]]>position:absolute;

Revelations

"The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world domination by the dissolution of other races...and by the establishment of a world republic in which everywhere the Jews will exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the Children of Israel...will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition..." (Karl Marx in a letter to Baruch Levy, quoted in Review de Paris, June 1, 1928, p. 574)

Monday, 20 December 2004

The Cambodia Controversy

By Michael Albert

Back in June, Anthony Lewis wrote a NYT column about Pol Pot and Cambodia including the assertion: "A few Western intellectuals, notably Prof. Noam Chomsky, refused to believe what was going on in Cambodia. At first, at least, they put the reports of killing down to a conspiratorial effort by American politicians and press to destroy the Cambodian revolution."

As is his style, Lewis's comment appeared with no supporting evidence despite the fact that: (1) There is much documentation that Chomsky endeavored to clarify the truth about events in Cambodia both as relates to Pol Pot's responsibility as well as the (oft-ignored) responsibility of the U.S. And, (2) Chomsky never made any allegations of a "conspiratorial effort by American politicians and press to destroy the Cambodian revolution," much less attributing all reports of terror to it.

Lewis also omitted that the context of Chomsky's broader researches into the events in Cambodia (with co-author Ed Herman) was a comparison of the media coverage of Cambodia and East Timor. Chomsky and Herman argued that mainstream reaction to the two cases supported the principle that (1) the crimes of an official enemy (Cambodia) are outrageous, and should be a focus of U.S. public attention, even when such attention has no plausible way to impact the outcomes, while (2) the comparable crimes of an ally (Indonesia in Timor) that could easily be terminated by withdrawing support, should be obscured as much as possible.

So far, this is just business as usual for Lewis, the Times, and the establishment intelligentsia. However, in the September issue of the Progressive, editor Matthew Rothschild ran an editorial quoting Lewis favorably. Chomsky and Herman, Rothschild tells us, in a 1977 Nation book review "tried to poke holes in books that warned of Khmer Rouge atrocities," "cited repeated discoveries that massacre reports were false," and cited the "extreme unreliability of refugee reports." Chomsky and Herman "were wrong to suggest that Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge may have been 'more similar to France after liberation' than to Germany under the Nazis." And Chomsky and Herman equivocated: "We do not pretend to know where the truth lies amidst these sharply conflicting assessments." I re-read the 1977 Nation book review. It aims to document what is and is not accorded U.S. media visibility, and what is and is not subject to serious standards of scholarship. In the review, Chomsky and Herman don't take a position regarding the scale of crimes in Cambodia per se, instead, debunking much of the rhetoric then rampant by showing that its basis was suspect or, more often, demonstrably false. They take a firm position on what they could reliably argue: the baselessness of much of the analysis at that time, the scale of U.S. involvement, and the behavior of mainstream media regarding both. Chomsky and Herman don't need defending, but the principles in the on-going debate need clarification.

Like Lewis, Rothschild failed to identify passages where Chomsky and Herman "put the reports of killing down to a conspiratorial effort by American politicians and press to destroy the Cambodian revolution," since, of course, no such passages exist. Lewis also wrote that Chomsky and Herman "refused to believe what was going on in Cambodia." But if someone had said Pol Pot killed ten million peasants, Rothschild would not have believed it, nor would Lewis, Chomsky or Herman, or anyone else. One shouldn't believe fabrication, obviously, and the only thing Chomsky and Herman refused to believe were demonstrably false claims about "what was going on in Cambodia." Lewis's artistry is to imply that Chomsky and Herman doubted there were gross atrocities, which is nonsense. Using the same standards, however, Lewis could have charged Chomsky and Herman with having "refused to believe what was going on in Cambodia" during the U.S. assault since they criticized Ponchaud (the author of one of the books reviewed) for multiplying the death toll from U.S. bombing by three. That Lewis didn't make this criticism implements the principle that it is proper to scrupulously challenge exaggerated claims about U.S. crimes, but not those of the enemy.

Rothschild, going further, says Chomsky and Herman "tried to poke holes in books that warned of Khmer Rouge atrocities," implying that they didn't succeed and also that there is something wrong in looking at atrocity reports to evaluate their accuracy. The phrasing also makes it sound as though Chomsky and Herman were nit-picking, rather than demonstrating the utter baselessness of claims then being made.

In the 1977 review, the first of two books criticized, Murder of a Gentle Land, is by John Barron and Anthony Paul who reported that Cambodia was a "gentle land" during the years when, in fact, according to the CIA, 600,000 people were killed by the U.S. war. The first hole Chomsky and Herman tried to poke related to Baron and Paul's assertion that "virtually everybody" saw summary executions as Phnom Penh was evacuated. Baron and Paul's sources were journalists Cazaux and Schanberg, both of whom flatly denied the claim. The second hole Chomsky and Herman tried to poke had to do with the Barron-Paul claim that people "fled to the cities" as a result of the "harsh regimen" of the Communists, not the American bombing (as was, of course, widely known to be the case). Other holes poked included indicating atrocity photographs that were admittedly faked, etc.

The second book in which Chomsky and Herman "tried to poke holes" was Ponchaud's Cambodge Annee Zero. Like Lewis, Rothschild raises no objections to Chomsky and Herman's "poking holes" in Ponchaud's exaggeration of U.S. crimes. That was okay. It would take too much space to run through all the other holes poked, but it isn't necessary, because Ponchaud himself agreed that every question raised was not only apt, but understated, and in Cambodge Annee Zero's American translation all the errors are revised, as documented in Chomsky and Herman's Political Economy of Human Rights (SEP).

Rothschild also says Chomsky and Herman gave short shrift to accounts from Cambodians who fled, failing to add that in this they were paraphrasing Ponchaud and Charles Twining, the State Department's main "Cambodia watcher," recognized by everyone to be the leading analyst of refugee reports. Rothschild was actually saying, therefore, that the two primary investigators of Cambodian refugees at the time gave short shrift to accounts of Cambodians who fled. More, why would it be wrong to treat refugee reports with the care that Twining and Ponchaud recommend?

Rothschild's last charge is that Chomsky and Herman "were wrong to suggest that Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge may have been 'more similar to France after liberation' than to Germany under the Nazis." At the time, however, this was a perfectly reasonable formulation, and consistent with the then expert estimates. Lacouture had earlier claimed that the Khmer Rouge "boasted" of killing two million people by 1976. After Chomsky pointed out to Lacouture in a personal letter that his references to Ponchaud's book were incorrect, Lacouture published "corrections," in which he said that it didn't matter whether the Khmer Rouge had killed thousands or millions. Chomsky and Herman wrote, in turn, that they thought a factor of 100 or 1,000 did matter, noting also that other sources (including the U.S. State Department) were suggesting estimates toward the low end of Lacoutoure's wide range. Chomsky and Herman then stated, in words criticized by Rothschild: "If, indeed, postwar Cambodia is, as [Lacouture] believes, similar to Nazi Germany, then his comment [about the unimportance of the scale of the deaths] is perhaps just, though we may add that he has produced no evidence to support his judgment. But if postwar Cambodia is more similar to France after liberation, where many thousands of people were massacred within a few months under far less rigorous conditions than those left by the American war, then perhaps a rather different judgment is in order. That the latter conclusion may be more nearly correct is suggested by the analyses mentioned earlier....We do not pretend to know where the truth lies amidst these sharply conflicting assessments..." Chomsky and Herman's concern in this review, remember, was to consider how the facts available at the time were filtered through the media's ideological prism to better understand that prism. They had no basis for taking any further stand regarding the history, and didn't (which is what Rothschild calls "equivocating"). By what principles is this behavior wrong?

There is vastly more information available today about events in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge than in 1977, especially since Khmer Rouge rule lasted from 1975 to 1979 and the most respected historiography indicates that the main barbarism was after the review was written. To be sure, we still don't know how many people died of unnatural causes at the hands of the U.S. war and its aftermath or Pol Pot's terror policies. But, in the last few years, some fairly convincing evidence has emerged showing centralized control of Khmer Rouge terror. Suppose Rothschild had offered a quotation showing that Chomsky and Herman doubted centralized control in a 1977 essay, as I believe they did. Would this be a fair criticism? No, because quite obviously nothing learned after 1977 has a logical bearing on how we judge assessments made in 1977. Those assessments can only be judged on the basis of the information available then, which is exactly what Chomsky and Herman were scrupulously evaluating.

