Oslo Bombing just another False Flag Attack

.

5 Reasons Why The Oslo Bombing Already Looks Like A False Flag Attack



NORWAY: SOCIALIST LEFT PARTY TO VOTE ON MOTION CALLING FOR BOMBING ISRAEL IF IT ACTS AGAINST HAMAS IN GAZA: http://europenews.dk/en/node/41655

Norway pulling out of NATO bombing of Libya: http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=13809790

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7q3bWEvl7o

Witnesses Suggest Second Shooter Involved in Norway Youth Camp Rampage: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/07/23/witnesses-suggest-second-shooter-invo...

Oslo bombing was false flag . Three targets one lone nut?

NORWAY: SOCIALIST LEFT PARTY TO VOTE ON MOTION CALLING FOR BOMBING ISRAEL IF IT ACTS AGAINST HAMAS IN GAZA

It’s come to this. The junior partner in the Norwegian government, the Socialist Left Party of Kristin Halvorsen, (Sosialistisk Venstreparti), plans to vote on a measure calling for military action against Israel if it decides to act against the Hamas in Gaza. Norway, Israel and the Jews blog informs the Tundra Tabloids of the following:
Read more.

Document.no has published all the comments that Anders Behring Breivik posted on this news service.
These can be read in its entirety HERE .

Document.no run by Hans Rustad, a former journalist left. Hans Rustad is Jewish, extremely pro-Zionist and warns of Islamization, violence and other problems associated with Muslim immigration. On his blog meet people with similar opinions, then one of them Behring Anders Breivik.

Anders Behring Breivik comments are long and thoughtful and shows, among other things, Christian fundamentalism and sympathy with the violent Jewish movement EDL, English Defence League, which nationell.nu previously reported. He shows an extreme Zionism and Israel-love.

How did it look at Utöya days before the terrorist attack? See image below:

From Nationell.nu: According to Norwegian and Swedish media, he is also an active Zionist and anti-Muslim blogger.

Anders Behring Breivik allegedly pushed the extreme Zionist blog Fjordman, who goes to visit HERE .

It also writes the national newspaper Realisten.se, as Anders Behring Breivik at a fillfälle should have been in contact with .

On the blog claimed inter alia that “Europe died in Auschwitz.”

Fjordman is read by the Sweden Democrat Kent Ekeroth:

http://kentekeroth.se/2009/05/30/den-muslimska-koloniseringen/

His anti-Muslim views is confirmed by another source, VG.no writes :

“Breivik has blant annet hat mange innlegg on nettstedet Document.no that you et Islam critical nettsted who publishes news og comments.”

On the blog he wrote comments in their real names.

On his Facebook page indicates he was Winston Churchill as one of their models. Behring Breivik also writes that he is engaged in “bodybuilding” and that one of his favorite books is “process” of the Jew Franz Kafka.

He also likes Max Manus, therefore, a German anti-partisan in Norway who fought the German Nazis during World War II.

One of his interests are “Freemasonry” , freemasonry.

According tv2.no he is a member of St. John the barn “Søilene” .

View complete his profile HERE .

Victor Stone Quist at Aftonbladet writes:

“32-year-old, according to VG has been active in the Islam-critical online forums and comment on news articles in which he expressed displeasure over the media is not sufficiently critical Islam.”

On July 17, the day of his entire Facebook profile created, released, Anders Behring Breivik a message on Twitter where he writes that “One person with a belief is Equal To The force of 100,000 WHO Have only not raised.”

Was this a Mossad Operation?

What was the connection of the island killing to the Oslo bombings?

What was the connection to the anti-terror drill being conducted on the same day?

Oslo Bombing: Reports men in black unmarked uniforms sweeping area prior to attack




Terrorist Bomb Attack in Oslo, Norway ... Who Dunnit?
As everyone knows by now, there has been a horrific bomb attack in the center of Oslo, Norway and a shooting spree in a Norwegian summer camp:


As everyone knows by now, there has been a horrific bomb attack in the center of Oslo, Norway and a shooting spree in a Norwegian summer camp:
Our thoughts and prayers are with the victims.

Norway is an odd choice as a Muslim terror target:

• Norway has endorsed Palestinian statehood. See this, this and this

• Norway has excluded Isareli investments. As Haaertz reported last year:

Norway’s 450 billion euro oil-riches fund has excluded two Israeli firms involved in developing settlements ... on ethical grounds, Norway’s finance ministry said on Monday.

• Indeed, Senator Lieberman has accused Norway of promoting anti-semitism
  

• Norway has also announced its plan to withdraw from the Libyan war

• The summer camp where the shootings took place had just concluded a pro-Palestinian rally the day before

This is hardly the profile of a normal Muslim terrorist target. Therefore, many are alleging that it is another false flag terror attack.

In addition, as Business Insider notes:

The other big possibility, touted by some on Twitter, is that the attack could have come from the Norwegian right. The Norwegian far right were once a feared proposition but have been relatively mellow in recent years due to the success of populist success of the Progress Party.

BBC notes:

Meanwhile a gunman dressed as a policeman started shooting at a Labour youth camp on the island of Utoeya.

Unconfirmed reports say several people have been killed. The gunman has been arrested.

The Telegraph reports:

Hours later there was an summer camp youth conference of the ruling Labour Party, which is being attended by current Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg. The conference is taking place on the island of Utøya. The man apparently infiltrated the conference on the pretence that he had been sent by the police as a security measure in the wake of the Oslo explosions. As such, it is likely he was ethnically Norwegian. This could indicate the involvement of a far-right group rather than an Islamist group ...

MSNBC notes:

Police say the gunman is a 32-year-old Norwegian.

Witnesses described the suspect as "blond" and "Nordic-looking." Late Friday, Knut Storberegt, Norway's royal minister of justice and the police, confirmed that he is a Norwegian; the BBC, citing police, said he was from Utoya. Police said he is also believed to have been involved in the bombing that killed seven people earlier in the day in Oslo, about 25 miles away.

Magnus Ranstorp, a specialist in militant Islamic movements and research director at the Center for Asymmetric Threat Studies at the Swedish National Defense College, cautioned that widespread assumptions that the attacks were connected to international terrorism could be wrong.

The description of the suspect and his possible involvement in bombing national government offices "point to an internal rather than external extremist," Ranstorp told Nettavisen.

But see this and this.

****

Related:

H/T to kenny's sideshow for these links:

NORWAY + ISRAEL = Unfavourable Relations

Norway targeted by mossad for not doing exactly what they are told by bombastic yiddish-khazar masters who use freemason as patsy!

Unraveling Anders Behring Breivik

Zionists admit Breivik is Fjordman! Breivik, Rightist Mass Murderer, ‘Atlas Shrugged’ Contributor

Anders Behring Breivik: “Christian Fundamentalist”

Non-”Al-Qaeda” Ultra-Rightwing Fundamentalist White Boy Hitting Norwegian Liberals

91 people killed–The first thing he did was shoot the cutest girl he saw–Eyewitness to VG

Mossad Mauls Norway

Norway Bombing Has Stench Of Mossad All Over It!

Norwegian attack, three targets one lone nut? I doubt it.

UPDATE: Were Murdoch's MOSSAD Buddies Behind the Norway Blasts?

Wayne Madsen on the Oslo Attacks: Israel's Mossad Did It

"You will not bomb us into silence" - Norway

Israeli ‘Venegeance’ strikes Oslo

When terrorists aren’t Jihadists From Atlantic Yesterday’s first reports on the massacre in Norway suggested that there was a link between the horrific attacks, which left 92 dead at latest reports, and Muslim extremists. Only later was the news released that the suspect taken by police, Anders Behring Breivik, was apparently a conservative, right-wing Christian with strong anti-Muslim and anti-immigration beliefs. Many in the media were left reeling over the fact that others were so quick to report and comment that Muslims were involved, before there was clear evidence. Rupert Murdoch’s newspaper The Sun had as a headline on the front page, “Al Qaeda Massacre: Norway’s 9/11.” The Wall Street Journal posted an editorial on the bombings that begins with references to Islam. It starts: When cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad appeared in a Danish newspaper in the fall of 2005 and sparked a full-blown jihadist campaign against Denmark, then-Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen responded with a telling remark. “We Danes feel like we have been placed in a scene in the wrong movie,” he told the German newsweekly Der Spiegel.” Joe Weisenthal, deputy editor of Business Insider, tweeted: “It is pretty bewildering that the first 3 paragraphs of this WSJ editorial on Norway are about Al-Qaeda/Islam.” The most controversial piece, however, seems to be an editorial at The Washington Post by “Right Turn” columnist Jennifer Rubin, who quoted the Weekly Standard that: We don’t know if al Qaeda was directly responsible for today’s events, but in all likelihood the attack was launched by part of the jihadist hydra. Prominent jihadists have already claimed online that the attack is payback for Norway’s involvement in the war in Afghanistan. The editorial remains up on the Post, “sixteen hours after its claims were shown to be false and hysterical, it’s still there, with no correction or apology,” according to James Fallows at The Atlantic. Fallows responded to Rubin’s piece, in a blog post titled, “The Washington Post Owes the World an Apology for this Item,” writing that: No, this is a sobering reminder for those who think it’s too tedious to reserve judgment about horrifying events rather than instantly turning them into talking points for pre-conceived views. On a per capita basis, Norway lost twice as many people today as the U.S. did on 9/11. Glenn Greenwald writes: Al Qaeda is always to blame, even when it isn’t, even when it’s allegedly the work of a Nordic, Muslim-hating, right-wing European nationalist… we’ve seen repeatedly: that Terrorism has no objective meaning and, at least in American political discourse, has come functionally to mean: violence committed by Muslims whom the West dislikes, no matter the cause or the target. Indeed, in many (though not all) media circles, discussion of the Oslo attack quickly morphed from this is Terrorism (when it was believed Muslims did it) to no, this isn’t Terrorism, just extremism (once it became likely that Muslims didn’t). Ibrahim Hewitt writes an editoral at Al-Jazeera, where he observes that once media outlets noted that the suspect was not Muslim, they disassociated connections between the suspect’s beliefs and his alleged violent actions. …the perpetrator was a “blond, blue-eyed Norwegian” with “political traits towards the right, and anti-Muslim views.” Not surprisingly, the man’s intentions were neither linked to these “traits,” nor to his postings on “websites with Christian fundamentalist tendencies.” Any influence “remains to be seen”; echoes of Oklahoma 1995. Interestingly, this criminal is described by one unnamed Norwegian official as a “madman.” …Anyone who claims therefore, that the perpetrator’s “right-wing traits” and “anti-Muslim views,” or even links with “Christian fundamentalist” websites are irrelevant is trying to draw a veil over the unacceptable truths of such “traits” and expecting us to believe that right-wing ideology is incapable of prompting someone towards such criminality. The right-wing, anti-government mindset attributed to the Norwegian rampage suspect has observers recalling US extremist Timothy McVeigh – behind the devastating Oklahoma City bombing which killed 168 people, including 19 children, and injured more than 800. McVeigh, then just 26, blew up a van he had packed with explosives and parked outside a large federal building in the Oklahoman state capital, on April 19, 1995. The blast was the deadliest ever domestic attack in US history, and brought into sharp focus the threat of homegrown terrorism. Arrested shortly afterwards, McVeigh, a Gulf War veteran, was found to have been a figure in neo-Nazi groups and even claimed to have acted for the “common good” of Americans, as he railed against what he thought was the dictatorship of the federal government. (sound like tea party rhetoric?)

Sources: Youtube, totalcollapse, Georgewashingtom2, Atlantic