. Brzezinski wants the whole map, not just the short gain cash cows, and won't advocate taking Iran alone at the cost of sacrificing EU-courted Ukraine and Caucasus/ Central Asian prizes, including Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Georgia and Armenia, which he assesses as all potentially vulnerable if Russia stays weak [The Grand Chessboard].
He has stated, in justification for his tactical, financial and organizational founding of the Taliban during the late 70s as a means of sufficiently weakening the Soviet Union:
"Which is more important in world history: The Taliban or the fall of the Soviet Empire? A few over-excited Islamists or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the Cold War?”
The modern-day Machiavelli puts his "grand" scheming above the limitations of legitimate threat response, provocateured threat response and even Steinberg's pseudo-justified "latent" threats-- he's goes right for the spoils themselves as justification.
War actually justified-- publicly-- as war for the sake of world domination and primacy of the American way. A visionary-- past the vain pretense of cause. A man who wants true results. Advanced Hegelian thinking, skipping the gaming steps of problem and reaction-- Zbigniew Brzezinski has a solution.
Zbigniew Brzezinski with Osama bin Laden, 1979
Activist Luke Rudkowski was apt to meet the clear-headed and cynical approach of Brzezinski with well-read and cutting comments dissecting the real agendas guiding the smokescreen force of false-flag attacks and provocateured events that lie at the heart of the true enemy at hand.
It is important to meet as many of our "public servants" with questions about 9/11 Truth and demand their attention and attempt to harness their representative power to turn around the New World Order government-- which is riding away on the robust engine of American economic and military might.
However, it is important to keep focus on the real forces pulling the strings. Brzezinski is something of the helmsman functionary, right hand man to the globalist owners who demand orchestration and control. Rudkowski, a founding member of We Are Change, was also instrumental in organizing protest at the Council on Foreign Relations during the multi-pronged demonstrations on the fifth anniversary of the 9/11 false-flag attack-- seeking to hold responsible not only the functionaries who carried out the state-sponsored attack, but the ideas behind that, and those who shape those ideas.
Rudkowski is not grandstanding, but attacking with precision, when he ends the video with a message: "Yeah, Brzezinski, you got yours." He certainly had it coming.
"This regionalization is in keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan which calls for a gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of one world government. National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept."
--- Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter