"The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world domination by the dissolution of other races...and by the establishment of a world republic in which everywhere the Jews will exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the Children of Israel...will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition..." (Karl Marx in a letter to Baruch Levy, quoted in Review de Paris, June 1, 1928, p. 574)

Friday, 21 May 2004

The 'Problem of the Gas Chambers'

by Robert Faurisson

The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence …— Article 19 of the Statutes of the International Military Tribunal

(in reality: the Inter-allied Military Tribunal) at Nuremberg

The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge, but shall take judicial notice thereof …— Article 21 of the Statutes

No one, not even those individuals who regard the Third Reich with nostalgia, denies the existence of concentration camps under Hitler. Everyone also recognizes that certain camps were equipped with crematory ovens: instead of being buried, the corpses were reduced to ashes. The repeated occurrence of epidemics made cremation necessary, especially for those who had died of typhus (see the photos of mass graves at Belsen et cetera). What is disputed by numerous French, British, American, and German authors is the existence of "extermination camps." This expression is used by historiographers to refer to those camps that were supposed to have been equipped with "gas chambers." Allegedly, these "gas chambers" were different from American gas chambers in that they were used to kill hundreds of men, women, and children at a time. Because the victims were chosen because of their race or religion, this is referred to as "genocide." The poison employed in this "genocide" is said to have been Zyklon B (a pesticide based upon prussic or hydrocyanic acid).

Those who contest the "genocide" claim and the existence of the "gas chambers" are called Revisionists. Their argument runs approximately as follows:

It suffices for both of these problems ("genocide" and "gas chambers") to apply the customary methods of historical criticism, to see that one is confronted here by two myths that are inseparable. The criminal intentions that are attributed to Hitler have never been proven. As far as the weapon for this crime is concerned, no one has actually seen it. Here one is confronted by an extraordinarily successful war and hate propaganda campaign. History is full of frauds of this kind, beginning with their religious fables of sorcery and witchcraft. What distinguishes our times from earlier epochs is the frightening power of the media and the propaganda ad nauseam which is made for what must be called "the hoax of the twentieth century." Let him beware who, after 30 years, gets the idea to expose this hoax. He will learn depending upon the situation through imprisonment, fines, assaults and insults. His career can be shattered or endangered. He will be denounced as a Nazi. Either his thesis will be ignored, or else it will be distorted. No country will be more unrelentingly ruthless toward him than Germany.¹

Today however, the silence is about to be broken about those men who have dared to write responsibly that Hitler's "gas chambers" (including those of Auschwitz and Majdanek) are only a historical lie. That is a great advance.

But what insults and distortions an Exterminationist historian such as Georges Wellers allowed himself when, more than ten years after Paul Rassinier's death, he decided to expose the minutest part of the arguments of this ex-inmate of a concentration camp who had had the courage to reveal the lie of the "gas chambers" in his writings!

The best way in which a historian may inform himself regarding the actual claims of the disciples of Paul Rassinier is to refer to the work of American professor Dr. Arthur R. Butz entitled The Hoax of the Twentieth Century.²

For my part, I take the liberty of making only a few observations specifically for serious research-oriented historians.

I call their attention to a paradox. Although the "gas chambers" are, in the view of the official historians, absolutely central to a picture of the Nazi concentration camp system (and furthermore, as proof for the totally perverse and devilish character of the German concentration camps in comparison to all previous and more recent concentration camps it ought to be meticulously shown how the Nazis proceeded to invent, construct, and operate these fearsome human slaughterhouses), one must be thoroughly astonished that in the impressive bibliography of the concentration camp literature there is not a single book, not a single brochure, not a single article, on the "gas chambers" themselves. One must not be misled by some very promising titles; rather one must ascertain the contents of these writings for oneself. I regard as "official historical writing" those publications which are written about the concentration camps by institutions or foundations that are partly or wholly financed from public funds, such as, for example, in France, the Comité d'Histoire de la Deuxième Guerre Mondiale (Committee for the History of the Second World War) and the Centre de Documentation Juive Contemporaire (Jewish Contemporary Documentation Center), and in Germany (Munich), the Institut für Zeitgeschichte (Institute for Contemporary History).

One must wait until page 541 of the thesis by Olga Wormser-Migot on the system of Nazi concentration camps, before one finds a passage about the "gas chambers." However, for the reader there are still three other surprises:

  1. The passage in question covers only three pages.
  2. It carries the title: "The Problem of the Gas Chambers."
  3. The "problem" consists of trying to determine whether the "gas chambers" at Ravensbrück (Germany) and Mauthausen (Austria) really existed; the author comes to the conclusion that they did not exist; however she does not examine here the "problem" of the "gas chambers" of Auschwitz or any of the other camps, probably because in her mind they do not present a "problem." [on page 157 of her book she says that Auschwitz I had no gas chamber.]

At this point, the reader probably wants to know why an analysis that concludes that "gas chambers" did not exist in certain camps is suddenly discontinued as soon as, for example, Auschwitz is discussed. Why, on one hand, is the critical spirit awakened, and then, on the other hand, is it allowed to collapse into lethargy? After all, as far as the "gas chamber" of Ravensbrück is concerned, we have many points of "evidence" and "undeniable eyewitness accounts," beginning with repeated and extensive eyewitness accounts by Marie-Claude Vaillant-Couturier or Germaine Tillion.

It gets even better. Several years after the war, before both British and French tribunals, the camp officials of Ravensbrück (Suhren, Schwarzhuber and Treite) repeatedly confessed to the existence of a "gas chamber" in their camp. They even vaguely described its operation. Eventually, those who did not commit suicide were executed because of this alleged "gas chamber." The same "confessions" were given prior to their deaths by Ziereis for Mauthausen (Austria) and by Kramer for Struthof-Natzweiler (Alsace).

Today, one can see the alleged "gas chamber" of Struthof-Natzweiler and in the same place one can also read the unbelievable "confession" of Kramer. This "gas chamber," which is designated as an "historical monument," is a complete fraud. The slightest amount of critical spirit will be sufficient to convince oneself that a gassing in this small room, without any sealing whatsoever, would have been a catastrophe for the executioner as well as for the people in the vicinity. In order to make this "gas chamber" (which is guaranteed to be "in its original condition") believable, someone has gone so for as to clumsily knock a hole into the thin wall with a chisel, and thereby break four tiles. The hole was so arranged that Josef Kramer would have dumped through it the mysterious "salts" (about which he could give no further details and which, when mixed with a little water, killed within one minute!). How could salts and water make such a gas? How could Kramer have prevented the gas from coming back out the hole? How could he see his victims from a hole which would have let him see no more than half the room? How did he ventilate the room before opening the rudimentary door, made from rough-cut lumber? Perhaps one must ask the civil engineering firm in Saint-Michel sur-Meurthe (Vosges), which after the war altered the place which today is presented to visitors "in its original condition"?

Even long after the war, prelates, university professors, and some ordinary citizens gave eyewitness descriptions regarding the terrible reality of the "gas chambers" of Buchenwald and Dachau. With regard to Buchenwald, the "gas chamber" gradually disappeared from the minds of the people who had previously maintained that there was one in this camp.


With regard to Dachau, the situation is different. After it had been firmly established for example by His Eminence Bishop Piguet, the bishop of Clermont-Ferrand that the "gas chamber" had been especially useful in gassing Polish priests,3 eventually the following official explanation came to pass:

This gas chamber, whose construction had been started in 1942, was still not completed in 1945 when the camp was liberated. No one could have been gassed in it.

The little room, which visitors are told is a "gas chamber," is in reality completely harmless and, while all sorts of construction plans are available for "Baracke X" (the crematorium and vicinity), one cannot determine upon what basis or technical explanation one can claim that this structure is an "unfinished gas chamber."


No official historical institute has done more than the Institut für Zeitgeschichte in Munich to make the myth of the "gas chambers" believable. Since 1972 its director has been Dr. Martin Broszat. As a member of this Institute since 1955, Dr. Broszat became famous as a result of his (partial!) publication in 1958 of the confessions that Rudolf Höss (former Commandant of Auschwitz) is supposed to have written in a communist prison before he was hanged. However, on 19 August 1960, this historian had to tell his amazed countrymen that there had never been mass gassings in the entire Old Reich (Germany's 1937 frontiers), but rather, only in a small number of selected places, especially in occupied Poland, including Auschwitz and Birkenau but not Majdanek. This startling news was given in a simple letter to the editor which was published in the weekly magazine Die Zeit (19 August 1960, page 16). The title was quite misleading and restrictive: Keine Vergasung in Dachau (No Gassing at Dachau) instead of Keine Massenvergasung im Altreich (No Mass Gassing in the Old Reich).4 In order to support this contention, Dr. Broszat provided not the slightest piece of evidence. Today [1978], eighteen years after his letter, neither he nor any of his colleagues has provided the slightest explanation for this affirmation. It would be highly interesting to learn:

  1. How does Dr. Broszat know that "gas chambers" in the Old Reich were frauds?
  2. How does he know that the "gas chambers" in Poland are genuine?
  3. Why do the "proofs," the "certainties," and the "eyewitness accounts" concerning the concentration camps in the west suddenly have no value, while the "proofs," "certainties," and "eyewitness accounts" concerning the camps in Poland Communist territory still remain true?

As if by some tacit agreement, not a single recognized historian has raised these questions. How often in the "history of history" has one relied upon the claims of a single historian?5

German Camps in Occupied Poland

Let us now examine the "gas chambers" in Poland.

For proof that the "gas chambers" in Belzec or Treblinka really existed, one is asked to rely essentially upon the statement of Kurt Gerstein. This document from a member of the SS, who allegedly committed suicide in 1945 in the prison of Cherche-Midi in Paris, abounds with so many absurdities that in the eyes of historians it has for a long time already been thoroughly discredited.6 Furthermore, this statement has never been made public, not even in the documents of the Nuremberg tribunal, except in an unusable form (with truncations, falsifications, and rewritings). The actual document has never been available with its absurd appendices (French "draft" or the "supplements" in German).

Regarding Majdanek, a visit to the actual site is absolutely necessary. It is even more convincing than a visit to Struthof-Natzweiler, if that is possible. Over this question I will publish additional information.

With regard to Auschwitz and Birkenau, one must rely essentially on the "Memoirs"7 of Rudolf Höss, which were prepared under the supervision of his Polish captors. At the actual site, one can only find a "reconstructed" room (Auschwitz I) and ruins (Auschwitz II or Birkenau).

An execution with gas has nothing to do with a suicidal or accidental suffocation. In the case of an execution, the executioner and his team must not be exposed to the slightest danger. For their executions, the Americans employ hydrocyanic acid in a sophisticated way, and that only in a small, hermetically-sealed chamber. Afterwards, the gas is exhausted from the chamber and neutralized.

For this reason, one must ask how, for example in the case of Auschwitz II or Birkenau, one could bring 2,000 people into a room measuring 210 square meters in area, and then in this highly crowded situation throw in the very strong pesticide Zyklon B, and then immediately after the deaths of the victims let a work crew without any gas masks enter the room in order to take out the bodies which had been thoroughly saturated with cyanide.

Two documents8 from the German industrial archives which were registered by the Americans at Nuremberg tell us that the Zyklon B had a strong tendency to adhere to surfaces and could not be removed from an ordinary room with a strong ventilator, but only by natural aeration for almost 24 hours. Additional documents may be found only at the site in the Auschwitz Museum archives, which were never described elsewhere, but which show that this room of 210 square meters, which is today in a dilapidated condition, was only a very simple mortuary, which (in order to protect it against heat) had been located underground, and which was provided with only a single door which served as both an entrance and an exit.9

Concerning the crematoria of Auschwitz, there is just as there is generally for the entire camp an overabundance of documents and invoices down to the last penny. However, concerning the "gas chambers" there is nothing: no contract for construction, not even a study, nor an order for materials, nor a plan, nor an invoice, nor even a photograph. In a hundred war crimes trials, nothing of the sort was ever produced.


"I was in Auschwitz and I can assure you that there was no 'gas chamber' there." Only seldom does one hear defense witnesses with enough courage to pronounce this statement. They are persecuted in the courts.10 Still today, everyone in Germany takes the risk that, if they give an eyewitness account in favor of Thies Christophersen (who wrote The Auschwitz Lie), they will be punished for '"defaming the memory of the deceased."11

Immediately after the war, the Germans, the International Red Cross and the Vatican (which was otherwise so expert as to whatever happened in Poland), as well as many others, declared in an embarrassed tone: "The 'gas chambers' we knew nothing about them!" Yes but I would put the question this way: "Can one know about things which did not even happen?"

There was not a single "gas chamber" in even one of the German concentration camps; that is the truth. The nonexistence of "gas chambers" should be regarded as welcome news; to hide this news in the future would be an injustice. Just as there is no attack upon a religion if one portrays "Fatima" as a fraud, the announcement that the "gas chambers" are an historical lie is no attack upon concentration camp survivors. One is merely doing one's duty being truthful.


After 30 years of research, revisionist authors have reached the following conclusions:

  1. The Hitler "gas chambers" never existed.
  2. The "genocide" (or "attempted genocide") of the Jews never took place. In other words: Hitler never gave an order nor permission that anyone should be killed because of his race or religion.
  3. The alleged "gas chambers" and the alleged "genocide" are one and the same lie.
  4. This lie, which is largely of Zionist origin, has made an enormous political and financial fraud possible, whose principal beneficiary is the state of Israel.
  5. The principal victims of this fraud are the German people (but not the German rulers) and the entire Palestinian people.
  6. The enormous power of the official information services has, thus far, had the effect of ensuring the success of the lie and of censoring the freedom of expression of those who have denounced the lie.
  7. The participants in this lie know that its days are numbered. They distort the purpose and nature of the Revisionist research. They label as "resurgence of Nazism" or as "falsification of history" what is only a thoughtful and justified concern for historical truth.


Two publications and an official intervention by the author:

  1. A letter to Historama, Paris, November 1975, page 10, on the expression "N.N." Originally, these initials never meant Nacht und Nebel (Night and Fog), but Nomen nescio (Anonymous). ln practice it meant that certain inmates would not be permitted to receive or send mail.
  2. Segments of a letter to Historia, Paris, August 1977, page 132: "The Imposture of Genocide."
  3. On 29 January 1978 at the Colloque National de Lyon sur Eglises et Chrétiens de France dans la Deuxième Guerre Mondiale (National Convention in Lyon on Churches and Christians of France during the Second World War) an intervention concerning the imposture of the "gas chambers" (see Rivarol, Paris, 16 February 1978, page 5).


  1. Regarding the great number of vicious and insulting articles, there is a study by Hermann Langbein which appeared in Le Monde Juif (The Jewish World), April/June 1975. The title is "Coup d'oeil sur la littérature néo-nazie," ("A Glimpse at Neo-Nazi Literature"), pages 8-20. Hermann Langbein was an inmate in Auschwitz. He testified at countless trials. He holds an important position in the circles of former concentration camp inmates. One of his most recent works is entitled: Hommes et Femmes à Auschwitz (Men and Women of Auschwitz), Paris, Fayard, 1975, VIII-529 pages (Translated from Menschen in Auschwitz, Vienna, 1974.) Not one of the 30 chapters, not one of the 268 sections of this book is devoted to the "gas chambers"! Rather, one constantly sees expressions such as "selection for the gas chambers" etc. There is also a study by Georges Wellers which appeared in Le Monde Juif (op. cit.) April/June 1977. The title is "La 'Solution finale', de la question juive et la mythomanie néo-nazie" ("The "Final Solution" and Neo-Nazi Mythomania,"), pages 41-84. There is also a study by Ino Arndt and Wolfgang Scheffler in Viertelsjahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte (Quarterly Review for Contemporary History), which is a publication of the Institute for Contemporary History in Munich. The Institute's director is currently Dr. Martin Broszat. This study was published in the issue of April 1976. The title is: "Organisierter Massenmord an Juden in NS-Vernichtungslagern" (Organized Mass-Murder of Jews in Nazi Extermination Camps), pages 105-135.
  2. The Hoax of the Twentieth Century. Newport Beach, CA: Institute for Historical Review, 1979.
  3. Prison et Déportation (Prison and Deportation). Paris: Spes; 1947; page 77.
  4. Broszat's letter is reproduced in facsimile (with its English translation) in The Journal of Historical Review, May/June 1993, page 12.
  5. The famed Simon Wiesenthal has also admitted that "there were no extermination camps on German soil" in a letter to the editor of Books and Bookmen, page 5, April 1975. Although he later wrote in a letter dated 12 May 1986 to Professor John George of Central State University in Edmond, Oklahoma, that he "could never have said such a thing," Wiesenthal reconfirmed his earlier statement in a letter to the editor published on page 14 of the European editor of Stars and Stripes dated 24 January 1993. This letter is reproduced in facsimile in The Journal for Historical Review, May/June 1993, page 10.
  6. See the opinion expressed by the forensic pathologist as it is reported by the Exterminationist Pierre Joffroy in his book about Kurt Gerstein: L'Espion de Dieu/La Passion de Kurt Gerstein (The Spy of God/The Passion of Kurt Gerstein), Paris, Grasset, 1969, page 262.
  7. Kommandant in Auschwitz/Autobiographische Aufzeichnungen (Commandant of Auschwitz/Autobiographical Memoirs) by Rudolf Höss, Stuttgart, Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1958,184p; introduction and commentary by Dr. Martin Broszat. Concerning "gassing," see pages 126 and 166. The entry of the work crew into the "gas chamber" is supposed to happen "sofort" ("immediately") as it is written on page 166.
  8. These two extensive documents which are of great importance were apparently not used at the trials of Gerhard Peters, former director of Degesch. They were registered as documents NI-9098 and NI-9912. They irrevocably reduce to nothing the "eyewitness testimony" of Höss regarding the "gas chambers."
  9. Photographs Neg. 6228 and following.
  10. Case of Wilhelm Stäglich, for example. See Stäglich in the Index Nominum of Butz's book (op. cit.).
  11. Die Auschwitz-Lüge (The Auschwitz Lie), #23 of Kritik (2341 Kälberhagen, Post Mohrkirch, West Germany), 1974. This booklet was followed by Der Auschwitz-Betrug/Das Echo auf die Auschwitz-Lüge (The Auschwitz Fraud/The Echo of the Auschwitz Lie.).

Editor's note:

This is an expanded version of the original article.

About the author

Dr. Robert Faurisson was born at Shepperton, near London, in 1929, to a French father and a Scottish mother. He was educated in Singapore, Japan, Marseille, and in Paris at the Sorbonne, where he received his doctorate in 1972. After a short spell teaching at the Sorbonne, Professor Faurisson became Associate Professor in French Literature at the University of Lyon-2 in central France. He specializes in the appraisal and evaluation of texts and documents.

Source: The Journal for Historical Review



Blogger Chung cư giá rẻ said...

chung cư goldsilk vạn phúc
chung cư goldsilk complex
goldmark city 136 hồ tùng mậu
chung cu park view residence
bán chung cư dương nội
chung cư imperia nguyễn huy tưởng

8 June 2015 at 03:49  
Blogger Gege Dai said...

baltimore ravens jerseys
new york giants jerseys
philadelphia eagles jerseys
vans outlet
tommy hilfiger uk
air jordan 4
new england patriots jersey
air jordan 11
giuseppe zanotti outlet
jordan 4
los angeles lakers jersey
broncos jerseys
abercrombie and fitch
nike free running
giants jersey
foamposite shoes
air jordan 13
houston texans jersey
atlanta falcons jerseys
ravens jerseys
tods shoes sale
supra shoes
washington redskins jerseys
abercrombie and fitch
houston texans jerseys
steelers jerseys
supra shoes sale
new orleans saints jerseys
indianapolis colts jersey
baltimore ravens jersey
kobe 9
patriots jerseys
titans jersey
cincinnati bengals jerseys
chicago blackhawks jerseys

9 May 2016 at 21:43  
Blogger Dương Phạm said...

Chung cư gamuda
Biệt thự gamuda
Liền kề gamuda

Biệt thự gamuda
Biệt thự đơn lập Gamuda
Biệt thự song lập gamuda
Chung cư gamuda
Liền kề gamda
Biet thu gamuda
Biệt thự Gamuda Gardens
Giá biệt thự gamuda
Biet thu mau Gamuda Gardens
Biệt thự gamuda city
Biệt thự gamuda gardens
Gamuda Garden
Biệt thự gamuda
Biet thu gamuda
Bán biệt thự gamuda
Biệt thự Gamuda Gardens
Giá biệt thự gamuda
Biet thu mau Gamuda Gardens
Biệt thự gamuda city
Biệt thự gamuda gardens
Gamuda Garden
Bán biệt thự đơn lập gamuda
Bán biệt thự đơn lập gamuda
Bán biệt thự đơn lập gamuda
Bán biệt thự song lập gamuda
Biệt thự song lập gamuda
Giá biệt thự song lập gamuda
Chung cư gamuda city the one
Chung cư gamuda city the two
Liền kề gamuda
Lien ke gamuda
Nhà liền kề gamuda
Nhà liền kề gamuda gardens
Liền kề gamuda giai đoạn 2

25 May 2016 at 23:35  
Blogger Dương Phạm said...

Biệt thự Gamuda
Biet thu Gamuda
Biet thu Gamuda Gardens
Biệt thự Gamuda Gardens
Biet thu Gamuda City
Biệt thự Gamuda City
Giá bán Biệt thự Gamuda
Biệt thự liền kề Gamuda
Biệt thự Gamuda Garden
Biệt thự mẫu Gamuda
Biet thu mau Gamuda Gardens

Don lap Gamuda
Đơn lập Gamuda
Biệt thự đơn lập Gamuda
Biet thu don lap Gamuda
Ban biet thu don lap Gamuda
đơn lập Gamua Gardens
don lap Gamuda Gardens
Mặt bằng biệt thự đơn lập Gamuda
Mat bang biet thu don lap Gamuda

Song lap Gamuda
Song lập Gamuda
Biệt thự song lập Gamuda
Biet thu song lap Gamuda
Ban biet thu song lap Gamuda
Song lập Gamua Gardens
Song lap Gamuda Gardens
Mặt bằng biệt thự song lập Gamuda
Mat bang biet thu song lap Gamuda

25 May 2016 at 23:35  
Blogger Dương Phạm said...

Gold Season Nguyễn Tuân
Chung cư Gold Season 47 Nguyễn Tuân
Chung cư Gold Season Nguyễn Tuân
Chung cư Nguyễn Tuân
Chung cư Gold season
Chung cư 47 Nguyễn Tuân
Gold Season 47 Nguyễn Tuân
Gold Season
Chung cư goldseason 47 nguyễn tuân
Goldseason Nguyễn Tuân
chung cư goldseason nguyễn tuân
Chung cư goldseason
Goldseason 47 Nguyễn Tuân
Chung cu Gold Season Nguyen Tuan
Chung cu Nguyen Tuan
Chung cu 47 Nguyen Tuan
Gold Season 47 Nguyen Tuan
Chung cu goldseason 47 Nguyen tuan
Goldseason Nguyen Tuan
Chung cu goldseason Nguyen tuan
Chung cu goldseason
Goldseason 47 Nguyen Tuan
Gold season hà nội
47 nguyễn tuân
Bán chung cư Nguyễn Tuân
Bán chung cư 47 Nguyễn Tuân
Dự án Goldseason

25 May 2016 at 23:36  
Blogger Dương Phạm said...

cong tu dong
cổng tự động
cong tu dong Barrier
cua tu dong Barrier
cua tu dong
cửa tự động
barrier tự động
barie tự động
barie tu dong
barrier tu dong
cổng barie
barie tu dong
máy dò kim loại
may do kim loai
may do kim loai cam tay
may do kim loai cam tay
máy dò kim loại bằng tay
may do kim loai cam tay
may do kim loai bang tay

25 May 2016 at 23:36  
Blogger Gege Dai said...

"herve leger dresses"
"coach outlet clearance"
"mulberry uk"
"air max 90"
"longchamp solde"
"swarovski crystal"
"true religion jeans"
"coach outlet"
"hermes belt for sale"
"marc jacobs"
"cheap mlb jerseys"
"chaussure louboutin"
"swarovski outlet"
"oakley sunglasses"
"coach outlet"
"coach handbags"
"timberland shoes"
"iphone case uk"
"coach outlet store"
"ferragamo outlet"
"louis vuitton handbags outlet"
"christian louboutin outlet"
"ralph lauren uk"
"louis vuitton handbags outlet"
"ed hardy clothing"
"ray-ban sunglasses"
"oakley sunglasses wholesale"
"ray ban sunglasses"
"rolex watches"
"fred perry polo shirts"
"ralph lauren pas cher"
"rolex watches"
"rolex watches for sale"
"cazal outlet"
"tiffany outlet"

13 July 2016 at 01:10  
Blogger Dương Phạm said...

Chung cư Tân Hoàng Minh Quảng An
Tân Hoàng Minh Quảng An
Dự án Tân Hoàng Minh Quảng An
D’.Le Roi Soleil
chung cư quảng an tây hồ
Chung cư D’.Le Roi Soleil

4 August 2016 at 01:08  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home