The significance of Rothschild's argument transcends Chomsky and Herman. When the U.S. State Department issued its White Paper of 1965 claiming aggression by North Vietnam, I. F. Stone showed that almost all of the enemy soldiers reported as captured had been born in the south. Years later it was purportedly discovered that there was a unit of northern soldiers in the south in 1964, unbeknownst to the U.S government. If so, was Stone therefore an apologist for Hanoi? Neither Z nor the Progressive would have much to publish if we refrained from analyzing the world until all evidence was completely in.

It seems to me that Cambodia debate is peculiar and often confused. (1) Whether Pol Pot was the worst criminal in all history has no bearing on the heinous nature of the U.S. role in the region—save insofar as we consider later periods of U.S. support for Pol Pot, of course. (2) Using Pol Pot's crimes to retroactively justify our invasion of Vietnam or as an argument for our crimes in Central America or U.S. interventions generally, as if U.S intervention has some higher motive, is just another method in the madness of imperialism. (3) The scale of U.S. crimes and the ensuing travail in Cambodia, however immense, does not remove Pol Pot from culpability for his actions. (4) The idea that Pol Pot should be judged in terms of all unnecessary deaths that took place as a result of his policies has merit. The same idea has merit as well, however, regarding responsibility for deaths by starvation and preventable disease in zones of the world the U.S. dominates, such as Central America. (5) The media and scholarly treatment of Pol Pot and the events more broadly, then and since, reveal, as usual, the principles behind mainstream U.S. opinion about international relations, as indicated throughout this article.

What are the important lessons for a periodical to draw from the period and ensuing debates? My answer would be the five points above. Rothschild thinks the important lessons are: "the United States does not commit every evil in the world," "the horrific potential of violent revolutions followed by vanguard dictatorships," "our anti-interventionism and pacificism can blind us to the grossest human-rights violations abroad," and "a renewed sense of caution about issuing pronouncements." While concurring that not all evils stem from the U.S. (does anyone deny this?) and that vanguard dictatorship is horrific (a lesson rather widely held in the West and certainly by Chomsky and Herman), I have to wonder precisely how it is that anti-interventionist and pacifist sentiments "blind us" to human rights violations. Yes, pacifists and anti-interventionists would oppose Washington's mounting a military rescue to save Cambodian lives; but so did just about everyone else, from right to left at every level, not unreasonably, given that U.S. bombing and troops had not notably benefited the Cambodian people up to that point. Is Rothschild saying that the Left should have pushed for a U.S. intervention? When? In 1975? In 1977? Is he saying that intervention should have been advocated on the information then available? That intervention by the U.S. in Indochina would have been to save lives? If not, then his point makes no sense. One can recognize "human rights violations" but feel, rightly, that U.S intervention is not a means to reduce them. In any event, the implication that Chomsky or Herman or the anti-war left, anti-interventionist left, or pacifist left of the period was blind to human rights violations in Indochina is, well, ridiculous.

Finally, regarding Rothschild's call for a "renewed sense of caution about issuing pronouncements," while I think this advice makes little sense applied to what Chomsky and Herman wrote in their 1977 review, given the cautious scholarship they employed, I think the advice makes quite a lot of sense regarding what Rothschild wrote in his September editorial.

http://www.zmag.org/zmag/viewArticle/12659

Labels:

15 Comments:

Anonymous Rolland said...

