.
by ericdraitser
The complexities of the Arab Spring and the
struggle for political freedom throughout the Arab world should not obscure what
has now become an absolutely essential understanding for all anti-imperialists:
the Muslim Brotherhood is one of the most powerful weapons of the Western ruling
class in the Muslim world. While that may be a difficult pill for some to
swallow for emotional or psychological reasons, one need look no further than
the insidious role the organization is playing in Syria and the abuses of power
and human rights of the government of Egypt. In the US-NATO sponsored war
against the Assad government, the Muslim Brotherhood has emerged as the leading
western-sanctioned force, the avant-garde of the imperialist assault. While, in
Egypt, President Morsi and the Brotherhood government seek to destroy what had
been, little more than a year ago, the promise of the revolution.
Muslim Brotherhood in Syria
This week's establishment of the Supreme
Military Command, in charge of all military aid and coordination to the rebels,
demonstrates unequivocally the leadership role of the Muslim Brotherhood in the
drive for regime change in Syria.
As Reuters reported, "The unified command includes many with ties to the
Muslim Brotherhood and to Salafists...it excludes the most senior officers who
have defected from Assad's military."[1] This command structure, formed at the
behest and under the sponsorship of the US, UK, France, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and
Turkey among others, does not simply include members of the Muslim Brotherhood,
it is, in fact, dominated by them. Is it possible that the Western imperial
powers simply did not notice that the group they were forming was comprised of
these elements? To suggest so would be to accuse some of the leading
"statesmen" of the world (Hillary Clinton, William Hague, Laurent Fabius, Ahmet
Davutoglu, etc.) of being stupid. Alas, they are not so. Instead, these
individuals have collaborated to create a Muslim Brotherhood proxy force in
Syria, one that can be controlled and depended on to do the bidding of the West.
However, it is not enough to say that the Muslim
Brotherhood is heading this new military structure, for that would be to imply
that they have not been playing a critical role all along. Rather, the
organization has been central to the destabilization of Syria since the
beginning of the armed conflict. The Syrian National Council, originally the
face of the Western-backed "opposition" was itself dominated behind the scenes
by the Muslim Brotherhood.
As former Muslim Brotherhood leader Ali Sadreddine stated regarding the SNC,
"We chose this face, accepted by the West...We nominated [former SNC head Burhan]
Ghalioun as a front for national action. We are not moving now as the
Brotherhood but as part of a front that includes all currents."[2] Essentially
then, we see that the organization has, from the very beginning, maintained a
large degree of control of the foreign-based opposition, as distinctly different
from the indigenous opposition of the National Coordinating Councils and other
groups. The Muslim Brotherhood, an international political and paramilitary
machine, has come to lead the battle against Assad government.
In fact, the Muslim Brotherhood has provided
many forms of leadership and assistance to the foreign-based, foreign-backed
opposition beyond simply direct leadership. From providing diplomatic and
political cover, to on-the-ground tactical support such as weapons smuggling,
fighter recruitment, and other necessary responsibilities, the organization has
come to permeate every aspect of what we in the West conveniently refer to as
the "rebels".
As early as May 2012, the Muslim Brotherhood in
Egypt, the center of the organization, was already providing the political and
diplomatic support the rebels needed to topple the Assad regime. As they were
poised to win the Egyptian elections, the Brotherhood was busy making public
comments about the need for Western military intervention in Syria.
The organization's spokesman, Mahmoud Ghozlan stated, "The Muslim
Brotherhood calls on Arab, Islamic, and international governments to
intervene...to bring down the [Assad] regime."[3] This brazen public statement
flies in the face of all arguments which claim that the Muslim Brotherhood is
somehow anti-imperialist, that they stand in opposition to Western dominance of
the Arab world. On the contrary, though they may posture themselves as opposing
the West, they are, in fact, tools of the imperial powers used to destroy
independent nations which stand in opposition to US hegemony in the Middle East.
This political and diplomatic backing is merely
one aspect of the Brotherhood's involvement in the destruction of Syria. As the
New York Times reported in June of 2012, "CIA officers are operating
secretly in Southern Turkey helping allies decide which Syrian opposition
fighters across the border will receive arms...by way of a shadowy network of
intermediaries including Syria's Muslim Brotherhood."[4] The use of the Muslim
Brotherhood to smuggle arms to the rebels in Syria should come as no surprise
considering the fact that it is the Sunni monarchies of the region (Saudi Arabia
and Qatar primarily) who have been the most vociferous voices championing regime
change in Syria by any means necessary. The relationship between these
monarchies and the Muslim Brotherhood is self-evident: they share similar
religious convictions and are avowed enemies of all forms of Shiism. Moreover,
they have been part and parcel of the system of US hegemony that has kept the
entire region under its vice grip for decades.
Many have argued in the past that, though they
share identical ideologies and "brand", the Syrian branch of the Muslim
Brotherhood is somehow independent of the Muslim Brotherhood proper. This
preposterous claim is countered by the simple fact that every public position
the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood has taken has been in direct alignment with the
public statements from Cairo. As the
Carnegie Middle East
Center's article The Muslim Brotherhood in Syria demonstrates,
Since the beginning of the revolution, the Brotherhood has maintained that
foreign intervention is the only possible solution to the crisis in Syria. In
October 2011, it also called on Turkey to intervene and establish protected
humanitarian zones in Turkish territory."[5] When two entities bear the same
name, have the same sponsors, and take the same positions, it is an exercise in
willful ignorance to argue that they are somehow not the same entity or, as is
more accurate, taking orders from the same masters. But who are these masters?
The Powers Behind the Muslim Brotherhood
In examining the utterly insidious role that the
Muslim Brotherhood is playing in Syria, one must begin with an understanding of
the historical relationship between the Muslim Brotherhood and Western
imperialism. The organization was founded by
Hassan al-Banna in
1928 with the intention of reestablishing a purer form of Islam as had existed
centuries before. However, this was merely the religious veneer that was
created to mask the political intentions of the organization. As explained in
the
Mother Jones article entitled What is the Muslim Brotherhood and Will It
Take Over Egypt?, the author explains that, "The Muslim Brotherhood served
as a battering ram against nationalists and communists, despite the Brothers'
Islam-based anti-imperialism, the group often ended up making common cause with
the colonial British. It functioned as an intelligence agency, infiltrating
left-wing and nationalist groups."[6] This indisputable fact, that the Muslim
Brotherhood functioned, even its early days, as a de facto arm of Western
intelligence, is critical to understanding its development and current political
power.
However, there are those who argue that, despite
this "coincidence" of objectives and agendas, the Muslim Brotherhood could never
be tied directly to the intelligence community. However, as Robert Dreyfuss,
author of the Mother Jones article clearly points out, there is ample evidence
tying the leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood directly to the CIA:
By then [1954], the group's
chief international organizer and best-known official was Said
Ramadan, the son-in-law of Hassan al-Banna. Ramadan had come to the
attention of both the CIA and MI-6, the British intelligence service. In
researching my book ... I came across an unusual photograph that showed Ramadan
with President Eisenhower in the Oval Office. By then, or soon after, Ramadan
had likely been recruited as a CIA agent. Wall Street Journal reporter
Ian Johnson has since documented the close ties between Ramadan and various
Western intelligence services ... Johnson writes: ‘By the end of the decade, the
CIA was overtly backing Ramadan.'"[7]
The fact that the central figure in the
international organization was a known CIA agent corroborates the assertions
made by countless analysts and investigators that the Brotherhood was used as a
weapon against Nasser and, in fact, all Arab socialist leaders who at that time
were part of a rising tide of Arab nationalism which sought, as its ultimate
goal, independence from Western imperial domination.
In order to fully grasp just how the Brotherhood
developed into the organization we know today, one must understand the
relationship between it and the royal family of Saudi Arabia. In fact, the
Saudis have been the key financiers of the Brotherhood for decades for the same
reasons that the United States and the Western powers needed them: opposition to
Arab nationalism and the growing "insolence" of Shiite states. Dreyfuss writes,
"From its early days, the Brotherhood was financed generously by the Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia, which appreciated its ultra-conservative politics and its virulent
hatred of Arab communists."[8] Essentially, as the United States began to exert
its post-war might throughout the region, the Muslim Brotherhood was there to be
a willing beneficiary and humble servant sowing the seeds of hatred between
Sunni and Shia, espousing a hate-filled Salafist ideology that preached conflict
and inescapable war between the branches of Islam. Naturally, all to the
benefit of Western powers who cared little for the ideology and more about the
money and resources.
A Tool of the Western Powers Today?
It is often argued that, though the historical
record unequivocally shows the Brotherhood as intimately connected to Western
intelligence, somehow the organization has changed, that it has become a
peaceful force for political progress in the Arab world. As recent events in
Egypt have shown, nothing could be further from the truth. With the
undemocratic attempted power grab by Egyptian President Morsi, the scaling back
of civil liberties, the rights of women, and religious and ethnic minorities,
the Muslim Brotherhood has shown itself to be little more than a reactionary
political force parading itself as a form of "progress".
If one had any doubts as to the true intentions
and motivations of the Muslim Brotherhood once in power in Egypt, one needed
look no further than its position on the institutions of global finance capital,
particularly the International Monetary Fund. In one of the first decisions
taken by Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood government,
Cairo
established that it would, in fact, welcome conditional loans from the IMF[9] to
rescue itself from the prospect of a continued economic crisis. However, as
part of the conditions of the loan, Morsi's government would have to drastically
reduce subsidies, regulations, and other "market restrictions" while increasing
taxes on the middle class. Essentially, this meant that the Brotherhood
consented to the usual cocktail of austerity medicine that had been administered
by the agents of finance capital so many times all over the world. This,
naturally, begged the question: Was this the end of the revolution? Indeed, many
in the streets of Cairo are asking themselves this same question. Or, to put it
more accurately, they already know the answer.
In Egypt, as in Syria, the Muslim Brotherhood
has made itself into an appendage of the Western imperialist ruling class. It
has dutifully served these interests over the course of decades, though the
names, faces, and propaganda have changed over the years. As we watch the
tragic images coming from Syria or the tens of thousands in the streets of
Cairo, we must question why it has taken so long for this perfidious
organization to be exposed or even understood. The answer is, as usual, because
it serves the interests of global capital to keep the rest of the world confused
as to who the enemies of progress really are. By revealing their true nature,
the real forces of peace and progress around the world can reject the Muslim
Brotherhood and the imperial system in all its overt and covert forms.
Eric Draitser is the founder of StopImperialism.com. He is an
independent geopolitical analyst based in New York City. He is a regular
contributor to Russia Today, Press TV, GlobalResearch.ca, and other media
outlets. You can reach him at ericdraitser@gmail.com.
[1] http://news.yahoo.com/rebels-circle-damascus-airport-russia-u-downbeat-013515100.html
[2] http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/06/us-syria-brotherhood-idUSBRE84504R20120506
[3] http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/egypts-brotherhood-calls-intervention-syria
[4] http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/21/world/middleeast/cia-said-to-aid-in-steering-arms-to-syrian-rebels.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
[5] http://carnegie-mec.org/publications/?fa=48370
[6] http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/02/what-is-the-muslim-brotherhood
[7] Ibid.
[8] Ibid.
[9] http://www.albawaba.com/business/morsi-egypt-imf-loan-432065
http://ericdraitser.podbean.com/articles/unmasking-the-brotherhood-syria-egypt-and-beyond/
http://ericdraitser.podbean.com/articles/unmasking-the-brotherhood-syria-egypt-and-beyond/