����� ���� | ����� | �����������

����������� ���� | ����� | ����� �����

����� ���� | ����� ����� | ����� ����

����������� ����� | ����� ���� | ����� ����

28 August 2011 at 07:55  
Blogger 风骚达哥 said...

20151010 junda
michael kors outlet
ugg outlet store
Coach Factory Outlet Private Sale
michael kors handbags
Ugg Boots,Ugg Boots Outlet,Ugg Outlet,Cheap Uggs,Uggs On Sale,Ugg Boots Clearance,Uggs For Women
louis vuitton outlet
Louis Vuitton Bags On Sale
air max 95,nike golf,nike janoski,air max 1,nike canada,nike plus,nike shox,nike factory store
ugg boots
cheap uggs
Coach Factory Outlet Private Sale
ugg boots sale
coach outlet
Louboutin Red Bottoms Shoes Outlet
Christian Louis Vuitton Red Bottoms
Louis Vuitton Bags On Sale
Michael Kors Outlet Sale Clearance
Abercrombie & Fitch Factory Outlet
ugg boots australia
Lebron James Basketball Shoes Sale
coach factory outlet
michael kors bags
ugg boots sale
tory burch outlet
Gucci Outlet Online Sale
michael kors handbag
air max 90
Michael Kors Outlet Online Mall
timberland boots for women
coach outlet online

9 October 2015 at 04:46  
Blogger đỗ đức said...

trông Goldsilk Complex | park view residence | nhận Vinhomes Smart City |
bỏ đi Starcity Center | còn Vinhome Trần Duy Hưng | Giá Vinhomes Liễu Giai | hàng tuần Chung cư 47 Nguyễn Tuân | chi tiết
loại Chung cư 47 Nguyễn Tuân | chia sẻ Ecolife Capitol | đăng ký Starlake Tây Hồ Tây |
đăng ký đi xem Chung cư 360 Giải Phóng | đường Chung cư 282 Nguyễn Huy Tưởng | xem 265 Cầy giấy | Vinhomes Paradise Mễ Trì | Vinhomes Green City | Vinhomes Liễu giai |
toàn diện Chung cư Hà nội | Vinhomes Trần Duy Hưng | Chung cư 233b Nguyễn Trãi | Chung cư Ecolife Capitol | chung cư Sun City Nguyễn Trãi | chung cư 47 Nguyễn Tuân | Ecolife Capitol | chung cư Legend Tower |
các mẫu Chung cư Hà Nội | The Manor Central Park | Chung cư CT3 Nghĩa Đô | Starlake Tây Hồ Tây/ | Chung cư 378 Minh Khai | Chung cư 132 Nguyễn Trãi | Chung cư 493 Trương Định | Chung cư Udic Riverside |
mới tinh Chung cư 360 Giải Phóng

17 November 2015 at 04:13  
Blogger đỗ đức said...

be bé Chung cư 282 Nguyễn Huy Tưởng | Vinhomes Garden City Cầu Diễn| Chung cư Artemis Số 3 Lê Trọng Tấn | Vinhomes Lakeside Park | Chung cư Hacinco Complex > | Chung cư Aqua Spring cầm đền The Garden Hill | Paragon Tower | chăm Vinhomes Mễ Trì | lo Vinhomes Garden City | cho Chung cư The Vesta | tất Modern Interior | cả Chung cư 16 Láng Hạ | Park Hill Premium | Vinhomes Liễu Giai | Chung cư Modern Interior | Chung cư Times Tower | Chung cư 16 Láng Hạ | Chung cư 69b Thụy Khuê | Vinhomes Garden City Cầu Diễn | Chung cư 379 Đội Cấn | Vinhomes Phạm Hùng | thông tin mới Chung cư 99 Trần Bình | nhà mới Chung cư HaTay Millennium | Hồ Gươm Plaza | Chung cư Paragon Tower | New Hội An City | đất mới Chung cư 69 Vũ Trọng Phụng |

17 November 2015 at 04:14  
Blogger đỗ đức said...

Tranh đồng | nhìn thấy Đồ Đồng Cổ | Đồ Đồng Đại Bái | các dạng Mật ong nguyên chất | Bán nhanh Đồ Thờ Bằng Đồng | ứng ý Đồng Đồng Mỹ Nghệ | Đồ Đồng Phong Thủy | Đồ Đồng Mỹ Nghệ | Tranh Đồng | Đồ Đồng Mỹ Nghệ | Đồ Đồng Phong Thủy | Tranh Đồng | | Mật Ong Nguyên Chất |

17 November 2015 at 04:14  
Blogger Gege Dai said...

20151203xiaodaige
ugg boots
air jordan 11
tory burch outlet online
nfl jerseys
ugg boots uk
ed hardy clothing
supra shoes
ugg clearance
hollister clothing
moncler outlet
ray-ban sunglasses
mulberry outlet store
air jordan shoes for sale
rolex watches,rolex watches,swiss watches,watches for men,watches for women,omega watches,replica watches,rolex watches for sale,rolex replica,rolex watch,cartier watches,rolex submariner,fake rolex,rolex replica watches,replica rolex
air max 90
rolex watches outlet
michael kors outlet
louis vuitton,borse louis vuitton,louis vuitton sito ufficiale,louis vuitton outlet
discount oakley sunglasses
michael kors outlet
ralph lauren uk
converse shoes
kobe 9
cyber monday 2015
barbour jackets
mcm backpack
lacoste pas cher
hermes belt for sale
michael kors canada
canada goose outlet
fitflops sale
mac cosmetics
chanel handbags outlet
ray ban outlet
tods shoes
mulberry uk

4 December 2015 at 01:35  
Blogger 03 Yang said...

shijun
cheap ray ban sunglasses
wellensteyn jackets
ugg outlet
canada goose outlet
winter coats
canada goose outlet
barbour coats
ugg boots
canada goose jackets
black friday deals
discount ugg boots
canada goose jackets
black friday 2015
coach outlet store
ugg sale
winter jackets
snow boots
cyber monday deals
barbour coats
ray ban sunglasses
swarovski outlet
ugg boots
canada goose jackets
moncler jackets
belstaff jackets
canada goose jackets
cheap ugg boots
michael kors factory outlet
ugg australia
woolrich outlet
nobis outlet
ugg outlet
parajumpers coats
moncler outlet
cyber monday 2015
ugg outlet

11 December 2015 at 22:02  
Blogger Hua Cai said...

kate spade handbags
cheap uggs
tiffany jewelry
longchamp handbags
toms shoes
kate spade uk
chanel handbags
toms shoes
rolex watches
cheap nfl jerseys
cheap uggs
uggs outlet
tiffany and co
oakley sunglasses wholesale
beats headphones
nike huarache
cheap mlb jerseys
oakley sunglasses
wedding dresses
fitflops sale
michael kors outlet
true religion outlet
polo ralph lauren
chanel outlet
cheap snapbacks
ray ban sunglasses
ugg boots
adidas outlet store
michael kors uk
oakley sunglasses
air jordan shoes
michael kors clearance
ferragamo shoes
ray ban sunglasses
swarovski jewelry
michael kors sale
coach outlet
ugg uk
louis vuitton outlet
tory burch outlet
20151215caihuali

14 December 2015 at 17:29  
Blogger Minko Chen said...

marc jacobs
roshe run men
abercrombie and fitch
coach outlet online
louis vuitton,borse louis vuitton,louis vuitton sito ufficiale,louis vuitton outlet
ralph lauren outlet
replica watches
ralph lauren outlet
true religion jeans
mulberry outlet,mulberry handbags outlet
nhl jerseys
coach outlet
michael kors online outlet
louis vuitton outlet store
lululemon pants
oakley,occhiali oakley,oakley italia,oakley occhiali,oakley sunglasses
true religion outlet
kate spade uk
cheap jordan shoes
soccer jerseys wholesale

5 January 2016 at 22:03  
Blogger Hảo Tạ said...

chung cư Imperial Plaza 360 Giải Phóng|chung cư Imperial Plaza|chung cu Imperial Plaza|Imperial Plaza 360 Giải Phóng
|chung cư the legend|chung cư the legend 109 nguyễn tuân|chung cư eco green city|chung cư eco green city nguyễn xiển|The manor central park nguyễn xiển |chung cư udic riverside 122 vĩnh tuy|chung cư Valencia garden|chung cu Valencia garden
|chung cư Valencia garden Long biên|chung cư HBI Long Biên|chung cư vinata tower|chung cư vinata tower 289 khuất duy tiến|chung cu vinata tower|chung cu vinata tower 289 khuat duy tien|chung cư 289 khuất duy tiến|chung cu 289 khuat duy tien|chung cu 82 nguyen tuan|chung cư 82 nguyễn tuân|chung cư 69 vũ trọng phụng|chung cu 69 vu trong phung|bất động sản miền bắc|chung cư hà nội|chung cư eco green nguyễn xiển|eco green city|chung cu eco green city|chung cu eco green city nguyen xien

11 February 2016 at 03:22  
Blogger Gege Dai said...

04011wangjuan
omega outlet
nike air max 90
ray ban sunglasses
longchamp solde
toms shoes
polo ralph lauren
cheap nba jerseys
ray-ban sunglasses
coach outlet
rolex watches
true religion sale
tory burch outlet
polo ralph lauren
true religion outlet uk
true religion outlet
ray-ban sunglasses
replica watches
rolex outlet
ralph lauren outlet
fitflops clearance
ray-ban sunglasses
lacoste pas cher
birkenstock sandals
ferragamo shoes
mulberry bags
ralph lauren outlet
longchamp pliage
tiffany outlet
coach outlet store
coach outlet

10 April 2016 at 23:57  
Blogger Qúy Lê Xuân said...

http://chungcuimperiaskygarden.vn/
Imperia Sky Garden
Chung cư Imperia Sky Garden
Chung cư Imperia Sky Garden 423 Minh Khai
Bán chung cư Imperia Sky Garden
Imperia 423 Minh Khai
Imperia Sky Garden Minh Khai
Dự án Imperia Sky Garden
Dự án Imperia Sky Garden 423 Minh Khai
Dự án chung cư Imperia Sky Garden
http://imperiaskygardens.com/
Imperia Sky Garden
chung cư Imperia Sky Garden Minh Khai
Imperia Minh Khai
Imperia Garden Minh Khai
Imperia Sky Garden 423 Minh Khai
Dự án Imperia Sky Garden 423 Minh Khai
Dự án chung cư Imperia Sky Garden
http://chungcuimperiaskygarden.com.vn/
Imperia Sky Garden
Chung cư Imperia Sky Garden Minh Khai
Imperia Garden 423 Minh Khai
Imperia Sky Garden Minh Khai
Dự án Imperia Sky Garden
Dự án chung cư Imperia Sky Garden

20 May 2016 at 01:17  
Blogger Phòng dự án- Huy Đạt said...

Chung cư Vinhomes Metropolis
Vinhomes Metropolis
Park Hill Premium
Biệt thự Green Pearl 378 Minh Khai
Chung cư Vinhomes Gardenia
Chung cư Minh Khai City Plaza
Chung cư 108 Nguyễn Trãi
Chung cư Booyoung
Chung cư Vinata Tower
Chung cư E4 Yên Hòa
Chung cư Vinhomes Golden River
Chung cư Vinhomes Mễ Trì
Chung cư Minh Khai City Plaza












Chung cu Vinhomes Metropolis
Vinhomes Metropolis
Park Hill Premium
Biet thu Green Pearl 378 Minh Khai
Chung cu Vinhomes Gardenia
Chung cu Minh Khai City Plaza
Chung cu 108 Nguyễn Trãi
Chung cu Booyoung
Chung cu Vinata Tower
Chung cu E4 Yên Hòa
Chung cu Vinhomes Golden River
Chung cu Vinhomes Mễ Trì
Chung cu Minh Khai City Plaza





22 May 2016 at 00:53  
Blogger xjd7410@gmail.com said...

20161102 junda
hermes outlet
michael kors handbags
michael kors outlet store
canada goose jackets
ray ban sunglasses
cazal sunglasses
rolex watches
oakley sunglasses
soccer jerseys
abercrombie and fitch
lebron james shoes
supra shoes
hermes belt
bottega veneta outlet
dior sunglasses
nike free 5
celine outlet
michael kors outlet clearance
adidas wings
ugg sale
michael kors outlet
michael kors handbags
tory burch outlet
oakley sunglasses
ugg boots
uggs outlet
michael kors handbags
michael kors factory outlet
ralph lauren polo
fitflops sale
true religion jeans
nike air force 1
nike roshe
longchamp solde
ralph lauren polo

1 November 2016 at 23:00  
Blogger Gege Dai said...

true religion uk
tiffany jewellery
louis vuitton neverfull
michael kors handbags
louis vuitton sunglasses
reebok outlet store
mcm outlet
canada goose jackets
tiffany and co jewelry
ferragamo outlet
20161124lck

23 November 2016 at 17:38  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

myself@london.com